FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY & KELLS | [2009] FamCA 452 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILD ABDUCTION – Hague Convention – Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations1986 – construction of Regulation 16(2)(c) “settled in his or her new environment” – whether the child so “settled” – whether a discretionary power exists per Regulations 15(1) and 16(2) – the criteria for the exercise of discretion – whether the discretion be exercised in favour of one of the parties |
| Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations 1986 Regulations 14, 15(1), 16(2), 16(3) |
| Townsend v Director-General, Department of Families, Youth and Community Care (1999) FLC 92-842 State Central Authority & Uurainen (No.2) [2008] FamCA 1046 |
| APPLICANT: | Director-General Department of Communities (Child Safety Services) |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Kells |
| FILE NUMBER: | BRC | 1299 | of | 2009 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 29 May 2009 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Brisbane |
| JUDGMENT OF: | The Hon. Justice Rose |
| HEARING DATE: | 18 May 2009 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Crown Law |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | K. Parrott |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Journey Family Lawyers |
Orders
That the Application of the Applicant filed 16 February 2009 is dismissed.
That Orders numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 made 25 February 2009 are discharged.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Department of Child Safety & Kells is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
FILE NUMBER: BRC 1299 of 2009
| DIRECTOR-GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES (CHILD SAFETY SERVICES) |
Applicant
And
| MS KELLS |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
In these proceedings the applicant seeks an order for the return of the child pursuant to the Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Act and Regulations 1986.
The application filed 16 February 2009 (“the Application”) is made pursuant to Regulation 14.
Orders are sought pursuant to Regulation 15.
The child the subject of these proceedings is a daughter born in July 1997 (“the child”).
The child was born in New Zealand.
The parents are the respondent mother and Mr MT.
The mother resides in Australia.
The father resides in New Zealand.
The child resides with the mother.
The mother and the father lived together in New Zealand for a period of about 8 years which commenced in 1996 and concluded when they separated in 2004.
On 9 January 2008 the mother and child left New Zealand and commenced to live in Australia. The mother has lived in Australia with…
Continue reading Department of Child Safety and Kells
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Department of Child Safety and Kells [2009] FamCA 452
- Case
- [2009] FamCA 452
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether to grant the Department's application and, consequently, the status of certain orders made on 25 February 2009.
Justice Rose dismissed the Department's application. As a result, the orders made on 25 February 2009 were discharged.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the Application of the Applicant filed 16 February 2009 is dismissed.
2.
That Orders numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 made 25 February 2009 are discharged.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.