FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| DESMOND & ALLCARD AND ORS | [2012] FamCA 813 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Best interests of the child – where the mother sought sole parental responsibility that the child live with and child spends time with the paternal aunt – where the father sought orders that the child live with him after six weeks with the paternal aunt and that the child have no contact with the mother for an initial period of three months - where orders provide for the child to live with the mother – where orders provide that the child spends time with the paternal aunt – where the child spends no time with the father or paternal grandmother - where the father was convicted of indecently assaulting the child’s step-sister - where the father had served a minimum gaol term of 18 months for his custodial sentence of three years – where the child was found to be at risk in both households - where the expert only marginally favoured the proposal of the mother over the father – where the child was at risk in the mother’s household as she was not emotionally available for the child, as she had not properly dealt with the sexual abuse of her daughter – where the expert said it was necessary for the mother to seek specialist therapeutic intervention from a sexual assault worker as her previous psychological interventions were inadequate in addressing specific issues associated with sexual abuse - where the child was at risk of becoming alienated in his local community if he was to be placed into the home of his father - where the child did not want to have anything to do with his father and where he was protective of his step-sister and mother – where the child’s wishes were given significant weight - where orders were made to allow the child to have the choice of whether to make contact with his father before reaching 18 years of age- where there was a benefit to the child of continuing his relationship with the paternal aunt - where there were previous final consent orders providing for a relationship to be re-established between the father and child, those orders providing that the child first see the paternal grandmother and paternal aunt – where the mother failed to abide by earlier orders providing for contact with the father and paternal family– where the mother did not want the child having any contact with the paternal grandmother – where the expert considered mother’s parenting style somewhat lax with her daughter in early adolescence. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60CC, 62B and 65DA, |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Desmond |
| FIRST RESPONDENT: | Mr Allcard |
| SECOND RESPONDENT: | Ms M Allcard |
| THIRD RESPONDENT: | Ms D Allcard |
| FILE NUMBER: | (P)NCC | 793 | of | 2008 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 21 September 2012 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Newcastle |
| PLACE HEARD: | Newcastle |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Cleary J |
| HEARING DATES: | 29, 30 & 31 August 2012 |
REPRESENTATION
| APPLICANT: | In person |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE FIRST, SECOND &… |
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Desmond and Allcard and Ors and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] FamCA 813
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders that would best serve the child's welfare and best interests. This included establishing who would have sole parental responsibility, where the child would live, and the nature and frequency of contact with extended family members, particularly the father and paternal grandmother. The court also considered provisions for the child's education and the communication of school reports to the father.
Cleary J applied the paramount consideration of the child's best interests under the *Family Law Act 1975*. The reasoning led to orders granting the mother sole parental responsibility and the child living with her. Specific arrangements were made for the child to spend time with his aunt, with provisions for consultation between the mother and aunt regarding contact with the father and paternal grandmother, contingent on the child's wishes. The court also made orders concerning the child's schooling and the provision of school reports to the father, and directed the Independent Children's Lawyer to explain these orders to the child.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the mother shall have sole parental responsibility for the child B born 17 January 2001 (“the child”).
2.
That the child shall live with the mother.
3.
That the child shall spend time with his aunt Ms M Allcard at times and dates agreed between the mother and the aunt and failing agreement otherwise not less than:
3.1 each third Sunday of the calendar month from 12.00 noon Sunday for a period of five hours extending on four of those occasions from 10.00 am Saturday until 5.00 pm Sunday, the first such period to commence in October 2012.
4.
In the event that the child expresses a wish to his mother or paternal aunt to contact and/or spend time with and/or communicate with his father and/or his paternal grandmother then the mother and paternal aunt shall consult with each other and shall arrange for the child to communicate and/or spend time in accordance with his wishes.
5.
The mother is restrained from enrolling the child in any school other than T Primary School until the child completes his primary school education.
6.
This order operates as an authority to any school in which the child is enrolled to provide to the father at his written request and at his expense, if any, a copy of each of the child’s school reports.
7.
The mother shall arrange for the child to meet with the Independent Children’s Lawyer at a mutually convenient time for the Independent Children’s Lawyer to take the following steps:
7.1 to generally explain these orders to the child;
7.2 to explain to the child that if at any time before the age of 18 years the child decides that he wants to contact/spend time with his father and/or his paternal grandmother, then that can happen by arrangement with his paternal aunt in consultation with his mother NOTING that it is entirely up to the decision of the child himself whether such meeting or communication takes place.
8.
Pursuant to s 65DA(2) and s 62B of the Family Law Act 1975, the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders and details of who can assist parties adjust to and comply with an order are set out in the Fact Sheet attached hereto and these particulars are included in these orders.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.