Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Parish

Director of Public Prosecutions v Parish

Case [2023] VCC 758

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Parish [2023] VCC 758
Case: [2023] VCC 758
Decision Date: 15 May 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Parish [2023] VCC 758

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Babar v The Queen [2022] VSCA 122
Citation 1

…or a single instance of digital rape after jury verdict upheld but described as ‘undoubtedly stern’); Babar v The Queen [2022] VSCA 122 (5 years after a plea of guilty upheld but described as ‘lenient’); Cao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 98 (8 years after a plea of guilty upheld); see also Wright v The Queen [2021] VSCA…
Salvaggio v The Queen [2022] VSCA 88
Citation 2

…some of these cases, sentence was imposed after a jury verdict. [32] Sentencing Act s 5B(2)(b). [33] Salvaggio v The Queen [2022] VSCA 88 (8 years for a single instance of digital rape after jury verdict upheld but described as ‘undoubtedly stern’); Babar v The Queen [2022] VSCA 122 (5 years after a plea of guil…
Clarke (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2022] VSCA 89
Citation 3 (Para 80)

…[10] Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]. [11] Clarke v The Queen [2022] VSCA 89 at [31]. 61I have explained above why the assaults you committed were serious examples of this offence. They involved violent degrading behaviour calculated to humiliate the victim. They are deserving of condemnation in strong te…
Seascape Constructions Pty Ltd v The Queen [2022] VSCA 29
Citation 4

…Cases Cited: Clarke (a pseudonym) v DPP [2022] VSCA 29; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mokhtari [2020] VSCA 161; Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…
Wright v The Queen [2021] VSCA 243
Citation 5

…as ‘lenient’); Cao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 98 (8 years after a plea of guilty upheld); see also Wright v The Queen [2021] VSCA 243 and Samuels (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2019] VSCA 14.…
Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169
Citation 6

…t to which you are entitled is reduced because you had a contested committal hearing at which Ms Marcus was cross examined. [24] Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169.…
Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173
Citation 7

…Prosecutions v Mokhtari [2020] VSCA 161; Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…
DPP v Mokhtari [2020] VSCA 161
Citation 8

…Cases Cited: Clarke (a pseudonym) v DPP [2022] VSCA 29; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mokhtari [2020] VSCA 161; Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…
Brown v the Queen [2019] VSCA 286
Citation 9 (Para 80)

…eudonym) v DPP [2022] VSCA 29; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mokhtari [2020] VSCA 161; Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…
Samuels v The Queen [2019] VSCA 14
Citation 10

…s after a plea of guilty upheld); see also Wright v The Queen [2021] VSCA 243 and Samuels (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2019] VSCA 14.…
Cao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 98
Citation 11

…bar v The Queen [2022] VSCA 122 (5 years after a plea of guilty upheld but described as ‘lenient’); Cao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 98 (8 years after a plea of guilty upheld); see also Wright v The Queen [2021] VSCA 243 and Samuels (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2019] VSCA 14.…
Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364
Citation 12

…CA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…
Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57
Citation 13 (Para 80)

…Cases Cited: Clarke (a pseudonym) v DPP [2022] VSCA 29; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mokhtari [2020] VSCA 161; Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…
R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102
Citation 14

…account by a sentencing court in certain circumstances. The prosecution submissions concede the point.[23] [21] R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269 [22] Defence Submissions for Plea Hearing dated 29 March 2023, [36]. [23] Prosecution Submissions on Sentence dated 4 April 2023, [5]. 89I accept that in light of your lengthy…
Esso Australia Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority [2000] VSCA 74
Citation 15

…161; Jurj v The Queen [2016] VSCA 57 at [80]; Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286; Flynn (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 173; R v O'Rourke [1997] 1 VR 246; Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364…

AI Chat coming soon