FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dempsey Resources Pty Ltd v Continental Coal Ltd [2009] FCA 1157
CORPORATIONS - extension of time for lodging change of details of a charge - s 264(4) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - failure due to inadvertence - short delay - remedial steps taken promptly - extension granted.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 262(1), 266(3), (4)(a), 268(2)
Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltdv Exceed Pty Ltd (2004) 48 ACSR 670
Investa Properties Ltd v Westpac Property Funds Management Ltd (2001) 40 ACSR 124
National Australia Bank Ltd v David & Waddell (Vic)Pty Ltd (2003) 44 ACSR 296
Re Kris Cruisers Ltd [1948] 2 All ER 1105
Sanwa Australia Finance Ltd v Ground-Breakers Pty Ltd (in liq) [1991] 2 Qd R 456
Standard Chartered Finance Ltd v De Barros Nominees Pty Ltd (in liq) (1988) 7 ACLC 15
Vector Capital Ltd v SNS Software Network Systems Pty Ltd (1988) 12 NSWLR 1DEMPSEY RESOURCES PTY LTD (ACN 100 305 486), PERPETUAL CORPORATE TRUST LIMITED (ACN 000 341 533) and LINQ FINANCE NO 2 PTY LTD (ACN 134 962 182) v CONTINENTAL COAL LTD (ACN 009 125 651)
WAD 153 of 2009
GILMOUR J
12 OCTOBER 2009
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
WAD 153 of 2009
BETWEEN: DEMPSEY RESOURCES PTY LTD (ACN 100 305 486)
PERPETUAL CORPORATE TRUST LIMITED (ACN 000 341 533)
LINQ FINANCE NO 2 PTY LTD (ACN 134 962 182)
PlaintiffsAND: CONTINENTAL COAL LTD (ACN 009 125 651)
Defendant
JUDGE:
GILMOUR J
DATE OF ORDER:
12 OCTOBER 2009
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The period for lodging a notice of change of details of a charge with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in respect of:
(a)the Increase of Commitment Deed dated 20 April 2009 entered into by the defendant, the first-named plaintiff and the third-named plaintiff be extended to 29 July 2009; and
(b)the Increase of Commitment Deed dated 5 June 2009 entered into by the defendant, the second-named plaintiff and third-named plaintiff be extended to 29 July 2009.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
WAD 153 of 2009
BETWEEN: DEMPSEY RESOURCES PTY LTD (ACN 100 305 486)
PERPETUAL CORPORATE TRUST LIMITED (ACN 000 341 533)
LINQ FINANCE NO 2 PTY LTD (ACN 134 962 182)
PlaintiffsAND: CONTINENTAL COAL LTD (ACN 009 125 651)
Defendant
JUDGE:
GILMOUR J
DATE:
12 OCTOBER 2009
PLACE:
PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Relief sought
The plaintiffs’ application is for orders to extend time for the lodging of notices of change of details of a charge in respect of certain charges (Notices) with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
The Notices pertain to:
(a)the Increase of Commitment Deed dated 20 April 2009 entered into by Continental, Dempsey and LinQ Finance respectively (Dempsey…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Dempsey Resources Pty Ltd v Continental Coal Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2009] FCA 1157
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the court had to decide was whether the plaintiffs' failure to lodge the notices within the statutory time frame could be excused due to the inadvertent nature of the oversight. The court had to consider whether the plaintiffs had acted diligently and whether there were any extenuating circumstances that warranted an extension of the time limit. Additionally, the court needed to assess the implications of the missed deadlines on the enforceability of the charges and the potential consequences for the parties involved.
In determining the application, the court found that the plaintiffs' failure to lodge the notices was indeed inadvertent. The court took into account the plaintiffs' conduct and concluded that they had acted diligently in attempting to rectify the oversight as soon as it was discovered. The court emphasised the importance of lodging these notices to ensure transparency and compliance with regulatory requirements. However, the court also recognised that inadvertent failures could occur and that the law should accommodate such situations where appropriate. Therefore, the court decided to grant the plaintiffs' application for an extension of time to lodge the notices. This decision balanced the need for compliance with the regulatory regime and the practical realities of the plaintiffs' situation.
The court's orders granted the plaintiffs an extension of time to lodge the notices of change of details of the charges. Specifically, the court extended the period for lodging the notices in relation to the Increase of Commitment Deeds dated 20 April 2009 and 5 June 2009 to 29 July 2009. This extension allowed the plaintiffs to comply with the statutory requirements and avoid potential penalties or legal complications arising from the missed deadlines.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The period for lodging a notice of change of details of a charge with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in respect of:
(a) the Increase of Commitment Deed dated 20 April 2009 entered into by the defendant, the first-named plaintiff and the third-named plaintiff be extended to 29 July 2009; and
(b) the Increase of Commitment Deed dated 5 June 2009 entered into by the defendant, the second-named plaintiff and third-named plaintiff be extended to 29 July 2009.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: GILMOUR J
Full text does not contain this section.