Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Poole (a pseudonym)

Director of Public Prosecutions v Poole (a pseudonym)

Case [2020] VCC 340

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Poole (a pseudonym) [2020] VCC 340
Case: [2020] VCC 340
Decision Date: 26 March 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Poole (a pseudonym) [2020] VCC 340

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Charles [2021] VCC 1636

Cases Citing This Decision

Re KF [2022] VSC 349
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…y in 2011/2012 and later around 2016/2017. She was also offence free for 12 months up until the current offending. [31]See for example, DPP v Poole [2020] VCC 340 where rehabilitative steps pursued whilst on bail were viewed favourably by the sentencing judge.…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Farley (a pseudonym) [2025] VCC 1681
Citation 2

…ferences all over the shop. Some in your favour, some not. [12] Watkins (a pseudonym) v The King [2023] VSCA 203. [13] DPP v Zane Poole (a pseudonym) [2020] VCC 340. 114My experience is that one can never find an identical case, and even if one could be found, there is no such thing as one correct sentence. There…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Tirris [2022] VCC 1575
Citation 3 (Para 83)

…lture and the historical disadvantage and inter-generational trauma already referred to. 147In a 2020 sentence of mine, DPP v Poole (a pseudonym) [2020] VCC 340 at [83]-[104] I analysed the relationship between immediate circumstances and the wider inter-generational context in greater detail than I propose to do…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Meadows (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 816
Citation 4

…bdi [2020] VCC 1668; DPP v Singh [2019] VCC 1484; DPP v Singh [2020] VCC 1102; DPP v Barbar [2021] VCC 180; DPP v McInnes [2020] VCC 729; DPP v Poole [2020] VCC 340; DPP v Iudice [2020] VCC 316; DPP v Amin [2019] VCC 1756; DPP v Powers [2020] VCC 1727; DPP v Hyde [2019] VCC 712; DPP v Thompson [2020] VCC 1178; Wo…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Charles [2021] VCC 1636
Citation 5

…d Robbery – Intentionally Damage Property – Attempted Theft. Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; DPP v Zane Poole (a pseudonym) [2020] VCC 340; R v McKee [2003] VSCA 16; DPP v Brooks [2008] VSCA 253; DPP v Heyfron [2019] VSCA 130; Douglas and Albone v R (1995) 56 FCR 465; R v Mills [1998] 4 VR 235; Azzo…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

DPP v Heyfron [2019] VSCA 130
Citation 1 (Para 56)

…had a number of features referred to by Wood J. 78Similar concepts have been referred to elsewhere, including in the recent decision of DPP v Heyfron [2019] VSCA 130 per Kaye J, at [56] to [59]. 79In Douglas v R; Albone v R (1995) 56 FCR 465, which is an Australian Capital Territory (ACT) decision. The ACT Court o…
Honeysett v The Queen [2018] VSCA 214
Citation 2

…Crown Lands Alienation Act of 1861 (NSW). Cases Cited: Akoka v The Queen [2017] VSCA 214; R v Gladue [1999] 1 SCR 688; Honeysett v R [2018] VSCA 214; Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37; R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58; Neal v R (1983) 139 CLR 305; DPP v Fuller-Cust (2002) 6 VR 496 ; DPP v Terrick (2009) 197 A Crim R 474;…
Douglas v The Queen [2018] NZCA 26
Citation 3

…R 58; Neal v R (1983) 139 CLR 305; DPP v Fuller-Cust (2002) 6 VR 496 ; DPP v Terrick (2009) 197 A Crim R 474; Douglas v R, Albone v R (1995) 56 FCR 465; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38. Sentence: Five years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years. ---…
Akoka v The Queen [2017] VSCA 214
Citation 4

…ed to wider cultural context and history. Legislation Cited: Crown Lands Alienation Act of 1861 (NSW). Cases Cited: Akoka v The Queen [2017] VSCA 214; R v Gladue [1999] 1 SCR 688; Honeysett v R [2018] VSCA 214; Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37; R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58; Neal v R (1983) 139 CLR 305; DPP v Fuller-C…
Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38
Citation 5

…er-Cust (2002) 6 VR 496 ; DPP v Terrick (2009) 197 A Crim R 474; Douglas v R, Albone v R (1995) 56 FCR 465; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38. Sentence: Five years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years. ---…
Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
Citation 6

…of 1861 (NSW). Cases Cited: Akoka v The Queen [2017] VSCA 214; R v Gladue [1999] 1 SCR 688; Honeysett v R [2018] VSCA 214; Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37; R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58; Neal v R (1983) 139 CLR 305; DPP v Fuller-Cust (2002) 6 VR 496 ; DPP v Terrick (2009) 197 A Crim R 474; Douglas v R, Albone v R…
Neal v The Queen [1982] HCA 55
Citation 7

…reason of the offender's membership of an ethnic or other group. So much is essential to the even administration of criminal justice'. [14] R v Neal (1982) 149 CLR 305…
Fuller-Cust v The Queen [2003] HCATrans 394
Citation 8

…sett v R [2018] VSCA 214; Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37; R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58; Neal v R (1983) 139 CLR 305; DPP v Fuller-Cust (2002) 6 VR 496 ; DPP v Terrick (2009) 197 A Crim R 474; Douglas v R, Albone v R (1995) 56 FCR 465; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38. Sentence: Five years imprisonment with a…

AI Chat coming soon