R v Saleh
[2017] SASCFC 75
Citation 1
…e prosecution or defence contentions proven. Your counsel, Mr Edney, on the last occasion provided me with a South Australian decision of R v Saleh [2017] SASCFC 75, a decision which I have found helpful in embarking on this analysis. In that decision, Appeal Justice Stanley said as follows:…
Filippou v The Queen
[2015] HCA 29
Citation 2
(Para 69)
…[1] R v Saleh [2017] SASCFC 75 para [55]; see also Filippou v R (2015) 256 CLR 47 at [69] to [70], and Weininger v R (2003) 212 CLR 629 at [636] to [638]…
William Hladik v The Queen
[2015] VSCA 149
Citation 3
…. I am satisfied that Autism Spectrum Disorder is an impairment to which the Verdins principles have applicability.[4] See the decision of Hladik v R [2015] VSCA 149. Whilst I am satisfied that there is a link between your deficits in relation to poor coping and social skills, reciprocal communication, acting on i…
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 4
…[3] Verdins, Buckley, Vo (2007) 16 VR 269…
Weininger v The Queen
[2003] HCA 14
Citation 5
(Para 69)
…[1] R v Saleh [2017] SASCFC 75 para [55]; see also Filippou v R (2015) 256 CLR 47 at [69] to [70], and Weininger v R (2003) 212 CLR 629 at [636] to [638]…
R v Olbrich
[1999] HCA 54
Citation 6
(Para 337)
…14 This principle was approved in the High Court decision of R v Olbrich (1999) 166 ALR 330 at [337].…
Pearce v The Queen
[1998] HCA 57
Citation 7
(Para 369)
…13 With respect to the standard of proof in sentencing regarding contested matters, the majority in R v Storey [1998] 1 VR 359 at [369] indicated that a sentencing judge:…
The Queen v Kilic
[2016] HCATrans 240
Citation 8
…the Sentencing Advisory Council for the offence of causing serious injury intentionally. I have also considered the High Court decision of R v Kilic (2016) 259 CLR 256, a relatively recent decision of the High Court which dealt with sentencing for intentionally cause serious injury (there by fire) and contained a di…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Winton
[2016] VCC 1390
Citation 9
…16 In the course of submissions before me, Mr Albert referred me to reasons for sentence of her Honour Judge Hampel in DPP v Winton [2016] VCC 1390, a decision of this court from 2016, as an example of such a scenario. In that case, her Honour was not persuaded on the balance of probabilities in relation to matter…