Digital Eagles Pty Ltd (Migration)

[2019] AATA 5214

Digital Eagles Pty Ltd (Migration) [2019] AATA 5214 (21 November 2019)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Digital Eagles Pty Ltd

CASE NUMBER:  1905747

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2019/625168

MEMBER:R. Skaros

DATE:21 November 2019

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to approve the applicant as a standard business sponsor.

Statement made on 21 November 2019 at 10:00am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – application for approval as standard business sponsor – lawfully operating a business – no response to Tribunal’s communication – no appearance by applicant at hearing – last financial information submitted for year ending 30 June 2017 – no current information about business operations – decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1959 (Cth), ss 140E(1), 359(2), 359C, 360(3), 363A

Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 2.59(c), 2.60S, 2.61

CASE

Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 8 March 2019 not to approve the applicant as a standard business sponsor.

2. The applicant applied for approval as a standard business sponsor under s.140E of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) and r.2.61 of the Regulations on 25 February 2019. The delegate decided not to approve the application on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy r.2.59(c) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the delegate was not satisfied that the applicant was lawfully operating a business in or outside of Australia.

3. On 31 October 2019 the Tribunal wrote to the review applicant pursuant to s.359(2) of the Act, inviting the review applicant to provide current information about the various requirements in r.2.59 and r.2.60S for approval as a standard business sponsor in writing.

4. The invitation was sent to the last email address provided in connection with the review and advised that, if the information was not provided in writing by 14 November 2019 the Tribunal may make a decision on the review without taking further steps to obtain the information and the review applicant would lose any entitlement they might otherwise have had under the Act to appear before the Tribunal to give evidence and present arguments.

5. The review applicant has not provided the information within the prescribed period and no extension has been granted. In these circumstances, s.359C applies and pursuant to s.360(3) the review applicant is not entitled to appear before the Tribunal. The effect of s.363A of the Act is that if a review applicant has no entitlement to a hearing, the Tribunal has no power to permit him or her to appear: Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40.

6. The Tribunal is satisfied that the invitation to provide information was sent correctly by email and that no response has been received. The invitation was not returned to sender as undeliverable mail. The Tribunal is satisfied that the invitation was properly sent. To date the requested information has not been provided and the applicant has not made any contact with the Tribunal to indicate that the information is forthcoming. The Tribunal has decided to proceed to decision without taking further steps to obtain the information.

7. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to affirm the decision under review not to approve the applicant as a standard business sponsor.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

8. The issue in this case is whether the applicant meets the requirements for approval as a standard business sponsor in accordance with the criteria in r.2.59 and the additional criteria in r.2.60S, which must be satisfied regardless of when the application for approval was made. For the application to be approved, all the requirements must be met: s.140E(1).

9. As indicated above, the applicant was invited to provide information about the various requirements for approval as a standard business sponsor but has not done so. For the reasons that follow, the Tribunal has found that the requirement in r.2.59(c) is not met.

   Lawfully operating business

10. Regulation2.59(c) requires that the applicant is lawfully operating a business either in or outside Australia.

11. The Tribunal has had regard to the information given by the applicant at the time of applying for review that included an unsigned financial report for the year ending 30 June 2017 and a single business activity statement that showed an amount owing to the ATO of $30,438.00. The Tribunal requested the applicant to provide current information about whether they are lawfully operating a business either inside or outside Australia. Without limiting the type of information that could be provided, the Tribunal suggested examples of information and/or documents that the applicant could provide to show that they are operating a business, such as evidence of their current business registration, recent business activity statements and financial reports. No response has been received to the invitation to provide information.

12. The Tribunal considers that r.2.59(c) requires the applicant to show that they are engaged in ongoing business activities. The applicant has not provided current evidence to the Tribunal which indicates that they are presently engaged in any business activities. In the circumstances, the Tribunal is unable to be satisfied that, at the time of decision, the applicant is operating a business either in or outside Australia.

13. Given the above, the Tribunal finds that the requirement in r.2.59(c) is not met.

14. For the reasons given above, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets the applicable criteria prescribed in the Regulations to be approved as a standard business sponsor. Accordingly, the Tribunal must affirm the decision under review.

    DECISION

15. The Tribunal affirms the decision not to approve the applicant as a standard business sponsor.

    R. Skaros
    Senior Member

    
    

    ATTACHMENT - Extracts from the Migration Regulations 1994

    2.59      Criteria for approval as a standard business sponsor

    For subsection 140E (1) of the Act, the criterion that must be satisfied for the Minister to approve an application by a person (the applicant) for approval as a standard business sponsor is that the Minister is satisfied that:

    (a)the applicant has applied for approval as a standard business sponsor in accordance with the process set out in regulation 2.61; and

    (c)the applicant is lawfully operating a business (whether in or outside Australia); and

    (f)if the applicant is lawfully operating a business in Australia:

    (i)   the applicant has attested, in writing, that the applicant has a strong record of, or a demonstrated commitment to, employing local labour; and

    (ii)  the applicant has declared, in writing, that the applicant will not engage in discriminatory recruitment practices; and

    (g)either:

    (i)       there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the applicant or a person associated with the applicant; or

    (ii)      it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the applicant or a person associated with the applicant; and.

    (h)if the applicant is lawfully operating a business outside Australia and does not lawfully operate a business in Australia – the applicant is seeking to be approved as a standard business sponsor in relation to a holder of a [Subclass 457 visa] or a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa, or an applicant or a proposed applicant (the visa applicant) for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa, and the applicant intends for the visa holder or visa applicant to:

    (i)       establish, or assist in establishing, on behalf of the applicant, a business operation in Australia with overseas connections; or

    (ii)      fulfil, or assist in fulfilling, a contractual obligation of the applicant.

    2.60S Additional criteria for all classes of sponsor — transfer, recovery and payment of costs

    (1)For subsection 140E(1) of the Act, the criteria in this regulation are in addition to the criteria in regulations 2.59 to 2.60M.

    (2)The criteria that must be satisfied for the Minister to approve an application by a person (the applicant) for approval as a sponsor mentioned in any of regulations 2.59 to 2.60M include a criterion that the Minister is satisfied that:

    (a)the applicant has not taken any action, and has not sought to take any action, that would result in the transfer to another person of some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs, associated with the applicant becoming an approved sponsor; and

    (b)the applicant has not taken any action, and has not sought to take any action, that would result in another person paying to a person some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs, associated with the applicant becoming an approved sponsor; and

    (ba)the applicant has not taken any action, and has not sought to take any action, that would result in the transfer to another person of some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs, associated with a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act (including a fee mentioned in subregulation 2.73(5) or (7) or 2.73A(3)); and

    (bb)the applicant has not taken any action, and has not sought to take any action, that would result in another person paying to a person some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs, associated with a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act (including a fee mentioned in subregulation 2.73(5) or (7) or 2.73A(3)); and

    (c)the applicant has not taken any action, and has not sought to take any action, that would result in the transfer to another person of some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs, that relate specifically to the recruitment of a non-citizen for the purposes of a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act; and

    (d)the applicant has not taken any action, and has not sought to take any action, that would result in another person paying to a person some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs, that relate specifically to the recruitment of a non-citizen for the purposes of a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act; and

    (e)…

    (f)....

    (3)The criteria that must be satisfied for the Minister to approve an application by a person (the applicant) for approval as a sponsor mentioned in any of regulations 2.59 to 2.60M include a criterion that the Minister is satisfied that:

    (a)the applicant has not recovered from another person some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs:

    (i)       associated with the person becoming an approved sponsor; or

    (ia)     associated with a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act (including a fee mentioned in subregulation 2.73(5) or (7) or 2.73A(3)); or

    (ii)      that relate specifically to the recruitment of a non-citizen for the purposes of a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act; and

    (b)the applicant has not sought to recover from another person some or all of the costs, including migration agent costs:

    (i)       associated with the person becoming an approved sponsor; or

    (ia)     associated with a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act (including a fee mentioned in subregulation 2.73(5) or (7) or 2.73A(3)); or

    (ii)      that relate specifically to the recruitment of a non-citizen for the purposes of a nomination under subsection 140GB(1) of the Act; and

    (c)…

    (d)…

    (4)However, the Minister may disregard a criterion referred to in subregulation (2) or (3) if the Minister considers it reasonable to do so.