DG
v
THE KING
[2024] HCASL 148
S33/2024
The applicant applies for an extension of time in which to seek special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales (Wilson, Fagan and Sweeney JJ), dismissing an appeal from a decision of the District Court of New South Wales (Judge O'Rourke SC).
The proposed appeal has insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
Beech-Jones J
9 May 2024
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read DG v The King and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 148
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application for special leave to appeal should be granted, and in particular whether it had sufficient prospects of success. The court held that the applicant's appeal had insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave, and that an extension of time would be futile. The court also noted that the proposed appeal was not a significant matter of public importance, and that the applicant had not identified any error in the Court of Criminal Appeal's reasoning that would warrant a grant of special leave.
The court noted that the Court of Criminal Appeal had thoroughly considered the applicant's case, and had found that the appeal had no reasonable prospects of success. The court held that the applicant's appeal was not a significant matter of public importance, and that the applicant had not identified any error in the Court of Criminal Appeal's reasoning that would warrant a grant of special leave. The court also noted that the applicant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances that would warrant an extension of time. The court held that it would be futile to grant an extension of time, and that the application for special leave to appeal should be refused.
In light of the above, the court refused the applicant's application for special leave to appeal, and dismissed the application. No extension of time was granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.