Deyncourt Pty Ltd v Scott Mitchell Passmore as Trustee for the S R G Passmore Investment Trust
Case
•
[2019] ATMO 26
•25 February 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Deyncourt Pty Ltd v Scott Mitchell Passmore as Trustee for the S R G Passmore Investment Trust [2019] ATMO 26
[2019] ATMO 26
25 February 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Deyncourt Pty Ltd, sought to register a trade mark, while the respondent, Scott Mitchell Passmore as Trustee for the S R G Passmore Investment Trust, opposed the application. The decision was made by Iain Campbell Thompson.
The central issue before the court was whether any of the grounds of opposition raised by the respondent had been established, which would necessitate the refusal of the trade mark application.
The court determined that the opponent had not established any ground of opposition. Consequently, pursuant to section 55 of the relevant Act, the Registrar was directed to register the trade mark. The court further ordered that registration would proceed one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed, in which case registration would be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal.
The central issue before the court was whether any of the grounds of opposition raised by the respondent had been established, which would necessitate the refusal of the trade mark application.
The court determined that the opponent had not established any ground of opposition. Consequently, pursuant to section 55 of the relevant Act, the Registrar was directed to register the trade mark. The court further ordered that registration would proceed one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed, in which case registration would be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Kevin Murphy Asia Pte Ltd v Lab Brands Limited
[2018] ATMO 58