Director of Public Prosecutions v Young (No 3)
[2025] VSC 423
Citation 1
(Para 14)
…by the time at which the suppression order application was decided. See also Director of Public Prosecutions v Pell (Suppression Order) [2018] VCC 905, [46]-[48], where Chief Judge Kidd considered that a number of contextual factors, including a “febrile media atmosphere”, exacerbated the potential for prejudice…
The Queen v The Herald & Weekly Times Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 253
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…ion order to apply beyond Victoria to Australia as a whole and ordered accordingly. There was no appeal. [6] DPP (Vic) v Pell (Suppression Order) [2018] VCC 905 (‘ Suppression Order Ruling ’).…
The Queen v The Herald & Weekly Times Pty Ltd (Ruling No 2)
[2020] VSC 800
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…and ordered accordingly, publishing his reasons (‘ Suppression Order Ruling ’).[2] There was no appeal. [2] DPP (Vic) v Pell (Suppression Order) [2018] VCC 905 (‘ Suppression Order Ruling ’).…
The Queen v The Herald & Weekly Times Pty Ltd (Ruling No 1)
[2020] VSC 616
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…in the relevant sense. These circumstances are not material to the discretion whether to make a discovery order. [30] DPP v Pell (Suppression Order) [2018] VCC 905.…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Pell (Review of Suppression Order)
[2018] VCC 2125
Citation 5
…Cases Cited: DPP v Pell (Suppression Order) [2018] VCC 905; Chaarani & Anor [2018] VSCA 299; Nationwide News v The Queen [2018] VSC 572; Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237; News Digital Media Pty Ltd v Mokbel (2010) 30 VR 248. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Brady & Ors (2015) 252 A Crim R 50.…