Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd

Case [2010] FCA 490


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 490

Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 490
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v BEECHAM SMALLWOOD FINANCIAL SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 057 701 407
File number: QUD 45 of 2010
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2010
Date of hearing: 14 May 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: A member of the Australian Taxation Office, appearing pursuant to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth)
Solicitor for the Defendant: Hall Lawyers

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

QUD 45 of 2010

BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Plaintiff

AND:

BEECHAM SMALLWOOD FINANCIAL SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 057 701 407
Defendant

JUDGE:

LOGAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

14 MAY 2010

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application is adjourned for hearing at 9.30 am on Friday 4 June 2010.

2.An affidavit sworn by a director of the defendant to which is to be exhibited the latest balance sheet and profit and loss account, including such changes, if any, as in the opinion of the directors, are material since the date of preparation of the balance sheet and profit and loss account in respect of assets, income, liabilities and debts, of the defendant is to be filed and served on the plaintiff on or before 28 May 2010.

3.The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff’s costs, if any, of and incidental to, the adjournment.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

QUD 45 of 2010

BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Plaintiff

AND:

BEECHAM SMALLWOOD FINANCIAL SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 057 701 407
Defendant

JUDGE:

LOGAN J

DATE:

14 MAY 2010

PLACE:

BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (the Commissioner) has sought the winding up of Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd (the Company).  The basis for the application is a failure on the part of the Company to comply with a statutory demand.  The foundation for that demand lies in goods and services tax and related penalties, outstanding Pay As You Go instalments and, in respect of each of those, related general interest charges.  The application for winding up was filed on 19 February 2010.  It has been the subject of a number of adjournments before the Registrar since then.  The debt, the subject of the statutory demand, is stated to be $49,411.38.  Whilst I did not have, as one might have hoped, evidence before me today that this sum, or some other sum, is outstanding, it seems common ground that it is outstanding. 

  2. The Company is not without assets.  Its assets are, as deposed to by its director, Mr Brett Smallwood, in an affidavit filed on 16 April 2010.  Apart from the debt to the Commonwealth, payable to the Commissioner, which I have mentioned, the only other liability attested to by Mr Smallwood, is a debt in the sum of about $2,182.87, in respect of the hire of a photocopier, used by the business. 

  3. The Company, I was informed without objection, carries on business as a service Company to a financial planning business.  It seems, thus, that the only third party with which it deals is the Company from whom the photocopier has been obtained.  Otherwise, it does not deal more generally with the public. 

  4. It appears, from the evidence read today, that Mr Brett Smallwood, the director, has been able to prevail upon his parents to provide finance to the Company, dependent upon the fate of an application which his parents have made to BankWest, for the provision of a loan, in an amount up to $60,000.  A letter of 12 May 2010, from BankWest to Mr Desmond Smallwood, Mr Brett Smallwood’s father, states that BankWest has assessed the financial position of Mr Desmond Smallwood and his wife and determined that they qualify for a loan in the sum, or up to the sum mentioned.  The letter further states:

    Although we have indicated that you qualify for the above loan/s, this letter is not an offer for finance.  Before we can formally offer you finance and provide you with a loan contract the following conditions will need to be met to the satisfaction of the Bank.

  5. What then follows is a list of bank requirements, including materially, a mortgage over a property at Ipswich, and if the bank so requires, a security assessment and inspection of that property.  I was informed without objection that such an assessment occurred this morning. 

  6. There is nothing on the evidence which would suggest that, in the event that the Company were wound up, the liquidator would be able to look to either Mr Desmond Smallwood or his wife for payment of the debts of the Company.  In other words, there is, at the moment, a prospect that the Company’s creditors (and that means, overwhelmingly, the Commonwealth of Australia) will receive payment in full, whereas it is somewhat conjectural in the event of a winding up that the creditors will receive 100 cents in the dollar, having regard to the costs necessarily entailed in a liquidation.

  7. The evidence, at the moment, in respect of the Company’s position is not completely satisfactory.  It does, though, at least take one to the position that there is but a small risk, so far as third parties are concerned, of their suffering prejudice if a Company, which prima facie is taken to be insolvent, continues to trade for a short time.  On the other hand, there is the benefit that I have mentioned, potentially there, if the Company is not wound up today. 

  8. There is a discretion to exercise in respect of whether or not to proceed to the winding up of the Company today.  I propose making a direction which would require the Company, by its director, to file an affidavit deposing to the current balance sheet and profit and loss account of the Company, together with any changes considered by the director to be material since the date those accounts have been prepared, within fourteen (14) days from today.  It seems that within three weeks from today, the fate of a BankWest loan application will be known. 

  9. There are competing considerations as to whether to proceed to winding up today, which are evident enough from what I have already stated.  The Commissioner has rightly emphasised the undesirability of companies taken to be insolvent to be permitted to continue to trade.  On the other hand, there is the prospect of full payment of the Company’s debts, particularly its debt to the Commonwealth, which is of interest to the Commissioner.  Further, that the Company is able to call on a source of finance, albeit from family, does suggest that it is not regarded by those who manage it as unworthy of preservation.  In the circumstances, my opinion is that the public interest is better served by a short adjournment of this application.

I certify that the preceding nine (9) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Logan.

Associate:

Dated:        18 May 2010

Details
AGLC
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 490
Case
[2010] FCA 490
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court of Australia dealt with an application by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation seeking the winding up of Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd due to the company's failure to comply with a statutory demand. The demand was based on unpaid goods and services tax, related penalties, outstanding Pay As You Go instalments, and associated general interest charges, totaling $49,411.38. The application was heard by Justice Logan, who considered the implications of winding up the company against allowing it to continue trading for a short period, pending the outcome of a potential loan from BankWest. Beecham Smallwood Financial Services Pty Ltd, operated as a service company for a financial planning business, had limited dealings outside its primary client.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the company should be wound up immediately or if the application should be adjourned to allow the company to potentially secure a loan from BankWest, which could cover its outstanding debts. The court had to balance the public interest in preventing insolvent companies from continuing to trade against the potential benefit to creditors if the company could secure the necessary funds to settle its debts. The court also considered the possibility that the company's director, Mr. Brett Smallwood, might be able to secure a loan from his parents, contingent on the approval of the BankWest application.

Justice Logan decided to adjourn the application, citing the potential for full repayment of the company's debts if the BankWest loan was approved. The court reasoned that there was a minimal risk to third parties if the company continued to trade for a short period, and the potential benefit to the Commissioner of receiving full payment outweighed the risk of delay. The court ordered the company to file an updated affidavit deposing to its current financial position within fourteen days. This decision was made to allow time for the BankWest loan application to be processed and to ensure that the latest financial information was available to the court for its next hearing.

The court's final orders included adjourning the application to a later date, requiring the company to file an updated financial affidavit, and directing the company to pay the plaintiff's costs associated with the adjournment. This decision reflects the court's discretionary approach in balancing the interests of the creditors and the potential for the company to resolve its financial difficulties through alternative means.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.