Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
1
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Perry
[2025] VSCA 217
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…ghtened the gravity of the instant offending. Ms Mason’s fear was greater because like offending had happened before.[11] [7] DPP v Perry [2025] VCC 190 (‘Reasons’). [8]Reasons, [1]–[13]. [9]Reasons, [15] [10]Reasons, [16]. [11]Reasons, [17]–[18].…
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Byast v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 344
Citation 1
…ffender arrested – complainant suffered profound and on-going impact – children affected Cases Cited: Byast v R [2021] VSCA 344 Bennett v R [2021] VSCA 253 R v Sebali [2006] VSCA 106 Sentence: 3 years 8 months non-parole period 18 months ---…
-
Matamata v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 253
Citation 2
…nt suffered profound and on-going impact – children affected Cases Cited: Byast v R [2021] VSCA 344 Bennett v R [2021] VSCA 253 R v Sebali [2006] VSCA 106 Sentence: 3 years 8 months non-parole period 18 months ---…
-
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 3
…rate distinction applied to these three contributing factors, leaving the question whether moderation can be applied to your criminal culpability. [6][2007] VSCA 102 29During submissions I was referred to three decisions dealing with this dilemma. 30In Byast v The Queen [7] the offender suffered from bipolar effec…
-
R v Sebalj
[2006] VSCA 106
Citation 4
…-going impact – children affected Cases Cited: Byast v R [2021] VSCA 344 Bennett v R [2021] VSCA 253 R v Sebali [2006] VSCA 106 Sentence: 3 years 8 months non-parole period 18 months ---…