Diabetes Australia - Victoria

Case

[2014] FWCA 6261

9 SEPTEMBER 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWCA 6261
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Diabetes Australia - Victoria
(AG2014/8720)

DIABETES AUSTRALIA - VICTORIA AND MEDICAL SCIENTISTS ASSOCIATION OF VICTORIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Health and welfare services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON

MELBOURNE, 9 SEPTEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the Diabetes Australia - Victoria and Medical Scientists Association of Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Diabetes Australia - Victoria and Medical Scientists Association of Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Diabetes Australia - Victoria. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I have accepted the undertakings attached to this decision which have been given by the employer.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The agreement does not contain a model flexibility term compliant with the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.

[6] The Medical Scientists Association of Victoria being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE410012  PR555250>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0