Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Wilson v The King
[2023] VSCA 276
Citation 1
…Queen [2021] VSCA 213; Matamata v The King [2021]VSCA 253; Teryaki v R [2019] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258; Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Sentence: Convicted and sentenced to 3 years and 8 months imprisonment;…
-
Matamata v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 253
Citation 2
…nevertheless impose a sentence that carried with it the imposition of a non-parole period. [10] Matamata v The King [2021] VSCA 253, [75]; Loftus 43I have carefully considered all the matters raised and I am unable to accept that a sentence of under 12 months would be appropriate in your case. Clearly you have sig…
-
Fariah v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 213
Citation 3
…cing Act 1991 (Vic); Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997; Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) Cases Cited: Fariah v The Queen [2021] VSCA 213; Matamata v The King [2021]VSCA 253; Teryaki v R [2019] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Rome…
-
Jason Mammoliti v The Queen
[2020] VSCA 52
Citation 4
…9 (Vic) Cases Cited: Fariah v The Queen [2021] VSCA 213; Matamata v The King [2021]VSCA 253; Teryaki v R [2019] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258; Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Sentence: Convicted and sentenced to…
-
Teryaki v The Queen
[2019] VSCA 120
Citation 5
…e Tried) Act 1997; Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) Cases Cited: Fariah v The Queen [2021] VSCA 213; Matamata v The King [2021]VSCA 253; Teryaki v R [2019] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258; Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 C…
-
The Queen v Putra Hendra
[2014] ACTSC 102
Citation 6
…19] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258; Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Sentence: Convicted and sentenced to 3 years and 8 months imprisonment; non parole period of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment; 734 days of pre-senten…
-
Muldrock v The Queen
[2011] HCA 39
Citation 7
…253; Teryaki v R [2019] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258; Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Sentence: Convicted and sentenced to 3 years and 8 months imprisonment; non parole period of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment; 734 days o…
-
Cedic v The Queen
[2011] VSCA 258
Citation 8
…e King [2021]VSCA 253; Teryaki v R [2019] VSCA 120; Jason Mammoliti v The Queen [2020] VSCA 52; Wilson v The King [2023] VSCA 276; Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258; Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Sentence: Convicted and sentenced to 3 years and 8 months imprisonment; non parole period of 2 years and 1 m…
-
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 9
…lity because such an offender will usually have a reduced capacity to reason as to the wrongfulness of his or her actions. 29 [3] (2007) 16 VR 269; [2007] VSCA 102 (‘ Verdins ’). [4] Romero v The Queen [2011] VSCA 258, [13]. [5] (2011) 244 CLR 120 24In your case, Ms Mynard opined that when you offended your “…judg…