Director of Public Prosecutions v Abe and Kijima

Case [2020] VCC 1347

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

DPP v Weybury [2018] VSCA 120
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…synthesis.[5] What can be said is that while the offending is serious, in all the circumstances it is not at the high end. [5] DPP v Weybury [2018] VSCA 120 at [54] (Priest JA).…
R v Pham [2015] HCA 39
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…nsistency.[8] To that end, the prosecution and the defence summarised a number of case examples which I have taken into account. [8] The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550 at [47]-[50].…
DPP (Cth) v Maxwell [2013] VSCA 50
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…ortation, is a highly relevant factor in determining the objective seriousness of the offence.[1] [1] Nguyen v The Queen and Phommalysack v The Queen (2011) 31 VR 673 at [34].…
R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…networks can only continue to exist if people like you are willing to take the risk and undertake the task of being a courier.[3] [3] The Queen v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 at [34].…
The Queen v Pham [2015] HCATrans 218
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…ing reasonable consistency.[8] To that end, the prosecution and the defence summarised a number of case examples which I have taken into account. [8] The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550 at [47]-[50].…

AI Chat coming soon