Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Aramia

Director of Public Prosecutions v Aramia

Case [2022] VCC 2254

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Aramia [2022] VCC 2254
Case: [2022] VCC 2254
Decision Date: 17 November 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Aramia [2022] VCC 2254

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169
Citation 1

…rse of justice and your plea carries with it important utilitarian value, heightened also due to Worboyes considerations.[7] [7] Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169…
Smith v The Queen [2020] VSCA 159
Citation 2

…heavy sentences. By this means, sentencing courts express on behalf of the community the strongest denunciation of such abhorrent conduct. [5] [2020] VSCA 159, [7]. 23The prevalence of family violence also makes community protection a significant sentencing consideration and general deterrence of fundamental impo…
Fernandez v EJ Industries Ltd [2020] VSCA 139
Citation 3

…nce – Guarded prospects of rehabilitation Cases Cited: DPP v Meyers [2014] VSCA 31; Pasinis v The Queen [21014] VSCA 139; Smith v The Queen [2020] VSCA 139; Worboyes v The Queen [VSCA] 169. Sentence: Imprisonment for a period of 2 years and 8 months. Non-parole period for 1 year and 11 months.…
DPP v Meyers [2014] VSCA 314
Citation 4

…[8] DPP v Meyers [2014] VSCA 314, [46].…
Pasinis v The Queen [2014] VSCA 97
Citation 5

…y protection a significant sentencing consideration and general deterrence of fundamental importance in your case . [6] [6] Pasinis v The Queen [2014] VSCA 97, [53]. 24In assessing the objective gravity of the aggravated burglary charge, I make the following findings: Your intent at entry was to assault Ms Mullig…
SLS v The Queen [2014] VSCA 31
Citation 6

…ilty – Causing injury intentionally – Aggravated burglary – Family violence – Guarded prospects of rehabilitation Cases Cited: DPP v Meyers [2014] VSCA 31; Pasinis v The Queen [21014] VSCA 139; Smith v The Queen [2020] VSCA 139; Worboyes v The Queen [VSCA] 169. Sentence: Imprisonment for a period of 2 years and 8…

AI Chat coming soon