Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Caulfield

Director of Public Prosecutions v Caulfield

Case [2018] VCC 2213

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Caulfield [2018] VCC 2213
Case: [2018] VCC 2213
Decision Date: 20 December 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Caulfield [2018] VCC 2213

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Chiu [2019] VCC 1719

Cases Citing This Decision

DPP v Caulfield [2019] VSCA 131
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…also specifically noted that the respondent had not repaid any of the money taken throughout the period of the offending. [1] DPP v Caulfield [2018] VCC 2213 (Judge Cohen) (‘Reasons’) [6]. [2]Reasons [7].…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Chiu [2019] VCC 1719
Citation 2

…d [30], a decision provided by your counsel, I was not provided with any decisions which were said to be similar to your case. [30] DPP v Caulfield [2018] VCC 2213 74I accept that your case represents a most unusual combination of circumstances and factors, making a resort to current sentencing practices of limite…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Thorpe v The Queen [2016] VSCA 158
Citation 1

…time reading out case names and citations here. [2] Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Thorpe v R [2016] VSCA 158; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; 53Some sentences in cases of this nature have involved wholly non-custodial sentences, in the form of CCOs, since the abo…
Melnikas v The Queen [2016] VSCA 112
Citation 2

…Cases Cited: Boulton & Ors v R [2014] VSCA 342; R v Grossi [2008] VSCA 51; R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Sentence: 9 months imprisonment followed by 2 year CCO ---…
and Jo-Anne Finch v Arnold Thomas and Becker Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 2
Citation 3

…s v R [2014] VSCA 342; R v Grossi [2008] VSCA 51; R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Sentence: 9 months imprisonment followed by 2 year CCO ---…
Akkala v The Queen [2012] VSCA 29
Citation 4

…Grossi [2008] VSCA 51; R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Sentence: 9 months imprisonment followed by 2 year CCO ---…
Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156
Citation 5

…Cases Cited: Boulton & Ors v R [2014] VSCA 342; R v Grossi [2008] VSCA 51; R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Sentence: 9 months imprisonment followed by 2 year CCO ---…
R v Grossi [2008] VSCA 51
Citation 6

…Cases Cited: Boulton & Ors v R [2014] VSCA 342; R v Grossi [2008] VSCA 51; R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Sentence: 9 months imprisonment followed by 2 year CCO ---…
R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177
Citation 7

…Cases Cited: Boulton & Ors v R [2014] VSCA 342; R v Grossi [2008] VSCA 51; R v Galletta [2007] VSCA 177; Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156; Melnikas v R [2016] VSCA 112; Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 2; Akkalaa v R [2012] VSCA 29; Sentence: 9 months imprisonment followed by 2 year CCO ---…
DPP v Howard [2018] VCC 967
Citation 8

…moral culpability but where the total stolen had been wholly repaid (and was half the total in the current case - $210,000). Also cited: DPP v Howard [2018] VCC 967. 54Where the amount stolen has been as high as in this case, and where no restitution has been made, I have found no comparable case where a wholly c…

AI Chat coming soon