Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
McCray (a pseudonym) v The Queen
[2017] VSCA 340
Citation 1
…[15] [2017] VSCA 340 [29]-[30]…
-
Matheas v The Queen
[2017] VSCA 330
Citation 2
…[10] [2017] VSCA 330 [46]-[50]…
-
Harmon (a pseudonym) v The Queen
[2017] VSCA 169
Citation 3
…[16] [2017] VSCA 169…
-
DPP v Hopson
[2016] VSCA 303
Citation 4
…[9] [2016] VSCA 303 [46]-[51]…
-
DPP v Granata
[2016] VSCA 190
Citation 5
…[8] [2016] VSCA 190 [124]-[128]…
-
Poursanidis v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 164
Citation 6
…[14] [2016] VSCA 164 [11]-[12]…
-
DPP v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym)
[2016] VSCA 148
Citation 7
…[7] [2016] VSCA 148…
-
Gordon v The Queen
[2013] VSCA 343
Citation 8
…[11] [2013] VSCA 343…
-
TRG v The Queen
[2011] VSCA 337
Citation 9
…RG v The Queen[22] , in which Weinberg JA referred to RLP and the passage from that judgment of Neave and Redlich JJA and also Hollingworth AJA: [22] [2011] VSCA 337…
-
R v RLP
[2009] VSCA 271
Citation 10
…[21] [2009] VSCA 271…
-
R v SBL
[2009] QCA 130
Citation 11
…[12] [2009] QCA 130…
-
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 12
…[3] (2007) 16 VR 269…
-
DPP v Toomey
[2006] VSCA 60
Citation 13
…JA referred to social rehabilitation, citing DPP v DJK[5] (allowing of course for the differences in factual circumstances to the present case): [4] [2006] VSCA 60 [5] [2003] VSCA 109…
-
DPP v DAK
[2004] VSCA 175
Citation 14
…[19] (2004) 10 VR 234…
-
DPP v DJK
[2003] VSCA 109
Citation 15
…ial rehabilitation, citing DPP v DJK[5] (allowing of course for the differences in factual circumstances to the present case): [4] [2006] VSCA 60 [5] [2003] VSCA 109…
-
DPP v G
[2002] VSCA 6
Citation 16
…[20] [2002] VSCA 6…