Diageo Brands B.V. v Australian Vintage Limited
Case
•
[2024] ATMO 142
•5 August 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Diageo Brands B.V. v Australian Vintage Limited [2024] ATMO 142
[2024] ATMO 142
5 August 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Diageo Brands B.V. opposed the registration of the trade mark application 2226227, for the mark BLACK LABEL (Fancy), by Australian Vintage Limited. The decision was made by Nicholas Smith, a Hearing Officer acting as Delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was whether the opposition to the registration of the BLACK LABEL trade mark should succeed, specifically concerning the ground of opposition pursuant to section 60 of the relevant legislation.
The Hearing Officer found that the Opponent, Diageo Brands B.V., had successfully established the ground of opposition under section 60. Consequently, the Hearing Officer refused to register the trade mark application. The refusal was to be recorded one month from the date of the decision, unless a notice of appeal was filed, in which case the refusal would be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. The Hearing Officer also awarded costs in favour of the Opponent against the Applicant, Australian Vintage Limited, in accordance with the general rule that costs follow the event.
The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was whether the opposition to the registration of the BLACK LABEL trade mark should succeed, specifically concerning the ground of opposition pursuant to section 60 of the relevant legislation.
The Hearing Officer found that the Opponent, Diageo Brands B.V., had successfully established the ground of opposition under section 60. Consequently, the Hearing Officer refused to register the trade mark application. The refusal was to be recorded one month from the date of the decision, unless a notice of appeal was filed, in which case the refusal would be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. The Hearing Officer also awarded costs in favour of the Opponent against the Applicant, Australian Vintage Limited, in accordance with the general rule that costs follow the event.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
4
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020