Legal Research
Cases
Di Petro v International Airline Services Pty Ltd (Ruling)

Di Petro v International Airline Services Pty Ltd (Ruling)

Case [2011] VCC 499

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Di Petro v International Airline Services Pty Ltd (Ruling) [2011] VCC 499
Case: [2011] VCC 499
Decision Date: 12 April 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Di Petro v International Airline Services Pty Ltd (Ruling) [2011] VCC 499

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd [2005] HCA 15
Citation 1

…initially relied on an allegation of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff but such allegation was withdrawn during the trial. [1] See Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd (2005) 222 CLR 44; Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317 3 The plaintiff gave evidence that during the c…
Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Limited [2004] WADC 64
Citation 2

…of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff but such allegation was withdrawn during the trial. [1] See Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd (2005) 222 CLR 44; Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317 3 The plaintiff gave evidence that during the course of hi…
Tame v New South Wales [2002] HCA 35
Citation 3

…during the trial. [1] See Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd (2005) 222 CLR 44; Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317 3 The plaintiff gave evidence that during the course of his employment, he was generally harassed and bullied by a leading hand/supervisor, Ms Gail J…
Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd [2000] WASCA 357
Citation 4

…iff but such allegation was withdrawn during the trial. [1] See Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd (2005) 222 CLR 44; Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317 3 The plaintiff gave evidence that during the course of his employment, he was generally harassed and bullied by a leading hand/superviso…

AI Chat coming soon