DIP17 v Minister for Immigration
[2017] FCCA 2046
•28 August 2017
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| DIP17 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2017] FCCA 2046 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for Constitutional writs in respect of Tribunal’s decision to affirm cancellation of visa – no appearance by the applicant – appropriate matter for Court to exercise powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) – application dismissed. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.13.03C(1)(c) |
| Applicant: | DIP17 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 2348 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 28 August 2017 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 28 August 2017 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 28 August 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by or on behalf of the applicant. |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Ms B Rayment Mills Oakley Lawyers |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth).
The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the amount of $3,606.00.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 2348 of 2017
| DIP17 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.476 of the Migration Act1958 (Cth) (“the Act”) in respect of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) made on 22 June 2017 affirming a decision to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 866 Protection visa.
The application in this Court was filed on 25 July 2017. By order made on 22 August 2017 this matter was listed for directions today. The matter has been called, and the applicant has failed to appear.
The first respondent has read an affidavit by Ms Evans identifying the applicant left the country on 4 August 2017. The first respondent has moved for the application to be dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (“the Rules”). An affidavit has been read that the applicant departed Australia on 4 August 2017.
I am satisfied that the applicant was aware of the hearing date today. I am satisfied that the matter is an appropriate one in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Rules. Accordingly, the application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) the Rules.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Date: 26 October 2017
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
3