| [2017] FWCA 2334 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
DGL (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2017/873)
DGL (AUST) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (STRAMIT ERSKINE PARK SITE 2017 – 2020)
Road transport industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 28 APRIL 2017 |
Application for approval of the DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Stramit Erskine Park site) 2017-2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Stramit Erskine Park site) 2017-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by DGL (Australia) Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 28 April 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 5 May 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 February 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE424162 PR592470>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- DGL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 2334
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 2334
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the FWC were whether the enterprise agreement complied with the relevant statutory provisions and whether it met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This included assessing whether the agreement provided for minimum entitlements, was fairly negotiated, and was free from any illegality or unfairness. Additionally, the FWC needed to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being a single, integrated agreement.
The FWC reviewed the negotiation process and the contents of the agreement to ensure compliance with the statutory framework. The Commission found that the agreement provided for minimum entitlements and was fairly negotiated. The FWC also confirmed that there were no illegalities or unfairness in the agreement. Given these findings, the FWC approved the enterprise agreement, determining that it met the necessary criteria for a single, integrated agreement and was in the best interests of the employees. The approval was granted, and the enterprise agreement was registered accordingly.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.