Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Jackson

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Jackson

Case [2018] VCC 2141

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Jackson [2018] VCC 2141
Case: [2018] VCC 2141
Decision Date: 13 December 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Jackson [2018] VCC 2141

Most Recent Citation

Bembo v The King [2023] VSCA 68

Cases Citing This Decision

Bembo v The King [2023] VSCA 68
Citation 1 (Para 3)

…conversation with Mr Mabiala of the kind alleged by him. [19]As to the circumstances leading to Mr Jackson’s incarceration, see DPP (Cth) v Jackson [2018] VCC 2141, and in particular [1]-[5], [79].…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Blango v The Queen [2018] VSCA 210
Citation 1

…ce is said on the chart of comparable cases that was provided to me to indicate that it was 74 times the commercial quantity. [13] Blango v The Queen [2018] VSCA 210 71The fact of multiple consignments, albeit each of smaller quantities increases the objective seriousness of Mr Blango's offending, and he also had…
R v Ocampo Alvarez [2018] QCA 162
Citation 2

…z had also pleaded guilty, although a number of facts were disputed requiring the judge to hear evidence and determine them. [14] Alvarez v The Queen [2018] QCA 162 73In the case of Yuan ,[15] over a period of three to four months the offender had organised importation of a container with 68.8 kilograms of pure m…
Jaafar v R [2017] NSWCCA 223
Citation 3

…be regarded as increasing the seriousness of the offence. That feature does not apply to you, nor for that matter did it to Mr Brown. [12] Jaafar v R [2017] NSWCCA 223 69Again, the quantity in your case makes yours objectively more serious than in Jaafar's case, but the role of that offender was higher and he knew t…
DPP (Cth) v Brown [2017] VSCA 162
Citation 4

…Cases Cited: DPP (Cth) v Thomas and Wu [2016] VSCA 237; Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R [2011] VSCA 32; DPP (Cth) v Brown - [2017] VSCA 162 Sentence: 14 years imprisonment; non-parole period of 9 years. ---…
R v Schelvis [2016] QCA 294
Citation 5

…d, [16] Velez, [17] Peng, [18] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen, [19] Pham and Tang ,[20] as well as Nguyen and Phommalysack .[21] [16] R v Schelvis & Hildebrand [2016] QCA 294; (2016) 263 A Crim R 1 [17] Velez v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177 [18] DPP v Peng [2014] VSCA 128 [19] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119 […
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Vinod Thomas Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Leung Hang Wu [2016] VSCA 237
Citation 6

…Cases Cited: DPP (Cth) v Thomas and Wu [2016] VSCA 237; Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R [2011] VSCA 32; DPP (Cth) v Brown - [2017] VSCA 162 Sentence: 14 years imprisonment; non-parole period of 9 years. ---…
R v Yuan [2015] NSWCCA 198
Citation 7

…a non-parole period of ten years, although the dissenting judge indicated 13 years with a non-parole period of eight and a half. [15] R (Cth) v Yuan [2015] NSWCCA 198; (2015) 252 A Crim R 422 74I have also read and considered relevant passages from the other cases to which the prosecution referred me, or at least a…
Velez v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177
Citation 8

…ham and Tang ,[20] as well as Nguyen and Phommalysack .[21] [16] R v Schelvis & Hildebrand [2016] QCA 294; (2016) 263 A Crim R 1 [17] Velez v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177 [18] DPP v Peng [2014] VSCA 128 [19] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119 [20] Pham v The Queen; Tang v The Queen [2012] VSCA 101 [21] Ng…
DPP (Cth) v Peng [2014] VSCA 128
Citation 9

…en and Phommalysack .[21] [16] R v Schelvis & Hildebrand [2016] QCA 294; (2016) 263 A Crim R 1 [17] Velez v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177 [18] DPP v Peng [2014] VSCA 128 [19] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119 [20] Pham v The Queen; Tang v The Queen [2012] VSCA 101 [21] Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R (2011…
DPP (Cth) v Maxwell [2013] VSCA 50
Citation 10

…A 128 [19] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119 [20] Pham v The Queen; Tang v The Queen [2012] VSCA 101 [21] Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R (2011) 31 VR 673; [2011] VSCA 32 75I have taken all of the cases I have mentioned into account, as relevant guidance, but not setting outer limits on sentencing range…
Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119
Citation 11

…nd [2016] QCA 294; (2016) 263 A Crim R 1 [17] Velez v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177 [18] DPP v Peng [2014] VSCA 128 [19] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119 [20] Pham v The Queen; Tang v The Queen [2012] VSCA 101 [21] Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R (2011) 31 VR 673; [2011] VSCA 32 75I have taken all of the…
Pham v The Queen; Tang v The Queen [2012] VSCA 101
Citation 12

…(Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177 [18] DPP v Peng [2014] VSCA 128 [19] Thi Kim Phung Nguyen v The Queen [2012] VSCA 119 [20] Pham v The Queen; Tang v The Queen [2012] VSCA 101 [21] Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R (2011) 31 VR 673; [2011] VSCA 32 75I have taken all of the cases I have mentioned into account, as relevant guidanc…
Nguyen v The Queen [2011] VSCA 32
Citation 13

…Cases Cited: DPP (Cth) v Thomas and Wu [2016] VSCA 237; Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R [2011] VSCA 32; DPP (Cth) v Brown - [2017] VSCA 162 Sentence: 14 years imprisonment; non-parole period of 9 years. ---…

AI Chat coming soon