JURISDICTION : STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
ACT: STRATA TITLES ACT 1985 (WA)
CITATION: DICKINSON and CHARUGA [2021] WASAT 122
MEMBER: MS N OWEN-CONWAY, MEMBER
HEARD: DETERMINED ON THE DOCUMENTS
DELIVERED : 13 SEPTEMBER 2021
PUBLISHED : 13 SEPTEMBER 2021
FILE NO/S: CC 896 of 2020
BETWEEN: MARK ANDREW DICKINSON
Applicant
AND
IVAN CHARUGA
First Respondent
GAIL CHARUGA
Second Respondent
THE OWNERS OF NO'S 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 VISTA CLOSE STRATA PLAN 7772
Third Respondent
Catchwords:
Costs of withdrawn Strata TitlesAct 1985 (WA) application - Section 87(2) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act2004 (WA) - Discretion to be exercised pursuant to s 87(2) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act2004 (WA) - Nature and quantum of claimed costs - Section 87(3) of the Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA)
Legislation:
State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), s 82(7), s 87
Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA) (post 1 May 2020), s 14, s 35, s 35(2), s 209
Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA) (prior to 1 May 2020), s 1(7), s 15, s 32
Result:
Application for costs dismissed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
| Applicant | : | N/A |
| First Respondent | : | N/A |
| Second Respondent | : | N/A |
| Third Respondent | : | N/A |
Solicitors:
| Applicant | : | N/A |
| First Respondent | : | N/A |
| Second Respondent | : | N/A |
| Third Respondent | : | N/A |
Case(s) referred to in decision(s):
Chew and Director General of the Department of Education and Training [2006] WASAT 248
Pearce & Anor and Germain [2007] WASAT 291(S)
Springmist Pty Ltd and Shire of Augusta-Margaret River [2005] WASAT 143(S)
Western Australia Planning Commission v Questdale Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] WASCA 32
REASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL:
The application for costs
The first respondent's claim for costs comprises the following components:
1)loss of wages totalling $9,551.52 for 16 days as follows:
a)four days for 'Directional Hearings';
b)three days for 'No. 1 Submission';
c)six days for 'Preparation for Hearing'; and
d)three days for 'Preparation for Costs';
calculated at the rate of $596.95 per 'weekday';
2)punitive damages of $40,000 for 'embarrassment and significant emotional and physical toll this has placed upon us' and 'economic loss and suffering'; and
3)an unspecified amount by way of punitive damages for loss of enjoyment of life and loss of reputation to be assessed by the Tribunal.
The second respondent's claim for costs comprises the following components:
1)loss of wages totalling $4,800 for 16 days as follows:
a)four days for 'Directional Hearings';
b)three days for 'No. 1 Submission';
c)six days for 'Preparation for Hearing';
d)three days for 'Preparation for Costs';
calculated at $300 per 'weekday';
2)punitive damages of $40,000 for 'embarrassment and significant emotional and physical toll this process has taken'; and
3)an unspecified amount by way of punitive damages 'to cover the impact on my health that this whole process has caused' to be assessed by the Tribunal.
Jointly the first and second respondents' claim for costs comprises the following components:
a)laptop computer - $465.29;
b)printer and drivers - $105;
c)Microsoft Office - $159;
d)stationery - $25; and
e)travel expenses 'to…
Continue reading DICKINSON and CHARUGA
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- DICKINSON and CHARUGA [2021] WASAT 122
- Case
- [2021] WASAT 122
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.