Deu17; v; Minister for Home Affairs

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DEU17

v

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR

S191/2019
[2019] HCASL 286

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Murphy J). The proposed grounds of appeal have insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. Accordingly, special leave to appeal should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

V.M Bell
11 September 2019
S.J Gageler
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Deu17; v; Minister for Home Affairs and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 286
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, DEU17, filed an application seeking special leave to appeal a decision made by the Federal Court of Australia, presided over by Justice Murphy. The applicant's primary contention is that the Federal Court's decision should be overturned on the grounds that it was made in error. The matter before the High Court was to determine whether the proposed grounds of appeal had sufficient merit to warrant the grant of special leave.

The High Court considered the proposed grounds of appeal and concluded that they did not have sufficient prospects of success. The Court found that the applicant's arguments did not present a substantial question of law of general public importance, nor did they demonstrate any error in the legal reasoning or application of the law by the Federal Court. The High Court held that the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal were not likely to succeed and, therefore, did not warrant the grant of special leave.

In light of the findings, the High Court ruled that special leave to appeal should be refused. The Court ordered that the Registrar should prepare, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application, in accordance with rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The decision was handed down on 11 September 2019, with the order signed by S.J Gageler. The application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and the Federal Court's decision remained in place.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.