Harris (a pseudonym) v The King
[2024] VSCA 43
Citation 1
…uer (2018) 266 CLR 56 – Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 228 – TL v The King (2022) 275 CLR 83 – Harris v The King [2024] VSCA 43 – CGL v DPP (2010) 24 VR 486 Ruling: Tendency evidence admissible – Application for severance refused…
TL v The King
[2022] HCA 35
Citation 2
…d: Evidence Act 2008 Cases Cited: R v Bauer (2018) 266 CLR 56 – Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 228 – TL v The King (2022) 275 CLR 83 – Harris v The King [2024] VSCA 43 – CGL v DPP (2010) 24 VR 486 Ruling: Tendency evidence admissible – Application for severance refused…
R v Bauer
[2018] HCA 40
Citation 3
…ction of jury – Whether severance of complainants appropriate Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2008 Cases Cited: R v Bauer (2018) 266 CLR 56 – Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 228 – TL v The King (2022) 275 CLR 83 – Harris v The King [2024] VSCA 43 – CGL v DPP (2010) 24 VR 486 Ruling: Tendency evidence admissible –…
Hughes v The Queen
[2017] HCA 20
Citation 4
…lainants appropriate Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2008 Cases Cited: R v Bauer (2018) 266 CLR 56 – Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 228 – TL v The King (2022) 275 CLR 83 – Harris v The King [2024] VSCA 43 – CGL v DPP (2010) 24 VR 486 Ruling: Tendency evidence admissible – Application for severance refused…
Velkoski v The Queen
[2014] VSCA 121
Citation 5
…39]–[40] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA). See also Velkoski v The Queen (2014) 45 VR 680, 697 [76] (Redlich, Weinberg and Coghlan JJA). [19] Velkoski 697 [79]. 60 Harris (a pseudonym) v The King (‘ Harris ’)[20] was a multi-complainant case in which the prosecution sought to rely on charged and uncharged a…
CGL v DPP
[2010] VSCA 26
Citation 6
…s v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 228 – TL v The King (2022) 275 CLR 83 – Harris v The King [2024] VSCA 43 – CGL v DPP (2010) 24 VR 486 Ruling: Tendency evidence admissible – Application for severance refused…
R v Papamitrou
[2004] VSCA 12
Citation 7
…he two sets of charges; and (c) The jury will need to consider different issues in dispute in respect of some of the charges. [10] See R v Papamitrou (2004) 7 VR 375, 388 (Winneke P, Ormiston and Buchanan JJA agreeing).…
De Jesus v The Queen
[1986] HCA 65
Citation 8
…missibility of the tendency evidence.[26] [26] See R v Bright (a Pseudonym) (2014) 45 VR 744, 756 [52] (Beach JA and Lasry AJA); De Jesus v The Queen (1986) 61 ALJR 1, 2–4 (Gibbs CJ), 4–7 (Mason and Deane JJ), 7 (Brennan J), 9–10 (Dawson J). 67The primary issue in this trial is whether the conduct comprising the ch…
Gipp v The Queen
[1998] HCATrans 212
Citation 9
…ges involving CD and EF and the likely effectiveness of any jury directions I might give in order to overcome that prejudice.[25] [25] R v TJB [1998] 4 VR 621. 66In order to rule on the severance application, I must first determine the admissibility of the tendency evidence.[26] [26] See R v Bright (a Pseud…