Dickens & Dickens (No 3)

Case [2016] FamCA 771


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

DICKENS & DICKENS (NO 3) [2016] FamCA 771
FAMILY LAW – INTERIM
APPLICANT: Mr Dickens
RESPONDENT: Ms Dickens
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Mr Moylan
FILE NUMBER: SYC 739 of 2010
DATE DELIVERED: 5 September 2016
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Watts J
HEARING DATE: 5 September 2016

REPRESENTATION

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Father in person
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mother in person
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Moylan Family Law

Orders

  1. The Application in a Case filed by the father on 9 May 2016 be dismissed.

  2. Liberty granted to the Independent Children's Lawyer to relist the matter before me on 7 days’ notice should he need any further direction in relation to the preparation of the expert report.

  3. The listing of any further application filed in these proceedings be referred to my chambers for the consideration of a listing before myself if I am reasonably available.

  4. Today’s costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer be reserved.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Dickens & Dickens (No 3) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYC 739  of 2010

Mr Dickens

Applicant

And

Ms Dickens

Respondent

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 9 May, the father filed an application in a case.  It was initially listed in July but then referred to me for consideration given that this matter is in my docket for the completion of a final hearing.  The application seeks the following orders:

    (1)That orders 1 and 2 made on 20 May 2015 by Watts J be made redundant;

    (2)That orders 1, 2 and 3 made on 1 March 2016 by Watts J be made redundant;

    (3)Dr U be excluded from having any involvement in this case;

    (4)The family consultant, Ms HH, be appointed to prepare a family report;

    (5)that the independent children’s lawyer, Mr Paddy Moylan, be discharged from this case;

    (6)that the matter proceed and be finalised without an independent children’s lawyer;

    (7)that this application be listed at short notice;

    (8)that reasons for judgment be provided.

  2. The father, in support of that application, filed an affidavit on 9 May 2016. Rule 5.09(a) of the Family Law Rules provides that, in any interim or procedural application, the parties are allowed to file one affidavit. Rule 15.12 provides that any document to be used in connection with the proceedings should be attached to the affidavit up to a certain thickness and, if it cannot be attached, the material is to…

Continue reading Dickens & Dickens (No 3)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Dickens & Dickens (No 3) [2016] FamCA 771
Case
[2016] FamCA 771
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Dickens & Dickens (No 3)*, Watts J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application filed by the father concerning proceedings involving his children. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the father's application, is not detailed in the provided text.

The primary legal issue before the court was the disposition of the father's application. Additionally, the court was required to consider whether further directions were necessary for the preparation of an expert report, and how any future applications in the proceedings should be listed. The court also had to determine the costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer for the day.

Watts J dismissed the father's application. Liberty was granted to the Independent Children's Lawyer to relist the matter for further directions regarding the expert report, provided seven days' notice was given. Any future applications were to be referred to the judge's chambers for consideration of listing before Watts J, if he was reasonably available. The costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer for the day were reserved.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Application in a Case filed by the father on 9 May 2016 be dismissed.

2.

Liberty granted to the Independent Children's Lawyer to relist the matter before me on 7 days’ notice should he need any further direction in relation to the preparation of the expert report.

3.

The listing of any further application filed in these proceedings be referred to my chambers for the consideration of a listing before myself if I am reasonably available.

4.

Today’s costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer be reserved.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.