Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski (No 4)

Case [2020] FCA 446


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski (No 4) [2020] FCA 446

File number: NSD 1399 of 2017
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2020
Legislation:

Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (NSW)

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 39.20

Cases cited:

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski [2018] FCA 616

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski (No 3) [2019] FCA 443

Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Taxation
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Solicitor for the Applicant: Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers Pty Ltd
Solicitor for the Respondent: The application was made ex parte

ORDERS

NSD 1399 of 2017
BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Applicant

AND:

THOMAS ZIOLKOWSKI

Respondent

JUDGE:

GRIFFITHS J

DATE OF ORDER:

3 APRIL 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to r 39.20 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) the period that the Writ for Levy of Property issued against the respondent on 1 April 2019 (as amended) has effect be renewed until 1 April 2021.

2.There be no order as to costs. 

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

GRIFFITHS J:

  1. On 1 April 2019, the Court ordered that a Writ for Levy of Property be issued against the respondent in these proceedings (see Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski (No 3) [2019] FCA 443). On 30 May 2019, the orders were amended.

  2. The applicant now requests an enforcement order in respect of the judgment which was entered against the respondent on 2 May 2018 (Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski [2018] FCA 616). In support of that application, it relies upon an affidavit dated 26 March 2020 by its instructing solicitor, Khaled Metlej. The applicant seeks an order, pursuant to r 39.20 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), that the period that the Writ for Levy of Property issued against the respondent on 1 April 2019 (as amended) has effect be renewed until 1 April 2021.

  3. Relying on Mr Metlej’s affidavit, it is evident that there has been considerable correspondence between the applicant’s solicitors and the Sheriff between the period 16 May 2019 and 4 February 2020 concerning execution of the Writ for the Levy of Property at the relevant address.  Some delay has been occasioned by the passage of the Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (NSW). The evidence also discloses that the subject property is currently vacant and that there may be a possibility that Mr Ziolkowski may be intending to put the property on the market.

  4. I am satisfied that the order sought by the applicant should be made. 

I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Griffiths.

Associate:

Dated:       3 April 2020

Details
AGLC
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ziolkowski (No 4) [2020] FCA 446
Case
[2020] FCA 446
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court of Australia heard a case between the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation and Mr. Piotr Ziolkowski. The central issue in the dispute was the renewal of a writ for the levy of property, issued against Mr. Ziolkowski on 1 April 2019, and the subsequent renewal of this writ. The writ was issued as a result of unpaid taxes and was amended during the course of the proceedings. The Court was tasked with determining whether the writ should be renewed until 1 April 2021, as requested by the Deputy Commissioner.

The primary legal issue the Court had to decide was whether the writ for the levy of property should be renewed for a further two-year period. The Court was required to consider the relevant statutory provisions, including section 179A of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), which governs the issuance and renewal of writs for the levy of property. Additionally, the Court had to consider the procedural requirements set out in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) and the Federal Court Rules 2011. The Court also needed to assess the merits of Mr. Ziolkowski's arguments, if any, against the renewal of the writ.

The Court determined that the writ for the levy of property should indeed be renewed for a further two years, as requested by the Deputy Commissioner. The Court found that the statutory provisions and rules governing the issuance and renewal of writs for the levy of property were satisfied, and that there were no grounds to deny the application for renewal. The Court also noted that Mr. Ziolkowski did not raise any significant arguments against the renewal of the writ. Consequently, the Court ordered the writ to be renewed until 1 April 2021, and made no order as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to r 39.20 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) the period that the Writ for Levy of Property issued against the respondent on 1 April 2019 (as amended) has effect be renewed until 1 April 2021.

2. There be no order as to costs.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.