FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| DICKENS & DICKENS (NO. 2) | [2017] FamCA 750 |
| FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – SUBPOENA – Review of Registrar’s decision not to reissue a subpoena to the NSW Police – Where the NSW police have produced certain documents – Where the father does not accept the explanation given by the NSW Police that they are unable to locate or no longer have further documents – Where there is little utility in reissuing the subpoena to the NSW police – Where the issue to which any documents that may not have been produced is peripheral to any central issue in the competing applications for parenting orders – Where the father’s application is dismissed. |
| State Records Act 1998 (NSW) |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Dickens |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Dickens |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Mr Moylan |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 739 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 25 September 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Watts J |
| HEARING DATE: | 15 August 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Father in person |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mother in person |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Moylan Family Law |
Orders
(Made 15 August 2017)
At the request of the father, both his Application in a Case filed 29 October 2015 and his Application in a Case filed 30 March 2016 be dismissed.
The father’s Application in a Case filed 9 March 2016 be dismissed. I reserve my reasons for judgment.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Dickens & Dickens (No. 2) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 739 of 2010
| Mr Dickens |
Applicant
And
| Ms Dickens |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
By way of an Application in a Case filed 9 March 2016 the father sought to review a decision of Registrar Campbell regarding a subpoena issued by the father dated 10 December 2015.
The formal orders that the father sought were as follows:
1. That the decision made on 29 February 2016 by Registrar Campbell regarding subpoena dated 10 December 2015 be set aside.
2. That Police produce for inspection the original items listed in item 3 of the schedule to subpoena dated 10 December 2015.
3. That Police produce copies of the items listed in item 3 of the schedule to subpoena dated 10 December 2015.
…
The father has issued a number of subpoenas to the NSW Police Force in this matter. The police have produced certain documents pursuant to those subpoenas. The father complains that they have not produced…
Continue reading Dickens and Dickens (No. 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Dickens and Dickens (No. 2) [2017] FamCA 750
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 750
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to dismiss the father's applications filed on 29 October 2015, 30 March 2016, and 9 March 2016. The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action regarding these applications, which were brought at the father's request.
Watts J ordered the dismissal of all three of the father's applications. The reasons for judgment were reserved, indicating that the court's detailed legal reasoning and the principles applied in reaching this outcome would be provided separately.
Orders
Orders of the court
(Made 15 August 2017)
1.
At the request of the father, both his Application in a Case filed 29 October 2015 and his Application in a Case filed 30 March 2016 be dismissed.
2.
The father’s Application in a Case filed 9 March 2016 be dismissed. I reserve my reasons for judgment.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.