DPP v Howard
[2021] VSCA 298
Citation 1
…nym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 300
Citation 2
…The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (2018) 349 ALR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2016] VSCA 148; Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
Zhao v The Queen
[2018] VSCA 267
Citation 3
…148; Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
DPP v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym)
[2016] VSCA 148
Citation 4
…Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (2018) 349 ALR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2016] VSCA 148; Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
GEM v The Queen
[2010] VSCA 168
Citation 5
…evidence before me, that is as far as it got, and your barrister did not argue otherwise. [15] AWF [4] per Ormiston J; see also GEM v The Queen [2010] VSCA 168 [54]. Covid conditions in custody 62I take into account, and mitigate your sentence to a degree, on account of the lingering consequences of measures to me…
Cheung v The Queen
[2001] HCA 67
Citation 6
…Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (2018) 349 ALR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2016] VSCA 148; Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
R v AWF
[2000] VSCA 172
Citation 7
…Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2016] VSCA 148; Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
Pearce v The Queen
[1998] HCA 57
Citation 8
…ells me in any event a conclusion that digital penetration is less invasive than penile penetration is not one I should draw.[9] [9] R v L [1998] 1 VR 551. 31I note that the circumstances of Charge 6 infuse your abuse with a transactional quality when you hand Stephanie money, a fact I find beyond reasonabl…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nenna (a pseudonym)
[2022] VCC 1550
Citation 9
…(2018) 349 ALR 1; DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2016] VSCA 148; Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 1550; R v AWF (2000) 2 VR 1; 4; Zhao v The Queen [2018] VSCA 267; DPP v Howard [2021] VSCA 298.…
DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym)
[2019] VCC 1512
Citation 10
…properly reflect the degree of criminality involved.[18] [17] Geoffrey Boxer (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 300 ; DPP v Nenna (a pseudonym) [2019] VCC 1512 ; DPP v Hector Howard (a pseudonym) [2021] VSCA 298. [18] Dalgliesh 1 [131]. 76This sentence is required to be, and will be, one more increment in that…