R v Fuller
[2010] NSWCCA 192
Citation 1
…sonment, as I have said, indicates the Court regards this as serious offending – see Gajjar at [42]. Regarding the maximum penalty, in R v Fuller [2010] NSWCCA 192, the Court stated:…
DPP (Cth) v Hizhnikov
[2008] VSCA 269
Citation 2
…e is a primary sentencing consideration when sentencing for this offending, as has been stated by the Courts, including in Gajjar and DPP v Hizhnikov [2008] VSCA 269. In the latter, the Court of Appeal approved the statements of principle on reasoning in Western Australia v Collier (2007) 178 A Crim R 310.…
R v Gajjar
[2008] VSCA 268
Citation 3
(Para 64)
…82 I was also referred to the decision of R v Gajjar [2008] VSCA 268 at [64].…
Tector v R
[2008] NSWCCA 151
Citation 4
…104 In Tector v R [2008] NSWCCA 151 the Court stated that:…
The State of Western Australia v Collier
[2007] WASCA 250
Citation 5
…rts, including in Gajjar and DPP v Hizhnikov [2008] VSCA 269. In the latter, the Court of Appeal approved the statements of principle on reasoning in Western Australia v Collier (2007) 178 A Crim R 310.…
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 6
…66 Ms Kothrakis, was not relying upon the principles of R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269, specifically the restatement of the Tsiaris (1996) 1 VR 398 Principles 1 and 2. This was an appropriate concession.…