DEU17
v
MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
S191/2019
[2019] HCASL 286
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Murphy J). The proposed grounds of appeal have insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. Accordingly, special leave to appeal should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M Bell
11 September 2019S.J Gageler
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Deu17; v; Minister for Home Affairs and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 286
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court considered the proposed grounds of appeal and concluded that they did not have sufficient prospects of success. The Court found that the applicant's arguments did not present a substantial question of law of general public importance, nor did they demonstrate any error in the legal reasoning or application of the law by the Federal Court. The High Court held that the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal were not likely to succeed and, therefore, did not warrant the grant of special leave.
In light of the findings, the High Court ruled that special leave to appeal should be refused. The Court ordered that the Registrar should prepare, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application, in accordance with rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The decision was handed down on 11 September 2019, with the order signed by S.J Gageler. The application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and the Federal Court's decision remained in place.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.