Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Riek

Director of Public Prosecutions v Riek

Case [2020] VCC 1893

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Riek [2020] VCC 1893
Case: [2020] VCC 1893
Decision Date: 30 November 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Riek [2020] VCC 1893

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Douglass v R [2020] NSWCCA 284
Citation 1 (Para 4)

…identify the principles of law applied by the judge and the main factual findings on which the judge relied.[5] [5] CPA s 420F. See also Douglass v R (2012) 290 ALR 699, 702; AK v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438 at [107] per Heydon J.…
Wells v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASCA 27
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…t can be drawn from the proven facts.[17] [17] The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] (2016) 258 CLR 308 [46] – [47]; Wells v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASCA 27 [14]; Kenworthy v The Queen [No 2] [2016] WASCA 207 [18]; Higton v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 43 [17].…
Kenworthy v The Queen [No 2] [2016] WASCA 207
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] (2016) 258 CLR 308 [46] – [47]; Wells v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASCA 27 [14]; Kenworthy v The Queen [No 2] [2016] WASCA 207 [18]; Higton v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 43 [17].…
Higton v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 43
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASCA 27 [14]; Kenworthy v The Queen [No 2] [2016] WASCA 207 [18]; Higton v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 43 [17].…
The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] QCA 1
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…must be satisfied that the inference is the only reasonable inference that can be drawn from the proven facts.[17] [17] The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] (2016) 258 CLR 308 [46] – [47]; Wells v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASCA 27 [14]; Kenworthy v The Queen [No 2] [2016] WASCA 207 [18]; Higton v The State of W…
Roe v The State of Western Australia [2015] WASCA 64
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…of Western Australia [2013] WASCA 1 [23]; Higton v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 43 [16] - [18]; Roe v The State of Western Australia [2015] WASCA 64.…
Thompson v The State of Western Australia [2013] WASCA 1
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…is not, the Crown will have failed to prove Mr Riek’s guilt of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. [24] Thompson v The State of Western Australia [2013] WASCA 1 [23]; Higton v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 43 [16] - [18]; Roe v The State of Western Australia [2015] WASCA 64.…
R v AB [2011] ACTSC 204
Citation 8 (Para 2)

…n is yes, I will find the accused guilty of that offence; if the answer is no, I will find the accused not guilty of that offence. [8] [8] R v AB [2011] ACTSC 204 (16 December 2011) (Penfold J) 65.…
Mannella v R [2010] VSCA 357
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…umstances which is consistent with the innocence of the accused, I must find him or her not guilty.[12] [12] R v Hodge (1838) 2 Lew 277; Mannella v R [2010] VSCA 357; Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Barca v R (1975) 133 CLR 82; Plom…
AK v Western Australia [2008] HCA 8
Citation 10 (Para 4)

…dge and the main factual findings on which the judge relied.[5] [5] CPA s 420F. See also Douglass v R (2012) 290 ALR 699, 702; AK v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438 at [107] per Heydon J.…
R v Allen [2007] VSCA 97
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…ut together’: per Lord Cairns, in Belhaven and Stenton Peerage , cited in R v Van Beelen .[21] [21] See R v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; R v Allen [2007] VSCA 97; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Van Beelen ; Thomas v R [1972] NZLR 34; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573).…
R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13
Citation 12 (Para 1)

…he united force of all the circumstances put together’: per Lord Cairns, in Belhaven and Stenton Peerage , cited in R v Van Beelen .[21] [21] See R v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; R v Allen [2007] VSCA 97; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Van Beelen ; Thomas v R [1972] NZLR 34; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170…
R v Micallef [2002] NSWCCA 480
Citation 13 (Para 1)

…ous reasoning in order to explain away each and every individual circumstance as being consistent with innocence.[16] [15] Peacock. [16] R v Micallef [2002] NSWCCA 480.…
Knight v The Queen [1992] HCA 56
Citation 14 (Para 1)

…t with the innocence of the accused, I must find him or her not guilty.[12] [12] R v Hodge (1838) 2 Lew 277; Mannella v R [2010] VSCA 357; Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Barca v R (1975) 133 CLR 82; Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234; Thoma…
Shepherd v The Queen [1990] HCA 56
Citation 15 (Para 1)

…st find him or her not guilty.[12] [12] R v Hodge (1838) 2 Lew 277; Mannella v R [2010] VSCA 357; Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Barca v R (1975) 133 CLR 82; Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234; Thomas v R (1960) 102 CLR 584.…
Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) [1984] HCA 7
Citation 16 (Para 1)

…Hodge (1838) 2 Lew 277; Mannella v R [2010] VSCA 357; Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Barca v R (1975) 133 CLR 82; Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234; Thomas v R (1960) 102 CLR 584.…
Barca v the Queen [1975] HCA 42
Citation 17 (Para 1)

…lla v R [2010] VSCA 357; Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Barca v R (1975) 133 CLR 82; Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234; Thomas v R (1960) 102 CLR 584.…
Plomp v The Queen [1963] HCA 44
Citation 18 (Para 2)

…nce that the circumstances would enable [me] to draw.’[10] [9] Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619 (‘ Peacock ’). [10] Plomp v The Queen (1963) 110 CLR 234 (‘ Plomp ’).…
Thomas v The Queen [1960] HCA 2
Citation 19 (Para 1)

…herd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Barca v R (1975) 133 CLR 82; Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234; Thomas v R (1960) 102 CLR 584.…
Martin v Osborne [1936] HCA 23
Citation 20 (Para 2)

…be accompanied by the occurrence of the fact to be proved is so high that the contrary cannot reasonably be supposed.’[11] [11] Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367.…
Peacock v The King [1911] HCA 66
Citation 21 (Para 2)

…l inference, but that it should be ‘the only rational inference that the circumstances would enable [me] to draw.’[10] [9] Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619 (‘ Peacock ’). [10] Plomp v The Queen (1963) 110 CLR 234 (‘ Plomp ’).…

AI Chat coming soon