Robert Stanojlovic v Director of Public Prosecutions (on behalf of Steven Emil Kokas) and County Court of Victoria
[2018] VSCA 152
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…s that are derived from He Kaw Teh were further considered and summarised by the Victorian Court of Appeal in the case of Stanojlovic v DPP :[13] [13][2018] VSCA 152 ( Stanojlovic ).…
Momcilovic v The Queen
[2011] HCA 34
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…ccountable to the electorate.[21] [20] Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, [78]. [21] Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1, [43].…
Police v Beukes
[2011] SASC 9
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…ce v Beukes [15] (the persuasive, but not binding authority) which dealt with the offence of contravening a domestic violence intervention order. [15][2011] SASC 9 (‘ Beukes ’).…
CTM v The Queen
[2008] HCA 25
Citation 4
…[6](2008) 236 CLR 440, 483–4 [148].…
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority
[1998] HCA 53
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…cal language would be used so that Parliament may be accountable to the electorate.[21] [20] Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, [78]. [21] Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1, [43].…
He Kaw Teh v The Queen
[1985] HCA 43
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…d in legislation as an element of an offence for it to exist. It is presumed. This presumption, however, may be displaced. [4] He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523, 528 (‘ He Kaw Teh ’).…
Proudman v Dayman
[1941] HCA 28
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…t he had an honest and reasonable belief in a set of facts at the time which, if they existed, would have made him innocent of the offence.[41] [41](1941) 67 CLR 536.…
Azadzoi v County Court
[2013] VSC 161
Citation 9
(Para 1)
…a person to be guilty of a crime without some element of mental fault, such as intention or knowledge”.[5] [5] Azadzoi v County Court of Victoria [2013] VSC 161, [22].…