Director of Public Prosecutions v Dessmann
[2024] VCC 1627
•18 October 2024
| IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA | Revised Not Restricted Suitable for Publication |
AT MELBOURNE
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR 23-00513
| DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS |
| v |
| EDWARD DESSMANN |
---
JUDGE: | HER HONOUR JUDGE QUIN |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
DATE OF HEARING: | 30 September 2024 |
DATE OF SENTENCE: | 18 October 2024 |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | DPP v Dessmann |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2024] VCC 1627 |
REASONS FOR SENTENCE
---
Subject: CRIMINAL LAW
Catchwords: Charges of make threat to kill, intentionally cause injury, persistent contravention family violence order, attempt to pervert the course of justice – prior criminal history
Legislation Cited:
Cases Cited:
Sentence:Total effective sentence of 66 months imprisonment. Non-parole period of 3 years and 6 months.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Director of Public Prosecutions | Mr M. Wilson | Office of Public Prosecutions |
For the Accused | Mr B. Barratt | James Dowsley & Associates |
HER HONOUR:
1Edward Dessmann, on 4 July 2024, a jury found you guilty of the following offences:
(a)make a threat to kill (Charge 1);
(b)two counts of intentionally cause injury (Charges 4 and 8);
(c)persistent contravention of a family violence order (Charge 7);
(d)two charges of attempt to pervert the course of justice (Charges 10
and 11).
2A jury found you not guilty of two counts of assault (Charges 2 and 3) and attempt to pervert the course of justice (Charge 6). Charges 5 and 9 were alternatives to Charges 4 and 8.
3The maximum penalties for Charges 1, 4 and 8 is 10 years; Charge 7, five years; and Charges 10 and 11, 25 years.
4I received written sentencing submissions from both counsel. They agreed the only appropriate sentence was the imposition of a head sentence and non-parole period.
5As to the factual circumstances relating to the trial indictment, this offending relates to your ex-partners Kathryn Hogan and Nicola Clow.
6You met Ms Hogan in 2010, and had a child together, Alyssia, in November 2014. In about August 2017, you commenced a relationship with Ms Clow whilst you and Ms Hogan were still living in Gladstone Park. By that time, your relationship with Ms Hogan had become tumultuous.
7On Friday 13 October 2017, Ms Hogan was with Alyssia in the kitchen when you returned to the house with a friend, Mr Galluzzo. Later that day, you argued with Ms Hogan and took a knife from the knife block in the kitchen, walked up next to her and told her you wanted to kill her and wanted her out of your life. That is Charge 1, a threat to kill.
8You had another argument with Ms Hogan on Sunday 15 October 2017, as you had discovered she was wanting to take Alyssia back to New Zealand with her to live. You left the house in the afternoon and returned in the early hours of Monday 16 October. Ms Hogan had been sleeping in the main bedroom when she was awoken by you. You continued arguing about her returning to New Zealand with Alyssia, demanding that she could not. At some stage, you walked away from Ms Hogan and began cuddling Alyssia. You began arguing again with Ms Hogan and then went over towards the bed and punched her in the mouth, causing swelling to the inside of her top lip and a small abrasion under the top lip. That is Charge 4. You then calmed down and went to sleep.
9When Ms Hogan awoke, she noticed your assault had caused her to have a swollen lip. She left the house with Alyssia. On 18 October 2017, Ms Hogan was detained at Melbourne airport while trying to board a flight to New Zealand with Alyssia, because of family law proceedings. She reported your assault to a federal police officer and was then taken to the police station where she provided a statement regarding the assault and photos of her injuries were taken.
10In respect of the offences against Nicola Clow, as noted, you commenced a relationship with her in around August 2017, which continued until
January 2018. Around that time, you were arguing, and Ms Clow, on
7 January 2018, had made a statement to police about an incident on that day. She later withdrew her complaint, and police did not charge you, but they did apply for and were granted an intervention order.11On 22 February 2018, the court made an interim intervention order against you that listed Ms Clow as the protected person and included a condition that you not contact her.
12Can we have that person please turn their sound off.
13On 23 February 2018, Ms Clow lodged an application to vary the interim intervention order to enable her to have contact with you. The hearing for the variation application was listed for 9 March 2018.
14As to the persistent contravention of an intervention order, in the period from 24 February 2018 to 8 March 2018, you contravened the intervention order by making phone contact with Ms Clow on more than three occasions or as set out in the table of prosecution opening for trial. You made phone calls to her on a daily basis – over the period, a total of 106 calls, 104 calls of which were from different numbers, neither of them registered to you.
15In the period after the intervention order was varied, Ms Clow alternated between staying at your place and at her parents' house. On about 2 April 2018, after a further argument between you, Ms Clow left your house and returned to her parents' house. She spoke to you on the phone over the next couple of days, but you had further arguments on the phone, and she ceased calling you.
16On Saturday 7 April 2018, between 5.20 and 6.26, you made 13 phone calls to her which were either unanswered or went to voicemail. Just before 8 o'clock, while she was driving to work, she answered a call from you. You accused her of taking your phone. She denied she had your phone but indicated she had some other belongings of yours and would drop them off at your house. You insisted on coming to her workplace and called her another 16 times.
17She left the medical clinic where she worked at about 11.45 to go to her parents' house. In the period from 12 until one, you phoned Ms Clow numerous times, and ultimately she agreed to meet you in a public place near Chapel Street, South Yarra, which was close to her workplace.
18Shortly before 1 pm, Ms Clow parked her car in River Street, South Yarra. She got out of her car and spoke to you, as you had approached her by foot. You again accused her of having your phone. She allowed you to check inside her car, and you then both went back to your car, which was close by, and sat in it talking. You then walked back to her car together. Ms Clow got into the driver's seat. The driver's door was partially open, and you were standing on the street next to the driver's door. You leant inside her car and tried to grab her handbag. She held onto the bag and started screaming. A struggle ensued, in the course of which you bit her on the face (Charge 8, intentionally cause injury). Ms Clow then bit your lip, and you got off her.
19Ms Clow sustained some bruising and swelling to her cheek and lip, and she had bite marks on her lip.
20Some people in the café opposite to where you were came to her assistance when they heard her screaming. As they approached, you were complaining that she had bitten you. One of them told you to walk away. They observed Ms Clow was distressed and offered to take her to the police. Shortly after 1 o'clock, Ms Clow went to Prahran police station and made a statement regarding the assault, and her injuries were photographed.
21You had sustained some bleeding from the bite to your lip. At about 2 pm, you went to the medical clinic where Ms Clow worked and were treated by a doctor. You then had telephone contact as follows:
(a)you called Ms Clow 4 times between 1.06 and 1.19 pm;
(b)you then you called Jacob Kilmister, though that call was not answered;
(c)you then called Ms Clow again five times between 1.47 and 1.59;
(d)at 2.36, you received a call from Mr Kilmister and then had four more calls with him;
(e)you also received a text message from him telling you that he was on his way to see you.
22At about 4 o'clock, you and Mr Kilmister arrived at Broadmeadows police station together. Each of you provided a sworn statement to police relating to the incident earlier that day.
23Your statement relevantly asserted that Mr Kilmister was with you shortly before and after the physical altercation with Ms Clow. You said you were 'unsure' if Mr Kilmister had witnessed your interactions with Ms Clow and that Mr Kilmister approached you in the street very shortly after the incident. He told you that you were bleeding and that Ms Clow was the aggressor in the altercation.
24By making those statements to police, you implicitly asserted that Mr Kilmister may well have witnessed the altercation. The verdict on Charge 10 means that the jury accepted that that implicit assertion was false because
Mr Kilmister was not present at the altercation, could not have been an eyewitness and knew that to be the case. The verdict on Charge 8, which found you intentionally caused injury to Ms Clow and rejected your claim of self-defence, meant the jury accepted your assertion in your statement that Ms Clow was the aggressor was also false.25In Mr Kilmister's sworn statement to police, made shortly after you made yours, he relevantly asserted he had witnessed the altercation, that Ms Clow was the aggressor, and she appeared to headbutt you.
26Your intentional encouragement of Mr Kilmister to make his false statement, and your intention that both your own and Mr Kilmister's conduct would pervert the course of justice, was accepted by the jury on the basis of you contacting Mr Kilmister shortly after the altercation, the two of you travelling together to Broadmeadows police and the similarities in your account.
27The verdict on Charge 11 means the jury accepted that the above statements by Mr Kilmister were false and that you intentionally encouraged him to commit the offence by making these false statements. In the same manner as in Charge 10, both your own and Mr Kilmister's conduct had a tendency to pervert the course of justice, as it created a real risk of interfering with the course of justice, as it could deflect the police from prosecuting a criminal offence against you, if Ms Clow had made an allegation, and deflect the police from putting forward evidence of the true facts in any proceeding that might arise from the filing of any criminal charges, whether against you or against Ms Clow.
28On 8 April 2018, Broadmeadows police requested Ms Clow attend at the station. She did. She was arrested, interviewed, and later charged with assaulting you. The sworn statements made by you and Mr Kilmister formed part of the brief of evidence on which those charges were based. The charges were later withdrawn following this investigation.
29I turn, then, to the plea indictment.
30On 9 July, you pleaded guilty to the following offences:
(a)prohibited person possessing a firearm; and
(b)intentionally cause injury.
31The maximum penalty in respect of each of those offences is 10 years.
32The circumstances of this offending occurred after the matters the subject of the trial, and the details are set out in summary of prosecution opening dated 23 September 2024 (Exhibit A). That offending related to a time when Tianna Dessmann, your daughter, visited you in Melbourne in 2019 and can be summarised as follows.
33On Saturday 11 May 2019, Ms Dessmann flew into Melbourne and was collected by you in your partner's car. You discussed with her a boy she liked, and you told her you would always protect her. You told Ms Dessmann to look inside a satchel bag that was in the car, which she did, and she saw a handgun with a magazine containing bullets. You then took the magazine out of the handgun and placed the gun and magazine on her lap (Charge 1, prohibited person possessing a firearm). You told her to take a photo of the gun and magazine on her lap and another photo of herself holding the gun and send them to the boy, but to delete them straight away. She did so, and she sent them to him and then saved to the 'my eyes only' function on Snapchat.
34You were a prohibited person because, at the relevant time, you were the subject of a final intervention order dated 4 December 2017 (of duration five years), where a former partner of yours, Stephanie Skok, was named as the protected person.
35The photograph of the gun on Ms Dessmann's lap shows a Melior brand handgun. Investigators later analysed your phone, which showed web searches and photos of a relevant handgun.
36You and your daughter continued to have issues during her stay with you. On one occasion, you became angry and grabbed her phone then threw it, hitting your son Dominic on the head. On Friday 17 May 2019, Ms Dessmann was talking to your partner and told her things that her mother had said about you. You questioned your partner about these discussions.
37The next morning, you confronted Ms Dessmann about what she had said. You abused her and swore at her for saying those things to your partner. After returning home, she went upstairs to her bedroom. You were angry at her for spending money to recharge her phone. She told you she wanted to go home to Queensland. You grabbed the phone out of her hand and kept pushing her down on the bed. She fell off the bed onto the floor. You then kicked her in the ribs, causing her pain to her ribs. This conduct is the commencement of Charge 2, which is a rolled-up charge of intentionally cause injury. She extended her legs to maintain distance from you. You then delivered a strong punch to the middle of her right thigh, causing bruising and immediate numbness.
38Throughout the assaults, Ms Dessmann was asking you to stop. You continued to abuse and swear at her. You went back in the room after you heard her yelling at your partner. You told her you would sort her out and then you began poking the side of her head with some kitchen tongs, which caused some redness and swelling to her ear.
39At some point during this series of assaults, you went back upstairs and grabbed her handbag. You used the bag to repeatedly hit her on the head, and the buckle eventually broke. Ms Dessmann felt strong pain, sustained several lumps on her head and had a loose front tooth. That is the end of the conduct constituting Charge 2. She told you she wanted to go back to Queensland, and you continued to abuse her and told she could not. You had her phone in her possession.
40On Sunday 19 May, Dominic, your son, spoke to you, and you ultimately allowed him to take her to the airport to go home. When she returned to her mother, she was observed to be highly distressed, and she had injuries including a swollen lip and bruise to her thigh. She went to a medical centre on the Gold Coast, and a doctor noted injuries including bruises on the right thigh and wrists; tenderness to the right lower chest wall; a tooth being pushed back; and acute soft tissue injuries to the head, leg and chest wall. Her injuries were later photographed by police.
41On 5 August 2019, you were arrested and interviewed at Broadmeadows police station in respect of these matters, and you made no admissions.
Victim impact statements
42I received victim impact statements from Kathryn Hogan (Exhibit C) – that was read to the court by the prosecutor – and Tianna Dessmann (Exhibit D). She attended court and read the statement herself. No statement was received by Ms Clow, though that is not to say your offending did not impact her, particularly given that she was charged by police as a consequence of your false statement.
43In respect of Ms Hogan, your offending has impacted her general feeling of well-being and enjoyment of life. She has deliberately isolated herself from others, which has led her to experience loneliness, disconnection and negatively impacted her mental health. She notes the changes in her personality: she was once confident and happy, now feels anxious and grappling with emotions of sadness, emptiness and hopelessness. She is distrustful of men and fearful of entering into a new relationship. She is plagued by self-doubt and lacking motivation.
44In respect of Ms Dessmann, she recalls hoping to reconnect with you when she was aged 15, but that instead of receiving comfort and support, she was confronted with betrayal that has resulted in her experiencing an everlasting state of distress. This has related to her physical but also her psychological and emotional well-being, with the latter being described by her as profound and enduring. She suffers PTSD, nightmares and flashbacks and has engaged in self-harming behaviours, the scars of which are a reminder to her of your conduct. She has difficulty trusting others and your offending has impacted her progress through education and work.
Personal circumstances
45I turn, then, to your own personal circumstances. I was provided with the following material filed on your behalf:
(a)the report of Gina Cidoni, psychologist, dated 25 September 2024;
(b)unsigned letter from Dr Andrew Astor dated 29 October 2021;
(c)unsigned letter from Dr Andrew Astor dated 10 October 2024 from Melbourne Rheumatology;
(d)letter from Dr Bill Panos, SIA Medical Centre, dated 11 October 2024.
46I was informed that your father, your partner Kellie, and a friend were in court to support you.
47You were born and raised in Melbourne by migrant parents. They are both in their 80s. You are the eldest of four children and have a good relationship with all family members. You have a son from a previous relationship, Dominic, now aged 28, and he gave evidence on your behalf in the trial. You had another son and daughter with your ex-wife. A family violence order was taken out in respect of these family members, and you have no contact with them. Two other ex-partners were the subject of the charges in the trial, Kathryn Hogan and Nicola Clow.
48You have been with your current partner since 2021, and I was informed that she remains supportive of you.
49You completed school but did not follow up with any further studies. You have had various jobs in hospitality and renovating homes. You have been on a disability pension for the last 12 months given the impact of your physical health and pain experienced with CREST syndrome.
50You have spent your time in custody productively, being able to be a painting billet, though you have somewhat limited capacity given your physical health issues.
Physical health
51In Dr Oster's report dated 29 October 2021, it is indicated that you suffer from active limited cutaneous system sclerosis or CREST syndrome, that you have this ongoing disease with pain, stiffness and swelling of fingers and loss off function and dexterity. The condition makes daily activities difficult for you at times. You also have trouble with your legs and feet.
52In the updated material, Dr Oster confirmed that you are troubled by ongoing pain, stiffness, swelling and ulceration of the hands and feet with reduced mobility, dexterity and strength. You require long-term therapy, though your condition does not respond well to treatment.
53As to your mental health, you revealed to Ms Cidoni that you had suffered serious sexual abuse at the hands of a priest when you were a young altar boy (see paragraph 56). You also indicated other traumatic incidents in your life (see paragraph 51). I was informed that you only recently revealed this child abuse and are exploring legal options in relation to it.
54You reported to Ms Cidoni that since you have been incarcerated, your mental health and physical health have deteriorated. You reported symptoms of bad dreams, heightened anxiety and fear, which you attributed to a combination of PTSD and your autoimmune condition.
55On the basis of your self-report and relevant testing, Ms Cidoni diagnosed you as suffering persistent depression disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality traits and alcohol use disorder, the latter in sustained remission. She opined that you exhibit symptoms of each of these conditions, including hyperarousal, avoidance behaviour and a pervasive pattern of stable [sic] interpersonal relationships, impulsivity, emotional dysregulation, and reacting with intense anger and aggression.
56Your counsel submitted, as a consequence, Verdins is engaged, a matter to which I will return.
57You commenced drinking alcohol and using cannabis when you were about 15. You also used recreational drugs of MDMA, ecstasy, cocaine and methylamphetamine from your early 20s. You do not consider that you have any problematic use of either alcohol or drugs, and you have never had any treatment in respect of either.
58You have a number of prior convictions from New South Wales, Queensland and this State. You were imprisoned in 2005 for nine months as a consequence of firearm, driving and violent offences, including one charge of recklessly cause serious injury for a period of nine months. Of particular relevance, on 21 September 2016, you were convicted of persistent contravention of a family violence intervention order and placed on community correction order for 12 months – this related to a previous partner (see footnote 8 in the prosecution submissions) – and on 26 October 2016 of using a carriage service to make a threat to cause serious harm, and you were convicted and fined $750.
59You also have a number of subsequent matters:
(a)on 27 November 2019, contravention of intervention order regarding Kathryn Hogan (see footnote 9 in the prosecution submissions);
(b)on 29 November 2019, at Waverley Court in New South Wales, a conviction for stalking, and fined $1,000;
(c)on 2 December 2022 and 6 December 2022, relating to offending against Ms Hogan and another partner Nada Peters (see footnotes 10 and 11).
60You are not to be punished again for these matters, but they are relevant to your rehabilitation prospects and specific deterrence.
Delay
61There has been some delay in the trial matters coming to court, having occurred between November 2017 and April 2018; that is, more than five years ago. I take into account that you have had these matters hanging over your head.
Verdins
62Your counsel submitted that your childhood abuse was likely to have disrupted your emotional regulation, self-worth and trust in others. He relied on
Ms Cidoni's opinion that your abuse may have led you to internalise feelings of anger, fear and helplessness which manifested later in life as implausibility [sic], aggression or seeking control through negative behaviours such as this offending (see paragraph 101).63It was submitted that the necessary connection to the offending and your psychological condition was established and that I should accept that opinion, such that your moral culpability for this offending should be reduced. The prosecution disputed that the evidentiary connection had been established between your condition and the offending; that Ms Cidoni's opinion was based to some extent on your own self-report, and given some of the other material you provided to her, I should question the veracity or truthfulness of it or be cautious as to accepting any opinion based on it; that you were not a reliable historian.
64I accept that you suffer from psychological conditions as set out in Ms Cidoni's report. I note she was not required for cross-examination by the prosecution. The connection to your condition and your offending, I regard as limited, particularly in respect of your most serious offending, relating to your attempt to interfere in criminal proceedings. That could not be said to be an expression of uncontrolled anger, as arguably your other offending might. You persisted in maintaining your account to police, intent on having Ms Clow charged on a completely false basis, and you did not attempt to withdraw it.
65I accept your psychological conditions make custody more burdensome for you than others who do not have the same conditions and that those conditions may deteriorate in custody. Further, I take into account in a similar way your physical health and associated difficulties you experience with CREST.
Plea of guilty, re: plea matters
66I take into account you pleaded guilty to the matters on the plea indictment. There is a utilitarian value in your plea, and your daughter has not been required to give evidence. However, it could not be said your plea is indicative of remorse. From your outburst in court whilst she was reading her victim impact statement, it was apparent that you are not remorseful. That does not aggravate your offending. However, it is not a matter that can be put on your behalf in mitigation.
Objective gravity
67All of your offending occurred in a domestic violence context directed to your partner, ex-partner, or your daughter. The impact on them has been significant.
68In respect of Ms Hogan, you were holding a knife in close proximity to her. The offending occurred in her home. The assault occurred in the early hours of the morning and was at a time when you had commenced family law proceedings.
69In respect of Ms Clow, you assaulted her in her car when she was in a vulnerable position, being in an enclosed space. Charges were actually laid against her; she was arrested and interviewed by police. You recruited someone else to assist you and to give credence to your false account. Your actions were planned and premeditated, and you were clearly prepared to stick to your statement for a period after it was made despite the potential serious consequences for Ms Clow.
70In respect of Ms Dessmann, your conduct involved a significant abuse of trust. Your 15-year-old daughter was seeking your help and guidance. You engaged in a series of assaults on her and assumed control of the situation, taking her phone and denying her request to return home to her mother.
71It was accepted by the parties that none of the victims suffered significant physical injuries as a consequence of your assaults and that the firearm was not connected to known criminal activities or associates.
Rehabilitation
72You have a significant history of family violence offending. Your rehabilitation prospects are guarded and clearly dependent on you dealing with your psychological, anger and violence issues. Ms Cidoni opined that your risk of violent reoffending is moderate and – from the court's perspective, more concerningly – your risk of family violence recidivism is very high in respect of both those categories of offending without any support.
Sentencing principles
73Women who involve themselves in a relationship are entitled to feel safe both physically and emotionally in that situation. They should be protected from violence, harassment, abuse and threats from a dominant and controlling partner. Any violence in the domestic context is serious, but particularly against your vulnerable 15-year-old daughter, that conduct is deserving of significant punishment. Your preparedness and determination to interfere with proper administration of justice was consistent with your attitude to those who you wanted to control. General deterrence, just punishment and denunciation are important considerations. As previously indicated, specific deterrence is also relevant and an important matter. These matters must be balanced against matters personal to you and delay as set out above.
74I was informed that you have a period in custody, known as Renzella time, and I take that into account. I also take into account principles of totality and a recognition that your offending involved three different victims.
75If you could please stand.
76Dealing first with the trial presentment, in respect of Charge 1, threat to kill, you are convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six months.
77In respect of Charge 4, intentionally cause injury, you are convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of three months.
78In respect of Charge 7, persistent contravention of a family violence order, you are convicted and sentenced to three months.
79In respect of intentionally cause injury, Charge 8, you are convicted and sentenced to eight months.
80In respect of Charge 10, attempt to pervert the course of justice, you are convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of four years.
81In respect of Charge 11, attempting to pervert the course of justice, you are convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of four years.
82In relation to the plea presentment, you are convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six months in respect of Charge 1 and four months in respect of Charge 2.
83Six months of the sentence imposed on Charge 1 on the trial indictment, two months of the sentence imposed on Charge 8 on the trial indictment, seven months of the sentence imposed on Charge 11 on the trial indictment and three months on the sentence imposed on the plea indictment will be cumulative on the base sentence of four years for Charge 10.
84That gives a total effective sentence of 66 months, which is five years and six months.
85I set a non-parole period of three years and six months.
86What is the pre-sentence detention, please?
87MR WILSON: One hundred and six days, not including today.
88HER HONOUR: Thank you. I declare pre-sentence detention of 106 days.
89In respect of the plea indictment, pursuant to s6AAA of the Sentencing Act, if you had not pleaded guilty to that matter, I would have imposed a term of imprisonment of 12 months for those matters.
90Anything else?
91MR WILSON: The forfeiture orders that were sent through to Your Honour's associate that were not opposed.
92HER HONOUR: Yes, all right. I will make those orders, thank you.
93MR WILSON: Yes.
94HER HONOUR: Thank you, thanks. I will stand down.
‑ ‑ ‑
| 1 | Threat to kill 13/10/17 (Kathryn Hogan) | 10 years | 12m | 6m |
| 4 | Intentionally cause injury 16/10/17 (hitting Kathryn Hogan’s mouth) | 10 years | 3m | |
| 7 | Persistent contravention of family violence intervention order 24/2/18 to 8/3/18 (making phone contact with protected person Nicola Clow on at least 3 occasions) | 5 years | 3m | |
| 8 | Intentionally cause injury 7/4/18 (biting Nicola Clow’s face) | 10 years | 6m | 2m |
| 10 | Attempt to pervert the course of justice 7/4/18 (Offender statement re 7/4/18 incident with Nicola Clow) | 25 years’ imprisonment (Crimes Act 1958, s 320) | 4y | 4y |
| 11 | Attempt to pervert the course of justice 7/4/18 (Encouraging Jacob Kilmister statement re 7/4/18 incident with Nicola Clow) | 25 years’ imprisonment (Crimes Act 1958, s 320) | 4y | 6m |
| 1 | Prohibited person possess firearm 11/5/19 (Melior handgun) | 10 years | 6m | 2m |
| 2 | Intentionally cause injury 18/5/19 (rolled up charge relating to multiple assaults and injuries to Tianna Dessmann) | 10 years | 4m |
0
0
0