Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Bandali Michael Debs and Jason Joseph Roberts

Director of Public Prosecutions v Bandali Michael Debs and Jason Joseph Roberts

Case [2002] VSC 225

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Bandali Michael Debs and Jason Joseph Roberts [2002] VSC 225
Case: [2002] VSC 225
Decision Date: 3 June 2002

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Bandali Michael Debs and Jason Joseph Roberts [2002] VSC 225

Most Recent Citation

R v Quist [2017] SASCFC 37

Cases Citing This Decision

R v Quist [2017] SASCFC 37
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…Chronogically: R v Kotzmann (1999) 2 VR 123; R v Landells [2000] VSCA 84; R v Koeleman (2000) 2 VR 20; R v Nguyen (2001) 118 A Crim R 479; DPP v Debs [2002] VSC 225; R v Smith [2002] VSCA 219; R v Cummins (2004) 10 VR 15; R v Murphy [2004] VSCA 23; Withers v The Queen [2009] VSCA 306; Corsi v The Queen [2013] VSC…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Penney v The Queen [1998] HCA 51
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…hranes Road. Further, motive of itself need not be proved beyond reasonable doubt, because it is not an element of murder. The decision in Penney v R (1998) 72 ALJR 1316 causes some difficulty. Although obiter (because Penney was about relationship, not motive) Callinan J (in whose judgment and the other justices agre…
Pfennig v the Queen [1995] HCA 7
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…similar facts has been admitted to prove the identity of the perpetrator: for example Sutton v R (1983-1984) 152 CLR 528 and Pfenning v R (1994-1995) 182 CLR 461). The law was helpfully, if I may say so, summarised by Winneke P. in R v Tektonopoulos (1999) 2 VR 412 at 417, where he said:…
Shepherd v The Queen [1990] HCA 56
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…is identification. Generally, it is not the law that important facts, short of indispensable intermediate facts as steps contemplated by Shepherd v R (1990) 170 CLR 573, need be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Here, the Hamada robberies are not indispensable to the prosecution case. The jury could reject the Hamada e…
R v Murphy [1985] HCA 50
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…biter (because Penney was about relationship, not motive) Callinan J (in whose judgment and the other justices agreed) at 1321 referred to R v Murphy (1985) 4 NSWLR 42 at 59 to 60, in which Callinan J had appeared as counsel, as follows:…
Sutton v The Queen [1984] HCA 5
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…Next, in a number of cases evidence of similar facts has been admitted to prove the identity of the perpetrator: for example Sutton v R (1983-1984) 152 CLR 528 and Pfenning v R (1994-1995) 182 CLR 461). The law was helpfully, if I may say so, summarised by Winneke P. in R v Tektonopoulos (1999) 2 VR 412 at 417…
Markby v The Queen [1978] HCA 29
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…The basal common law principles applicable to such evidence were clearly stated by the Court in Markby v R (1978) 140 CLR 108 at 116 to 117:…
Mutual Life Insurance Co of New York v Moss [1906] HCA 70
Citation 7

…or impelling him to do so, and the more heinous the act, the more important becomes the question of motive" MLC Insurance Company of New York v Moss (1906) 4 CLR 311 at 317.…

AI Chat isn't available for this judgment.