Director of Public Prosecutions v Nurzynski
Case
•
[2024] ACTSC 176
•5 June 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nurzynski [2024] ACTSC 176
[2024] ACTSC 176
5 June 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Director of Public Prosecutions v Nurzynski involved the defendant, Nurzynski, who was charged with manufacturing and discharging a firearm, as well as breaching a good behaviour order. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. Nurzynski entered an early guilty plea and provided assistance to the police, which were considered mitigating factors. However, Nurzynski had a history of drug and alcohol issues, which were deemed relevant to his sentencing.
The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate sentence for the manufacturing and discharging of a firearm, taking into account the mitigating factors of the early guilty plea and assistance to the police, as well as Nurzynski's long-standing drug and alcohol problems. The court also needed to decide whether a drug and alcohol treatment order was suitable for Nurzynski.
The court acknowledged the mitigating factors but emphasised the seriousness of the offences committed. The court recognised Nurzynski's drug and alcohol issues as a significant factor in his offending behaviour. The court decided that a term of imprisonment was necessary but, considering Nurzynski's willingness to engage in treatment, suspended the sentence upon the condition that he complied with a drug and alcohol treatment order. The court imposed a term of imprisonment of 13 months for the manufacturing offence and 18 months for the discharging offence, with a suspended sentence of 2 months. A drug and alcohol treatment order was also made.
In conclusion, the court ordered a term of imprisonment of 13 months and 18 months imposed, suspended upon a drug and alcohol treatment order being made. Additionally, a suspended sentence of 2 months was imposed.
The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate sentence for the manufacturing and discharging of a firearm, taking into account the mitigating factors of the early guilty plea and assistance to the police, as well as Nurzynski's long-standing drug and alcohol problems. The court also needed to decide whether a drug and alcohol treatment order was suitable for Nurzynski.
The court acknowledged the mitigating factors but emphasised the seriousness of the offences committed. The court recognised Nurzynski's drug and alcohol issues as a significant factor in his offending behaviour. The court decided that a term of imprisonment was necessary but, considering Nurzynski's willingness to engage in treatment, suspended the sentence upon the condition that he complied with a drug and alcohol treatment order. The court imposed a term of imprisonment of 13 months for the manufacturing offence and 18 months for the discharging offence, with a suspended sentence of 2 months. A drug and alcohol treatment order was also made.
In conclusion, the court ordered a term of imprisonment of 13 months and 18 months imposed, suspended upon a drug and alcohol treatment order being made. Additionally, a suspended sentence of 2 months was imposed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Sentencing
-
Breach of Good Behaviour Order
-
Early Guilty Plea
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nurzynski (No 2) [2025] ACTSC 254
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Director of Public Prosecutions v Rose
[2025] ACTSC 469
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nurzynski (No 2)
[2025] ACTSC 254
Director of Public Prosecutions v Kay
[2024] ACTSC 284
Cases Cited
33
Statutory Material Cited
4
Emitja v The Queen
[2016] NTCCA 4
Cranfield v The Queen
[2018] ACTCA 3
Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Cooke
[2007] NSWCA 2