Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Design Studio 407 Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2022] NSWLEC 1351 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 30 June 2022 Date of orders: 07 July 2022 Decision date: 07 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld
(2) Modification Application MOD2021/0170 is approved and Development Consent No. DA2018/0230, which approved the extension of a concrete pool deck, the extension of an existing patio and the construction of a series of timber decks in the rear yard of Lot 2 DP 507491, known as 64 Moons Avenue, Lugarno is modified in the terms in Annexure A.
(3) As a consequence of Order (2) above, Development Consent No. DA2018/0230 as modified by the Court is Annexure B.
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION- conditions of consent required design changes – amended plans – agreement between the parties – orders.
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.55, 8.9, 8.10
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 121B
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, sch 6 cl 3
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34AA, 34Cases Cited: Category: Principal judgment Parties: Design Studio 407 Pty Limited (Applicant)
Georges River Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Driscoll, Solicitor (Applicant)
J Hewitt, Solicitor (Respondent)
BCP Lawyers & Consultants (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/92245 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This appeal relates to the Applicant’s modification application MOD2021/0170 (the modification application) for the modification of development consent DA2018/0230 granted by Georges River Council on 2 April 2019 (the consent). The consent approved the extension of a concrete pool deck, the extension of an existing patio and the construction of a series of timber decks in the rear yard of Lot 2 DP 507491, known as 64 Moons Avenue, Lugarno.
-
The consent required the Applicant to make a number of design changes through the imposition of a condition of consent. The modification application seeks to remove this condition as well as the approved timber decks in the rear yard and replace these elements with fill, grass and retaining walls.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference between the parties, pursuant to ss 34AA(2)(a) and 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). The conciliation conference took place on 30 June 2021. I presided over the conciliation conference.
-
Prior to the conciliation process, the modification application was amended with the agreement of the Council in accordance with cl 121B(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (EPA Regulation). The EPA Regulation was repealed by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (2021 Regulation) on 1 March 2022. However, the EPA Regulation continues to apply instead of the 2021 Regulation to a modification application made, but not finally determined, before that date: 2021 Regulation, Sch 6 cl 3. The modification application was made before, but had not been finally determined by, 1 March 2022. The…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Design Studio 407 Pty Ltd v Georges River Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] NSWLEC 1351
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed modifications to the property, which included the extension of a concrete pool deck, the extension of an existing patio, and the construction of a series of timber decks, complied with the relevant planning controls and the statutory guidelines set forth by the Georges River Council. Specifically, the Court needed to determine whether the modifications were consistent with the established zoning and development controls, as well as any applicable environmental and heritage considerations.
In its reasoning, the Court found that the proposed modifications were in accordance with the relevant planning instruments and did not contravene any statutory guidelines. The Court emphasised that the modifications were consistent with the existing use and character of the property, and did not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. Consequently, the Court decided to uphold the appeal and approved the modification application. As a result, the original development consent, which had been issued under reference DA2018/0230, is modified in accordance with the terms outlined in Annexure A to the judgment. This modified development consent is set out in Annexure B to the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld
(2) Modification Application MOD2021/0170 is approved and Development Consent No. DA2018/0230, which approved the extension of a concrete pool deck, the extension of an existing patio and the construction of a series of timber decks in the rear yard of Lot 2 DP 507491, known as 64 Moons Avenue, Lugarno is modified in the terms in Annexure A.
(3) As a consequence of Order (2) above, Development Consent No. DA2018/0230 as modified by the Court is Annexure B.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.