Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
R v Bredal
[2024] NSWCCA 75
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…more difficult it will be to establish that the circumstances are exceptional. Your counsel compared your circumstances with those in R v Bredal [2024] NSWCCA 75, where the Court ordered the immediate release of the offender.[8] Your offending has features in common with the offender in Bredal, including: a.There…
-
Woods v R
[2023] NSWCCA 37
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…y version of the principle of totality.[5] [3] Moore v R [2018] NSWCCA 26; Wilson v R [2020] NSWCCA 211; Rampley v R [2010] NSWCCA 293; and Woods v R [2023] NSWCCA 37. [4] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 20(1)(b). [5] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 19(5) and (6).…
-
Wilson v R (Cth)
[2020] NSWCCA 211
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…oncurrency or partial cumulation, which is subject to a statutory version of the principle of totality.[5] [3] Moore v R [2018] NSWCCA 26; Wilson v R [2020] NSWCCA 211; Rampley v R [2010] NSWCCA 293; and Woods v R [2023] NSWCCA 37. [4] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 20(1)(b). [5] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 19(5) and (6).…
-
Moore v R
[2018] NSWCCA 26
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…re is a presumption against concurrency or partial cumulation, which is subject to a statutory version of the principle of totality.[5] [3] Moore v R [2018] NSWCCA 26; Wilson v R [2020] NSWCCA 211; Rampley v R [2010] NSWCCA 293; and Woods v R [2023] NSWCCA 37. [4] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 20(1)(b). [5] Crimes Act 1…
-
Rampley v R
[2010] NSWCCA 293
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…n, which is subject to a statutory version of the principle of totality.[5] [3] Moore v R [2018] NSWCCA 26; Wilson v R [2020] NSWCCA 211; Rampley v R [2010] NSWCCA 293; and Woods v R [2023] NSWCCA 37. [4] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 20(1)(b). [5] Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 19(5) and (6).…