-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Padreny
[2024] ACTCA 4
Citation 1
…Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634…
-
Smith v O'Dell
[2016] ACTSC 176
Citation 2
(Para 111)
…[2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 at [111]. Such rehabilitation, if it can be achieved, will be “the most durable guarantor of community protection”: Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4; 243…
-
Harlovich v Sebbens
[2023] ACTSCFC 3
Citation 3
…secutions v JSP [2020] TASCCA 3; 282 A Crim R 28 DK v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 134; 105 NSWLR 66 DPP v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49; 181 CLR 295 Fall v Vuolo [2022] ACTSC 249 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Griffiths v The Queen [1977…
-
R v Page
[2022] ACTCA 65
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…e totality principle, rehabilitation, and fault on the part of the Crown”: Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634; R v Ralston [2020] ACTCA 47; 285 A Crim R 159 at [80]. The limiting purpose of a prosecution appeal against sentence may itself be a reason for declining to grant…
-
R v Ralston
[2020] ACTCA 47
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…even where error was established: at [95]. The same conclusion was reached in relation to the Victorian provisions in R v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 ( Karazisis ), namely, that the removal of double jeopardy did not diminish the courts residual discretion to decline to intervene in a Crown sentenc…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Harwood (No 2)
[2019] TASCCA 13
Citation 6
(Para 2)
…eriod of actual imprisonment. This point was made by Ashley, Redlich and Weinberg JJA in Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350, 31 VR 634: "[103] However, as one learned commentator has pointed out, there remain many reasons, apart from double jeopardy, why, as a matter of discretion, t…
-
R v Toohey
[2019] NSWCCA 182
Citation 7
(Para 100)
…[18] These circumstances are by no means exhaustive: Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 at [100]. [19] In determining whether or not to exercise the residual discretion, it is open for the appellate court to look at material available at the time of the hearing of the appe…
-
DPP (Cth) v Besim
[2017] VSCA 158
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…throughout this country as to the principles that govern sentencing for terrorism offences.[63] [62]See, for example, R v Karazisis (2010) 2010 31 VR 634, 662-3 [127] (Ashley, Redlich and Weinberg JJA), a passage from which is set out in DPP (Cth) v MHK [2017] VSCA 157. [63] R v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550.…
-
DPP v Browning
[2016] VSCA 153
Citation 9
…[37]31 VR 634, 662–3 [127].…
-
DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd
[2015] VSCA 266
Citation 10
(Para 1)
…etion to dismiss the appeal.[29] [29] DPP (Cth) v Gregory (2011) 34 VR 1, 21 [77] (Warren CJ, Redlich JA and Ross AJA); DPP v Karazisis ( 2011) 31 VR 634, 658 [104] ( Ashley, Redlich and Weinberg JJA); Munda v Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600, 624 [72] (French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Gageler and Kean…
-
R v Reeves
[2014] NSWCCA 154
Citation 11
(Para 8)
…These circumstances are by no means exhaustive: Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 at [100].…
-
R v Cidan
[2014] NSWCCA 66
Citation 12
(Para 1)
…nt's health or mental well-being in the period between the imposition of the sentence and the hearing of the appeal: DPP v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 at [104]-[115], cited with approval in Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 at [72], footnote 71 (French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Gageler and K…
-
R v DKL
[2013] NSWCCA 233
Citation 13
(Para 1)
…nt's health or mental well-being in the period between the imposition of the sentence and the hearing of the appeal: DPP v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 at [104]-[115], cited with approval in Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 at [72], footnote 71 per French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Gageler an…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Clissold
[2023] ACTSC 250
Citation 14
(Para 111)
…he law recognises that rehabilitation must carry significant weight in the sentencing of such an offender: DPP v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 at [111]. Such rehabilitation, if it can be achieved, will be “the most durable guarantor of community protection”: Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4; 243 CLR 506 at…
-
Adams v Navaratnam
[2021] ACTSC 256
Citation 15
(Para 1)
…Court. His Honour referred to the residual discretion at [129]-[130], and the Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 and CMB . I note there is a contrary decision of Kirby v Ali [2021] ACTSC 95 ( Kirby v Ali ) where Robinson AJ doubted that this Court had a residual dis…