Director of Public Prosecutions v Ho (Ruling No 15)
[2009] VSC 399
•10 June 2009
| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted | |
CRIMINAL DIVISION
No. 1485 of 2006
| DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (COMMONWEALTH) |
| v |
| KAM TIN HO & ORS |
---
JUDGE: | CUMMINS J | |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne | |
DATE OF HEARING: | 10 June 2009 | |
DATE OF RULING: | 10 June 2009 | |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | DPP v Ho & Ors (Ruling No 15) | |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2009] VSC 399 | Revised 19 October 2009 |
---
Criminal law and procedure – Jury trial – Slavery – Sex workers – Commonwealth Criminal Code s 270.3(1)(a) and (c) – Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988 (Cth) s 31(1) – Discharge of foreperson – Section 48B Juries Act 2000 – Medical reason therefor.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Director | Mr D Gurvich with Mr R Davis | Director of Public Prosecutions |
| For the Accused Kam Tim Ho | Mr J Dickinson SC | Theo Magazis & Associates |
| For the Accused Ho Kam Ho | Mr J Montgomery SC | Slades & Parsons |
| For the Accused Hoo | Mr J Bisas | Michael J Gleeson & Associates Pty Ltd |
| For the Accused Rahardjo | Mr L Hartnett | Robert Stary & Associates |
-----------------
Ruling No.15
HIS HONOUR:
I consider that it was necessary to discharge the Foreperson because of her advanced state of pregnancy. A medical certificate from her obstetrician will be provided to the court tomorrow but it cannot be signed by her obstetrician today. Pursuant to s.43B Juries Act 2000 and for that reason, I discharged the Foreperson. I understand the jury has chosen a replacement Foreperson, it now being a 14 person jury.
---
0
0
0