Devassy (Migration)
[2018] AATA 5107
•4 September 2018
Devassy (Migration) [2018] AATA 5107 (4 September 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Leons Devassy
CASE NUMBER: 1732595
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/3033447
MEMBER:Mara Moustafine
DATE:4 September 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Statement made on 04 September 2018 at 5:40pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) visa – evidence of
English language ability provided – applicant complies with the relevant English language proficiency requirements – Decision under review remitted for reconsideration
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 360
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cls 500.211, 500.213, 500.218
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection on 7 December 2017 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 23 August 2017. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because he had not provided evidence of a level of English language proficiency that met the specified requirements.
The Tribunal did not invite the review applicant to attend a hearing as it decided it should make a favourable decision on the available evidence (s.360(2)).
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets the criterion in cl.500.213.
To meet cl.500.213, the applicant must (if required by the Minister) give evidence that they have a level of English language proficiency that meets the requirements specified in an instrument: cl.500.213(1). This requirement does not apply to an applicant within a class specified in an instrument: cl.500.213(2). IMMI 16/019, which is attached to this decision, specifies the requirements for evidence of English language proficiency and classes of applicants to whom the requirement does not apply.
As the holder of a passport of India, the applicant is not within a class of applicants specified in the instrument. Therefore, cl.500.213(1) applies to the applicant.
In this case, the applicant was required by the Minister to provide evidence of English language proficiency in accordance with the instrument.
The applicant has provided to the Tribunal the results of an IELTS test taken on 15 January 2018 with an Overall Band Score of 5.5.
Accordingly, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.213.
Given the above findings, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Mara Moustafine
MemberAttachment – IMMI 16/019 – English language instrument (extract)
(1)SPECIFY for the purposes of paragraph 500.213(3)(a) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations:
a.the requirement to use one or more of the English language test providers listed in Schedule 1 to this Instrument; and
b.the requirement to achieve the relevant English language test score listed in Schedule 2 to this Instrument in a test provided by the relevant English language test provider mentioned in item 1 of this Instrument; and
c.countries, listed in Schedule 3 to this Instrument, where an applicant may take a Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) paper-based test; and
d.the maximum time periods in which an English test must be taken:
i.two years immediately before the date the application is made; or
ii.two years immediately before a decision is made on the application.
2.SPECIFY for the purposes of paragraph 500.213(3)(b) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, classes of applicants to which subclause 500.213(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations does not apply, as stated in subclause 500.213(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations:
a.an applicant who is a citizen of, and holds a valid passport issued by:
i.the United Kingdom;
ii.the United States of America;
iii.Canada;
iv.New Zealand; or
v.the Republic of Ireland; or
b.an applicant who is enrolled in a principal course of study and that principal course of study is:
i.registered to be delivered in a language other than English;
ii.a registered ELICOS course, as defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations;
iii.a registered school course; or
iv.a registered post-graduate research course; or
c.an applicants who is a:
i.Foreign Affairs student;
ii.Defence Student; or
iii.secondary exchange students; or
d.in the two years before applying for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa, an applicant has successfully completed:
i.the requirements for a Senior Secondary Certificate of Education, in a course that was conducted in Australia in English; or
ii.a substantial component of a course leading to a qualification from the Australian Qualifications Framework at the Certificate IV level or higher that was conducted in Australia in English while the applicant was holding a Student visa; or
e.an applicant who has successfully completed a minimum of 5 years of study in English undertaken in one or more of the following countries:
i.Australia;
ii.Canada;
iii.New Zealand;
iv.South Africa;
v.the Republic of Ireland;
vi.the United Kingdom; and/or
vii.the United States of America.
SCHEDULE 1
English language test providers:
1.
International English Language Testing System (IELTS test)
2.
Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) Paper-Based test
3.
TOEFL internet-based test (also known as TOEFL iBT)
4.
Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) test (also known as Certificate in Advanced English)
5.
Pearson Test of English Academic (PTE)
6.
Occupational English Test (OET)
SCHEDULE 2
English test:
Minimum test score:
1
IELTS
Overall band score 5.5; or
Overall band score 5 if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
Overall band score of 4.5 if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.2
TOEFL
Paper-Based test527; or
500, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
450, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.3
TOEFL iBT
46; or
35, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
32, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.4
CAE
162; or
154, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
147, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.2
PTE
42; or
36, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
30, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.5
OET
‘PASS’ mark
SCHEDULE 3
Countries in which an applicant may take a TOEFL paper-based test:
Belarus
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Ecuador
Mali
Tanzania
El Salvador
Moldova
Uganda
Guatemala
Solomon Islands
Uzbekistan
Honduras
Suriname
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
0
0
0