Schneider v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 76
Citation 1
…34 This was reaffirmed by the Court of Appeal, as recently as Tuesday of this week, in Schneider v The Queen [2016] VSCA 76, which confirmed again the line of priority from Guden v The Queen [2010] 28 VR 288, Lima da Costa v The Queen [2016] VSCA 49 and Konamala v The Queen [2016] VSCA 48, which had been referred…
Konamala v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 48
Citation 2
…which confirmed again the line of priority from Guden v The Queen [2010] 28 VR 288, Lima da Costa v The Queen [2016] VSCA 49 and Konamala v The Queen [2016] VSCA 48, which had been referred to by Mr De Vietri in the course of his plea submissions.…
Da Costa v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 49
Citation 3
…n Schneider v The Queen [2016] VSCA 76, which confirmed again the line of priority from Guden v The Queen [2010] 28 VR 288, Lima da Costa v The Queen [2016] VSCA 49 and Konamala v The Queen [2016] VSCA 48, which had been referred to by Mr De Vietri in the course of his plea submissions.…
Guden v The Queen
[2010] VSCA 196
Citation 4
…s recently as Tuesday of this week, in Schneider v The Queen [2016] VSCA 76, which confirmed again the line of priority from Guden v The Queen [2010] 28 VR 288, Lima da Costa v The Queen [2016] VSCA 49 and Konamala v The Queen [2016] VSCA 48, which had been referred to by Mr De Vietri in the course of his pl…