Dimokranitis v Exotic Limo Pty Ltd

Case

[2010] ATMO 69

29 July 2010


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Dimokranitis v Exotic Limo Pty Ltd [2010] ATMO 69 [2010] ATMO 69 29 July 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an opposition by Theo Dimokranitis to the registration of trade mark application 1148162 by Exotic Limo Pty Ltd. The opponent, Mr Dimokranitis, operates a car hire business under the name "Exoticar" and is the registered owner of trade mark 1125223 for car hire and car rental services, including those associated with chauffeur-driven vehicles. He alleged use of his trade mark and the plain word "EXOTICAR" since 2002 in connection with his business, which caters to special occasions such as weddings and formals.

The legal issues before the Hearing Officer were whether the grounds of opposition raised by Mr Dimokranitis had been established to the extent that they warranted the refusal of Exotic Limo Pty Ltd's trade mark application. The onus was on the opponent to prove these grounds on the balance of probabilities. The opponent's evidence detailed the history and nature of his car hire business, including the size of his fleet, advertising expenditure, and the establishment of a website to promote his services.

The Hearing Officer found that the opponent had not established his opposition to the registration of application 1148162. Consequently, the application was permitted to proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless a notice of appeal was filed, in which case registration would be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. The Hearing Officer also awarded costs against the opponent, as there was no reason to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property

  • Commercial Law

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Cited

9

Statutory Material Cited

0

Pfizer Products Inc v Karam [2006] FCA 1663