R v Mauger
[2012] NSWCCA 51
Citation 1
(Para 40)
…ion of the bond imposed by the sentencing judge. It is in that light that the observations of Harrison J in paragraph 37 should be understood. [11] [2012] NSWCCA 51 at [40] 64Your counsel relied on the principle of parity, your previous good character, your mental disorder bearing on the twin aspects of deterrence,…
Pavicevic v The Queen
[2010] ACTCA 25
Citation 2
…unequal treatment under the law, is calculated to lead to an erosion of public confidence in the integrity of the administration of justice.' [6] (1984) 154 CLR 606 [7] At pp.610-611…
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 3
…discussed the impact of these limbs except for the fifth, which is of no relevance in light of the penalties I will impose. Totality principle . [5] (2007) 16 VR 269 52Your counsel submits there is significant overlap between Charges 1 and 2. There is merit in the submission. Premiere and Wisr are common to both c…
Tsiadis v Patterson
[2001] VSCA 138
Citation 4
…numbers of small investors, general deterrence holds a place of particular significance although tempered by the fact of your disorder. [12] [1998] 4 VR 114 at 131-132 69Contrary to the prosecutor’s submission, I am satisfied your disorder contributed to your offending in that it caused you to make impulsiv…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Moroney
[2009] VSC 584
Citation 5
(Para 15)
…sentence. Only then if it appears ‘inexpedient’ to punish or punish more than nominally would a s 19B order be made.' (citations omitted). [9] [2009] VSC 584 at [15]…