Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)
An Act to enact in New South Wales provisions to promote uniform laws of defamation in Australia; to repeal the Defamation Act 1974; to amend the Crimes Act 1900 in relation to criminal defamation; to amend the Limitation Act 1969 in relation to the limitation period for defamation actions; and for other purposes.
This Act is the Defamation Act 2005.
This Act commences on 1 January 2006.
The objects of this Act are—
(a) to enact provisions to promote uniform laws of defamation in Australia, and
(b) to ensure that the law of defamation does not place unreasonable limits on freedom of expression and, in particular, on the publication and discussion of matters of public interest and importance, and
(c) to provide effective and fair remedies for persons whose reputations are harmed by the publication of defamatory matter, and
(d) to promote speedy and non-litigious methods of resolving disputes about the publication of defamatory matter.
In this Act—
(a) to remove the matter, or
(b) to block, disable or otherwise prevent access, whether by some or all persons, to the matter.
(a) a State, or
(b) a Territory, or
(c) the Commonwealth.
(a) a federation and a state, territory, province or other part of a federation, and
(b) an Australian jurisdiction.
There may be more than 1 digital intermediary in relation to the publication of the same digital matter.
(a) anything on which there is writing, and
(b) anything on which there are marks, figures, symbols or perforations having a meaning for persons qualified to interpret them, and
(c) anything from which sounds, images or writings can be reproduced with or without the aid of anything else, and
(d) a map, plan, drawing or photograph.
(a) the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law—
(i) as in force from time to time, set out in the Schedule to the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 of Queensland, and
(ii) as it applies (including with any modifications) as a law of New South Wales or another State or Territory, or
(b) the law of another State or Territory that substantially corresponds to the law referred to in paragraph (a).
(a) an article, report, advertisement or other thing communicated by means of a newspaper, magazine or other periodical, and
(b) a program, report, advertisement or other thing communicated by means of television, radio, the Internet or any other form of electronic communication, and
(c) a letter, note or other writing, and
(d) a picture, gesture or oral utterance, and
(e) any other thing by means of which something may be communicated to a person.
(a) to access or connect to the internet, or
(b) to use the internet to do 1 or more of the following—
(i) send or receive content,
(ii) store content,
(iii) index content,
(iv) search for content,
(v) share content,
(vi) interact with other persons.
1 An internet-based social media platform.
2 A forum created or administered by a person using a facility provided by an internet-based social media platform that enables users to share content or interact with other users about a topic.
3 A website or other internet-based platform that enables knowledge to be shared by or with its users.
(a) a parliament or legislature of any country, or
(b) a house of a parliament or legislature of any country, or
(c) a committee of a parliament or legislature of any country, or
(d) a committee of a house or houses of a parliament or legislature of any country.
An example or note at the foot of a provision forms part of this Act.
An example in this Act—
(a) is not exhaustive, and
(b) may extend, but does not limit, the meaning of the provision to which it relates.
This Act binds the Crown in right of this jurisdiction and, in so far as the legislative power of the Parliament of this jurisdiction permits, the Crown in all its other capacities.
This Act relates to the tort of defamation at general law.
This Act does not affect the operation of the general law in relation to the tort of defamation except to the extent that this Act provides otherwise (whether expressly or by necessary implication).
Without limiting subsection (2), the general law as it is from time to time applies for the purposes of this Act as if the following legislation had never been enacted—
(a) the Defamation Act 1958,
(b) the Defamation Act 1974.
The distinction at general law between slander and libel is abolished.
Accordingly, the publication of defamatory matter of any kind is actionable without proof of special damage.
A person has a single cause of action for defamation in relation to the publication of defamatory matter about the person even if more than one defamatory imputation about the person is carried by the matter.
A corporation has no cause of action for defamation in relation to the publication of defamatory matter about the corporation unless it was an excluded corporation at the time of the publication.
A corporation is an excluded corporation if—
(a) the objects for which it is formed do not include obtaining financial gain for its members or corporators, or
(b) it has fewer than 10 employees and is not an associated entity of another corporation,
and the corporation is not a public body.
In counting employees for the purposes of subsection (2) (b), part-time employees are to be taken into account as an appropriate fraction of a full-time equivalent.
(Repealed)
Subsection (1) does not affect any cause of action for defamation that an individual associated with a corporation has in relation to the publication of defamatory matter about the individual even if the publication of the same matter also defames the corporation.
In this section—
(a) engaged in the day to day operations of the corporation other than as a volunteer, and
(b) subject to the control and direction of the corporation.
A person (including a personal representative of a deceased person) cannot assert, continue or enforce a cause of action for defamation in relation to—
(a) the publication of defamatory matter about a deceased person (whether published before or after his or her death), or
(b) the publication of defamatory matter by a person who has died since publishing the matter.
Subsection (1) does not prevent a court, if it considers it in the interests of justice to do so, from determining the question of costs for proceedings discontinued because of the subsection.
It is an element (the
For the purposes of subsection (1), harm to the reputation of an excluded corporation is not serious harm unless it has caused, or is likely to cause, the corporation serious financial loss.
The judicial officer (and not the jury) in defamation proceedings is to determine whether the serious harm element is established.
Without limiting subsection (3), the judicial officer may (whether on the application of a party or on the judicial officer’s own motion)—
(a) determine whether the serious harm element is established at any time before the trial for the proceedings commences or during the trial, and
(b) make any orders the judicial officer considers appropriate concerning the determination of the issue (including dismissing the proceedings if satisfied the element is not established).
If a party applies for the serious harm element to be determined before the trial for the proceedings commences, the judicial officer is to determine the issue as soon as practicable before the trial commences unless satisfied that there are special circumstances justifying the postponement of the determination to a later stage of the proceedings (including during the trial).
The matters a judicial officer may take into account in deciding whether there are special circumstances for the purposes of subsection (5) include (but are not limited to) the following—
(a) the cost implications for the parties,
(b) the resources available to the court at the time,
(c) the extent to which establishing the serious harm element is linked to other issues for determination during the trial for the proceedings.
Without limiting subsection (5), the judicial officer may determine the serious harm element is not established on the pleadings without the need for further evidence if satisfied that the pleaded particulars are insufficient to establish the element.
Nothing in this section limits the powers that a judicial officer may have apart from this section to dismiss defamation proceedings (whether before or after the trial commences).
In this division—
A service for temporarily and automatically storing files that are most frequently downloaded by users of a website to speed up the download time for the files.
1 A service provided by an internet service provider enabling its users to connect to the internet.
2 An internet-based service enabling its users to send emails or send text messages to other persons.
(a) the title of the webpage,
(b) a hyperlink to the webpage,
(c) an extract from the webpage,
(d) an image from the webpage.
An internet-based cloud service enabling its users to store documents, videos or photographs for later retrieval.
A digital intermediary is not liable for defamation for the publication of digital matter if the intermediary proves—
(a) the matter was published using 1 or more of the following services provided by the intermediary—
(i) a caching service,
(ii) a conduit service,
(iii) a storage service, and
(b) the intermediary’s role in the publication was limited to providing 1 or more of the services mentioned in paragraph (a), and
(c) the intermediary did not do any of the following—
(i) initiate the steps required to publish the matter,
(ii) select any of the recipients of the matter,
(iii) encourage the poster of the matter to publish the matter,
(iv) edit the content of the matter, whether before or after it was published,
(v) promote the matter, whether before or after it was published.
Subsection (1)(c) does not apply in relation to action taken because it is required by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction or an order of an Australian court or Australian tribunal.
Action taken to comply with a code of conduct or other document regulating conduct that a digital intermediary is required to comply with by a law of an Australian jurisdiction.
Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the digital intermediary knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital matter was defamatory.
A search engine provider for a search engine is not liable for defamation for—
(a) the publication of digital matter comprised of search results if the provider’s role was limited to providing an automated process for the user of the search engine to generate the results, or
(b) the publication of digital matter to which the search results provide a hyperlink if the provider’s role in the publication of the matter is limited to the role mentioned in paragraph (a).
Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to search results, or to digital matter to which the search results provide hyperlinks, to the extent the results are promoted or prioritised by the search engine provider because of a payment or other benefit given to the provider by or on behalf of a third party.
Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the search engine provider knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital matter was defamatory.
The judicial officer in defamation proceedings—
(a) is to determine whether a defendant has a digital intermediary exemption, and
(b) is to determine whether a digital intermediary exemption is established as soon as practicable before the trial for the proceedings commences unless satisfied that there are good reasons to postpone the determination to a later stage of the proceedings, and
(c) may make any orders the judicial officer considers appropriate concerning the determination of the issue, including dismissing the proceedings if satisfied the digital intermediary exemption is established.
Without limiting subsection (1)—
(a) the following matters are relevant in deciding whether there are good reasons to postpone the determination of whether a digital intermediary exemption is established to a later stage of the proceedings—
(i) the cost implications for the parties,
(ii) the resources available to the court at the time,
(iii) the extent to which technical or scientific issues are raised in the proceedings,
(iv) the extent to which establishing the digital intermediary exemption is linked to other issues for determination during the trial for the proceedings, and
(b) the judicial officer may determine a digital intermediary exemption is established on the pleadings without the need for further evidence if satisfied that the pleaded particulars are sufficient to establish the exemption.
Nothing in this section limits the powers that a judicial officer may have apart from this section to dismiss defamation proceedings, whether before or after the trial for the proceedings commences.
In this section—
If a matter is published wholly within a particular Australian jurisdictional area, the substantive law that is applicable in that area must be applied in this jurisdiction to determine any cause of action for defamation based on the publication.
If there is a multiple publication of matter in more than one Australian jurisdictional area, the substantive law applicable in the Australian jurisdictional area with which the harm occasioned by the publication as a whole has its closest connection must be applied in this jurisdiction to determine each cause of action for defamation based on the publication.
In determining the Australian jurisdictional area with which the harm occasioned by a publication of matter has its closest connection, a court may take into account—
(a) the place at the time of publication where the plaintiff was ordinarily resident or, in the case of a corporation that may assert a cause of action for defamation, the place where the corporation had its principal place of business at that time, and
(b) the extent of publication in each relevant Australian jurisdictional area, and
(c) the extent of harm sustained by the plaintiff in each relevant Australian jurisdictional area, and
(d) any other matter that the court considers relevant.
For the purposes of this section, the
In this section—
(a) the geographical area of Australia that lies within the territorial limits of a particular State (including its coastal waters), but not including any territory, place or other area referred to in paragraph (c), or
(b) the geographical area of Australia that lies within the territorial limits of a particular Territory (including its coastal waters), but not including any territory, place or other area referred to in paragraph (c), or
(c) any territory, place or other geographical area of Australia over which the Commonwealth has legislative competence but over which no State or Territory has legislative competence.
(a) the territorial sea of Australia, and
(b) the external Territories of the Commonwealth.
This Division applies if a person (the
The provisions of this Division may be used instead of the provisions of any rules of court or any other law in relation to payment into court or offers of compromise.
Nothing in this Division prevents a publisher or aggrieved person from making or accepting a settlement offer in relation to the publication of the matter in question otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this Division.
For the purpose of this Act, a notice is a
(a) the notice—
(i) is in writing, and
(ii) specifies the location where the matter in question can be accessed (for example, a webpage address), and
(iii) informs the publisher of the defamatory imputations that the aggrieved person considers are or may be carried about the aggrieved person by the matter in question (the
imputations of concern ), and(iv) informs the publisher of the harm that the person considers to be serious harm to the person’s reputation caused, or likely to be caused, by the publication of the matter in question, and
(v) for an aggrieved person that is an excluded corporation—also informs the publisher of the financial loss that the corporation considers to be serious financial loss caused, or likely to be caused, by the publication of the matter in question, and
(b) a copy of the matter in question is, if practicable, provided to the publisher together with the notice.
Section 12B requires a concerns notice to be given before proceedings for defamation can be commenced.
For the avoidance of doubt, a document that is required to be filed or lodged to commence defamation proceedings cannot be used as a concerns notice.
If a concerns notice fails to particularise adequately any of the information required by subsection (1)(a)(ii), (iii), (iv) or (v), the publisher may give the aggrieved person a written notice (a
An aggrieved person to whom a further particulars notice is given must provide the reasonable further particulars specified in the notice within 14 days (or any further period agreed by the publisher and aggrieved person) after being given the notice.
An aggrieved person who fails to provide the reasonable further particulars specified in a further particulars notice within the applicable period is taken not to have given the publisher a concerns notice for the purposes of this section.
An aggrieved person cannot commence defamation proceedings unless—
(a) the person has given the proposed defendant a concerns notice in respect of the matter concerned, and
(b) the imputations to be relied on by the person in the proposed proceedings were particularised in the concerns notice, and
(c) the applicable period for an offer to make amends has elapsed.
Subsection (1)(b) does not prevent reliance on—
(a) some, but not all, of the imputations particularised in a concerns notice, or
(b) imputations that are substantially the same as those particularised in a concerns notice.
The court may grant leave for proceedings to be commenced despite non-compliance with subsection (1)(c), but only if the proposed plaintiff satisfies the court—
(a) the commencement of proceedings after the end of the applicable period for an offer to make amends contravenes the limitation law, or
(b) it is just and reasonable to grant leave.
The commencement of proceedings contravenes the limitation law for the purposes of subsection (3)(a) if the proceedings could not be commenced after the end of the applicable period for an offer to make amends because the court will have ceased to have power to extend the limitation period.
In this section—
The publisher may make an offer to make amends to the aggrieved person.
The offer may be—
(a) in relation to the matter in question generally, or
(b) limited to any particular defamatory imputations that the publisher accepts that the matter in question carries.
If 2 or more persons published the matter in question, an offer to make amends by one or more of them does not affect the liability of the other or others.
An offer to make amends is taken to have been made without prejudice, unless the offer provides otherwise.
An offer to make amends cannot be made if—
(a) the applicable period for an offer to make amends has expired, or
(b) a defence has been served in an action brought by the aggrieved person against the publisher in relation to the matter in question.
For the purposes of this Act, the
(a) if the aggrieved person has provided further particulars in response to a further particulars notice about a concerns notice after 14 days have elapsed since the concerns notice was given—14 days since the publisher was given the further particulars, or
(b) in any other case—28 days since the publisher was given a concerns notice by the aggrieved person.
If a publisher gives more than one further particulars notice, subsection (2)(a) applies only in respect of the first notice.
(Repealed)
An offer to make amends—
(a) must be in writing, and
(b) must be readily identifiable as an offer to make amends under this Division, and
(b1) must provide for the offer to be open for acceptance for at least 28 days commencing on the day the offer is made, and
(c) if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations—must state that the offer is so limited and particularise the imputations to which the offer is limited, and
(d) must include an offer to publish, or join in publishing, a reasonable correction of, or a clarification of or additional information about, the matter in question or, if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations, the imputations to which the offer is limited, and
(e) if material containing the matter has been given to someone else by the publisher or with the publisher’s knowledge—must include an offer to take, or join in taking, reasonable steps to tell the other person that the matter is or may be defamatory of the aggrieved person, and
(f) must include an offer to pay the expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person before the offer was made and the expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person in considering the offer.
(g) (Repealed)
In addition to the matters referred to in subsection (1), an offer to make amends may include any other kind of offer, or particulars of any other action taken by the publisher, to redress the harm sustained by the aggrieved person because of the matter in question, including (but not limited to)—
(a) an offer to publish, or join in publishing, an apology in relation to the matter in question or, if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations, the imputations to which the offer is limited, or
(b) if the matter is digital matter—an offer to take access prevention steps in relation to the matter, or
(c) an offer to pay compensation for any economic or non-economic loss of the aggrieved person, or
(d) the particulars of any correction or apology made, or action taken, before the date of the offer.
If the matter in question is digital matter, an offer to take access prevention steps may be made instead of, or in addition to, either or both of the offers mentioned in subsection (1)(d) and (e).
Without limiting subsection (1A)(c), an offer to pay compensation may comprise or include any one or more of the following—
(a) an offer to pay a stated amount,
(b) an offer to pay an amount to be agreed between the publisher and the aggrieved person,
(c) an offer to pay an amount determined by an arbitrator appointed, or agreed on, by the publisher and the aggrieved person,
(d) an offer to pay an amount determined by a court.
If an offer to make amends is accepted, a court may, on the application of the aggrieved person or publisher, determine—
(a) if the offer provides for a court to determine the amount of compensation payable under the offer—the amount of compensation to be paid under the offer, and
(b) any other question that arises about what must be done to carry out the terms of the offer.
The powers conferred on a court by subsection (3) are exercisable—
(a) if the aggrieved person has brought proceedings against the publisher in any court for defamation in relation to the matter in question, by that court in those proceedings, and
(b) except as provided in paragraph (a), by the Supreme Court.
An offer to make amends may be withdrawn before it is accepted by notice in writing given to the aggrieved person.
A publisher who has withdrawn an offer to make amends may make a renewed offer.
A renewed offer may (but need not) be in the same terms as the withdrawn offer.
A renewed offer is to be treated as a new offer (including for the purposes of section 14).
However, the time limit specified in section 14 for the making of offers to make amends does not prevent the making of a renewed offer that is not in the same terms as the withdrawn offer if—
(a) the renewed offer represents a genuine attempt by the publisher to address matters of concern raised by the aggrieved person about the withdrawn offer, and
(b) the renewed offer is made within 14 days after the withdrawal of the withdrawn offer or any other period agreed by the publisher and the aggrieved person.
If the publisher carries out the terms of an offer to make amends (including payment of any compensation under the offer) that is accepted, the aggrieved person cannot assert, continue or enforce an action for defamation against the publisher in relation to the matter in question even if the offer was limited to any particular defamatory imputations.
A court may (but need not)—
(a) order the publisher to pay the aggrieved person the expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person as a result of accepting the offer, and
(b) order any costs incurred by the aggrieved person that form part of those expenses to be assessed on an indemnity basis.
The powers conferred on a court by subsection (2) are exercisable—
(a) if the aggrieved person has brought proceedings against the publisher in any court for defamation in relation to the matter in question, by that court in those proceedings, and
(b) except as provided in paragraph (a), by the Supreme Court.
If an offer to make amends is made in relation to the matter in question but is not accepted, it is a defence to an action for defamation against the publisher in relation to the matter if—
(a) the publisher made the offer as soon as reasonably practicable after the publisher was given a concerns notice in respect of the matter (and, in any event, within the applicable period for an offer to make amends), and
(b) the publisher was ready and willing, on acceptance of the offer by the aggrieved person, to carry out the terms of the offer, and
(c) in all the circumstances the offer was reasonable.
In determining whether an offer to make amends is reasonable, a court—
(a) must have regard to any correction or apology published before any trial arising out of the matter in question, including the extent to which the correction or apology is brought to the attention of the audience of the matter in question taking into account—
(i) the prominence given to the correction or apology as published in comparison to the prominence given to the matter in question as published, and
(ii) the period that elapses between publication of the matter in question and publication of the correction or apology, and
(b) may have regard to—
(i) whether the aggrieved person refused to accept an offer that was limited to any particular defamatory imputations because the aggrieved person did not agree with the publisher about the imputations that the matter in question carried, and
(ii) any other matter that the court considers relevant.
Despite section 22(2), the judicial officer (and not the jury) in defamation proceedings tried by jury is to determine whether a defence under this section is established.
Evidence of any statement or admission made in connection with the making or acceptance of an offer to make amends is not admissible as evidence in any legal proceedings (whether criminal or civil).
Subsection (1) does not prevent the admission of evidence in any legal proceedings in order to determine—
(a) any issue arising under, or relating to the application of, a provision of this Division, or
(b) costs in defamation proceedings.
An apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any defamatory matter alleged to have been published by the person—
(a) does not constitute an express or implied admission of fault or liability by the person in connection with that matter, and
(b) is not relevant to the determination of fault or liability in connection with that matter.
Evidence of an apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any defamatory matter alleged to have been published by the person is not admissible in any civil proceedings as evidence of the fault or liability of the person in connection with that matter.
Nothing in this section limits the operation of section 38.
Unless the court orders otherwise, a plaintiff or defendant in defamation proceedings may elect for the proceedings to be tried by jury.
Without limiting subsection (1), a court may order that defamation proceedings are not to be tried by jury if—
(a) the trial requires a prolonged examination of records, or
(b) the trial involves any technical, scientific or other issue that cannot be conveniently considered and resolved by a jury.
An election must be—
(a) made at the time and in the manner prescribed by the rules of court for the court in which the proceedings are to be tried, and
(b) accompanied by the fee (if any) prescribed by the regulations made under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 for the requisition of a jury in that court.
An election may be revoked only—
(a) with the consent of all the parties to the proceedings, or
(b) if all the parties do not consent, with the leave of the court.
The court may, on the application of a party to the proceedings, grant leave for the purposes of subsection (3)(b) only if satisfied it is in the interests of justice for the election to be revoked.
This section applies to defamation proceedings that are tried by jury.
The jury is to determine whether the defendant has published defamatory matter about the plaintiff and, if so, whether any defence raised by the defendant has been established.
If the jury finds that the defendant has published defamatory matter about the plaintiff and that no defence has been established, the judicial officer and not the jury is to determine the amount of damages (if any) that should be awarded to the plaintiff and all unresolved issues of fact and law relating to the determination of that amount.
If the proceedings relate to more than one cause of action for defamation, the jury must give a single verdict in relation to all causes of action on which the plaintiff relies unless the judicial officer orders otherwise.
Nothing in this section—
(a) affects any law or practice relating to special verdicts, or
(b) requires or permits a jury to determine any issue that, at general law, is an issue to be determined by the judicial officer, or
(c) requires or permits a jury to determine any issue that another provision of this Act requires a judicial officer to determine.
This section applies to a person who has brought defamation proceedings for damages, whether in this jurisdiction or elsewhere, against a person (a
The person may not bring further defamation proceedings for damages against a previous defendant or an associate of a previous defendant in relation to the same or any other publication of the same or like matter, except with the leave of the court in which the further proceedings are to be brought.
A person is an
(a) an employee of the defendant, or
(b) a person publishing matter as a contractor of the defendant, or
(c) an associated entity of the defendant (or an employee or contractor of the associated entity).
This section applies if the court procedure law for a court allows a person seeking to bring defamation proceedings for the publication of digital matter to obtain an order for, or in the nature of, preliminary discovery for either or both of the following purposes—
(a) to obtain information to assist in identifying the posters of the matter,
(b) to obtain information to assist in locating physical or digital addresses for the posters of the matter to allow concerns notices to be given to them or defamation proceedings against them to be commenced.
Despite anything to the contrary in the court procedure law for a court, the court must take the following matters into account before making an order mentioned in subsection (1)—
(a) the objects of this Act,
(b) privacy, safety or other public interest considerations that may arise if the order is made.
Evidence suggesting the poster of digital matter is in fear of domestic violence from the person seeking an order to obtain the poster’s address.
This section does not limit the matters the court may take into account before making an order mentioned in subsection (1).
In this section—
(a) rules of court for the court, or
(b) an Act or other legislation that regulates the practice or procedure of the court, or
(c) the general law concerning the inherent or implied jurisdiction or powers of the court.
A defence under this Division is additional to any other defence or exclusion of liability available to the defendant apart from this Act (including under the general law) and does not of itself vitiate, limit or abrogate any other defence or exclusion of liability.
If a defence under this Division to the publication of defamatory matter may be defeated by proof that the publication was actuated by malice, the general law applies in defamation proceedings in which the defence is raised to determine whether a particular publication of matter was actuated by malice.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the defamatory imputations carried by the matter of which the plaintiff complains are substantially true.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter carried one or more imputations that are substantially true (
contextual imputations ), and(b) any defamatory imputations of which the plaintiff complains that are not contextual imputations and are also carried by the matter do not further harm the reputation of the plaintiff because of the substantial truth of the contextual imputations.
The contextual imputations on which the defendant may rely to establish the defence include imputations of which the plaintiff complains.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that it was published on an occasion of absolute privilege.
Without limiting subsection (1), matter is published on an occasion of absolute privilege if—
(a) the matter is published in the course of the proceedings of a parliamentary body, including (but not limited to)—
(i) the publication of a document by order, or under the authority, of the body, and
(ii) the publication of the debates and proceedings of the body by or under the authority of the body or any law, and
(iii) the publication of matter while giving evidence before the body, and
(iv) the publication of matter while presenting or submitting a document to the body, or
(b) the matter is published in the course of the proceedings of an Australian court or Australian tribunal, including (but not limited to)—
(i) the publication of matter in any document filed or lodged with, or otherwise submitted to, the court or tribunal (including any originating process), and
(ii) the publication of matter while giving evidence before the court or tribunal, and
(iii) the publication of matter in any judgment, order or other determination of the court or tribunal, or
(b1) the matter is published to a person who, at the time of the publication, is an official of a police force or service of an Australian jurisdiction and it is published to the official while the official is acting in an official capacity, or
(c) the matter is published on an occasion that, if published in another Australian jurisdiction, would be an occasion of absolute privilege in that jurisdiction under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section, or
(d) the matter is published by a person or body in any circumstances specified in Schedule 1.
In this section—
(a) an officer, employee or member of staff of the police force or service, or
(b) another person engaged to act for or on behalf of the police force or service.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the matter was contained in—
(a) a public document or a fair copy of a public document, or
(b) a fair summary of, or a fair extract from, a public document.
For the purposes of subsection (1), if a report or other document under the law of a country would be a public document except for non-compliance with a provision of that law about—
(a) the formal requirements for the content or layout of the report or document, or
(b) the time within which the report or document is prepared, or presented, submitted, tabled or laid to or before a person or body,
the report or document is a public document despite that non-compliance.
A defence established under subsection (1) is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter was not published honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education.
In this section,
(a) any report or paper published by a parliamentary body, or a record of votes, debates or other proceedings relating to a parliamentary body published by or under the authority of the body or any law, or
(b) any judgment, order or other determination of a court or arbitral tribunal of any country in civil proceedings and including—
(i) any record of the court or tribunal relating to the judgment, order or determination or to its enforcement or satisfaction, and
(ii) any report of the court or tribunal about its judgment, order or determination and the reasons for its judgment, order or determination, or
(c) any report or other document that under the law of any country—
(i) is authorised to be published, or
(ii) is required to be presented or submitted to, tabled in, or laid before, a parliamentary body, or
(d) any document issued by the government (including a local government) of a country, or by an officer, employee or agency of the government, for the information of the public, or
(e) any record or other document open to inspection by the public that is kept—
(i) by an Australian jurisdiction, or
(ii) by a statutory authority of an Australian jurisdiction, or
(iii) by an Australian court, or
(iv) under legislation of an Australian jurisdiction, or
(f) any other document issued, kept or published by a person, body or organisation of another Australian jurisdiction that is treated in that jurisdiction as a public document under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section, or
(g) any document of a kind specified in Schedule 2.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the matter was, or was contained in, a fair report of any proceedings of public concern.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter was, or was contained in, an earlier published report of proceedings of public concern, and
(b) the matter was, or was contained in, a fair copy of, a fair summary of, or a fair extract from, the earlier published report, and
(c) the defendant had no knowledge that would reasonably make the defendant aware that the earlier published report was not fair.
A defence established under subsection (1) or (2) is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter was not published honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education.
In this section,
(a) any proceedings in public of a parliamentary body, or
(b) any proceedings in public of an international organisation of any countries or of the governments of any countries, or
(c) any proceedings in public of an international conference at which the governments of any countries are represented, or
(d) any proceedings in public of—
(i) the International Court of Justice, or any other judicial or arbitral tribunal, for the decision of any matter in dispute between nations, or
(ii) any other international judicial or arbitral tribunal, or
(e) any proceedings in public of a court or arbitral tribunal of any country, or
(f) any proceedings in public of an inquiry held under the law of any country or under the authority of the government of any country, or
(g) any proceedings in public of a local government body of any Australian jurisdiction, or
(h) proceedings of a learned society, or of a committee or governing body of the society, under its relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about—
(i) a member or members of the society, or
(ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to control by the society, or
(i) proceedings of a sport or recreation association, or of a committee or governing body of the association, under its relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about—
(i) a member or members of the association, or
(ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to control by the association, or
(j) proceedings of a trade association, or of a committee or governing body of the association, under its relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about—
(i) a member or members of the association, or
(ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to control by the association, or
(k) any proceedings of a public meeting (with or without restriction on the people attending) of shareholders of a public company under the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth held anywhere in Australia, or
(l) any proceedings of a public meeting (with or without restriction on the people attending) held anywhere in Australia if the proceedings relate to a matter of public interest, including the advocacy or candidature of a person for public office, or
(m) any proceedings of an ombudsman of any country if the proceedings relate to a report of the ombudsman, or
(n) any proceedings in public of a law reform body of any country, or
(o) any other proceedings conducted by, or proceedings of, a person, body or organisation of another Australian jurisdiction that are treated in that jurisdiction as proceedings of public concern under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section, or
(p) any proceedings of a kind specified in Schedule 3.
In this section—
(a) the objects of which include the advancement of any art, science or religion or the advancement of learning in any field, and
(b) authorised by its constitution—
(i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters connected with those objects, and
(ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or custom, in any part of Australia.
(a) in relation to a learned society—objects of the kind referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of
learned society in this subsection, or(b) in relation to a sport or recreation association—objects of the kind referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of
sport or recreation association in this subsection, or(c) in relation to a trade association—objects of the kind referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of
trade association in this subsection.
(a) the objects of which include the promotion of any game, sport, or pastime to the playing of which or exercise of which the public is admitted as spectators or otherwise and the promotion or protection of the interests of people connected with the game, sport, or pastime, and
(b) authorised by its constitution—
(i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters connected with the game, sport, or pastime, and
(ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or custom, in any part of Australia.
(a) the objects of which include the promotion of any calling, that is to say, a trade, business, industry or profession and the promotion or protection of the interests of people engaged in any calling, and
(b) authorised by its constitution—
(i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters connected with a calling or the conduct of people engaged in the calling, and
(ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or custom, in any part of Australia.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter concerns an issue of public interest, and
(b) the defendant reasonably believed that the publication of the matter was in the public interest.
In determining whether the defence is established, a court must take into account all of the circumstances of the case.
Without limiting subsection (2), the court may take into account the following factors to the extent the court considers them applicable in the circumstances—
(a) the seriousness of any defamatory imputation carried by the matter published,
(b) the extent to which the matter published distinguishes between suspicions, allegations and proven facts,
(c) the extent to which the matter published relates to the performance of the public functions or activities of the person,
(d) whether it was in the public interest in the circumstances for the matter to be published expeditiously,
(e) the sources of the information in the matter published, including the integrity of the sources,
(f) if a source of the information in the matter published is a person whose identity is being kept confidential, whether there is good reason for the person’s identity to be kept confidential (including, for example, to comply with an applicable professional code or standard),
(g) whether the matter published contained the substance of the person’s side of the story and, if not, whether a reasonable attempt was made by the defendant to obtain and publish a response from the person,
(h) any other steps taken to verify the information in the matter published,
(i) the importance of freedom of expression in the discussion of issues of public interest.
Subsection (3) does not—
(a) require each factor referred to in the subsection to be taken into account, or
(b) limit the matters that the court may take into account.
Without affecting the application of section 22 to other defences, the jury (and not the judicial officer) in defamation proceedings tried by jury is to determine whether a defence under this section is established.
There is a defence of qualified privilege for the publication of defamatory matter to a person (the
(a) the recipient has an interest or apparent interest in having information on some subject, and
(b) the matter is published to the recipient in the course of giving to the recipient information on that subject, and
(c) the conduct of the defendant in publishing that matter is reasonable in the circumstances.
For the purposes of subsection (1), a recipient has an apparent interest in having information on some subject if, and only if, at the time of the publication in question, the defendant believes on reasonable grounds that the recipient has that interest.
In determining for the purposes of subsection (1) whether the conduct of the defendant in publishing matter about a person is reasonable in the circumstances, a court may take into account the following factors to the extent the court considers them applicable in the circumstances—
(a) the seriousness of any defamatory imputation carried by the matter published,
(b) the extent to which the matter published distinguishes between suspicions, allegations and proven facts,
(c) the nature of the business environment in which the defendant operates,
(d) whether it was appropriate in the circumstances for the matter to be published expeditiously,
(e) any other steps taken to verify the information in the matter published.
Subsection (3) does not—
(a) require each factor referred to in the subsection to be taken into account, or
(b) limit the matters that the court may take into account.
It is not necessary to prove that the matter published concerned an issue of public interest to establish the defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1).
For the avoidance of doubt, a defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1) is defeated if the plaintiff proves that the publication of the defamatory matter was actuated by malice.
However, a defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1) is not defeated merely because the defamatory matter was published for reward.
Without affecting the application of section 22 to other defences, the jury (and not the judicial officer) in defamation proceedings tried by jury is to determine whether a defence under this section is established.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter was published in a scientific or academic journal (whether published in electronic form or otherwise), and
(b) the matter relates to a scientific or academic issue, and
(c) an independent review of the matter’s scientific or academic merit was carried out before the matter was published in the journal by—
(i) the editor of the journal if the editor has expertise in the scientific or academic issue concerned, or
(ii) one or more persons with expertise in the scientific or academic issue concerned.
If there is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter in a scientific or academic journal because of subsection (1), there is also a defence to the publication of any assessment of the matter in the same journal if the defendant proves that—
(a) the assessment was written by one or more of the persons who carried out the independent review of the matter, and
(b) the assessment was written in the course of that review.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the matter was contained in a fair summary of, or fair extract from, a matter or assessment for which there is a defence because of subsection (1) or (2).
If a journal has more than one editor, a reference in this section to the editor of the journal is to be read as a reference to the editor or editors who were responsible for deciding to publish the matter concerned.
A defence established under this section is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter or assessment was not published honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter was an expression of opinion of the defendant rather than a statement of fact, and
(b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest, and
(c) the opinion is based on proper material.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter was an expression of opinion of an employee or agent of the defendant rather than a statement of fact, and
(b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest, and
(c) the opinion is based on proper material.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the matter was an expression of opinion of a person (the
commentator ), other than the defendant or an employee or agent of the defendant, rather than a statement of fact, and(b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest, and
(c) the opinion is based on proper material.
A defence established under this section is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that—
(a) in the case of a defence under subsection (1)—the opinion was not honestly held by the defendant at the time the defamatory matter was published, or
(b) in the case of a defence under subsection (2)—the defendant did not believe that the opinion was honestly held by the employee or agent at the time the defamatory matter was published, or
(c) in the case of a defence under subsection (3)—the defendant had reasonable grounds to believe that the opinion was not honestly held by the commentator at the time the defamatory matter was published.
For the purposes of this section, an opinion is
(a) the material on which it is based is—
(i) set out in specific or general terms in the published matter, or
(ii) notorious, or
(iii) accessible from a reference, link or other access point included in the matter (for example, a hyperlink on a webpage), or
(iv) otherwise apparent from the context in which the matter is published, and
(b) the material—
(i) is substantially true, or
(ii) was published on an occasion of absolute or qualified privilege (whether under this Act or at general law), or
(iii) was published on an occasion that attracted the protection of a defence under this section or section 28 or 29.
An opinion does not cease to be based on proper material only because some of the material on which it is based is not proper material if the opinion might reasonably be based on such of the material as is proper material.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory digital matter if the defendant proves—
(a) the defendant was a digital intermediary in relation to the publication, and
(b) the defendant had, at the time of the publication, an accessible complaints mechanism for the plaintiff to use, and
(c) if the plaintiff gave the defendant a written complaint under this section about the publication—reasonable access prevention steps, if steps were available, were taken in relation to the publication, whether before the complaint was given or within 7 days after the complaint was given.
1 The defendant is not required to prove paragraph (c) to establish the defence if the plaintiff has not given the defendant a complaint about the publication under this section. Subsection (3) sets out requirements for giving complaints.
2 Subsection (6) defines
accessible complaints mechanism .
For subsection (1)(c), reasonable access prevention steps were taken in relation to the publication of digital matter if—
(a) for access prevention steps taken by the defendant—the steps taken were reasonable for the defendant to take in the circumstances, or
(b) for access prevention steps taken by another person—it was reasonable for the defendant not to take steps because of the steps already taken.
A written complaint is given under this section about the publication of defamatory digital matter if—
(a) the complaint contained information sufficient to enable a reasonable person in the defendant’s circumstances to be made aware of the following—
(i) the name of the plaintiff,
(ii) the matter and where it could be located,
(iii) that the plaintiff considered the matter to be defamatory, and
(b) the complaint was given using an accessible complaints mechanism for the plaintiff to use or given to the defendant in another way permitted by section 44.
A defence under this section is defeated only if the plaintiff proves the defendant was actuated by malice in establishing or providing the online service by means of which the digital matter was published.
A defendant who would otherwise be a digital intermediary in relation to the publication of digital matter does not cease to be a digital intermediary for this section merely because the defendant took steps to detect or identify, or steps to remove, block, disable or otherwise prevent access by persons to, the following—
(a) defamatory or other unlawful content published, or sought to be published, by a person using the online service provided by the defendant,
(b) other content published, or sought to be published, by a person using the online service provided by the defendant that was incompatible with the terms or conditions under which the service was provided.
This subsection allows a defendant to rely on the defence despite the definition of
In this section—
1 An email address or direct messaging address to which a complaint may be sent.
2 A webpage, or a part of a webpage, enabling details about a complaint to be uploaded or inputted.
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
(a) the defendant published the matter merely in the capacity, or as an employee or agent, of a subordinate distributor, and
(b) the defendant neither knew, nor ought reasonably to have known, that the matter was defamatory, and
(c) the defendant’s lack of knowledge was not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant.
For the purposes of subsection (1), a person is a
(a) was not the first or primary distributor of the matter, and
(b) was not the author or originator of the matter, and
(c) did not have any capacity to exercise editorial control over the content of the matter (or over the publication of the matter) before it was first published.
Without limiting subsection (2) (a), a person is not the first or primary distributor of matter merely because the person was involved in the publication of the matter in the capacity of—
(a) a bookseller, newsagent or news-vendor, or
(b) a librarian, or
(c) a wholesaler or retailer of the matter, or
(d) a provider of postal or similar services by means of which the matter is published, or
(e) a broadcaster of a live programme (whether on television, radio or otherwise) containing the matter in circumstances in which the broadcaster has no effective control over the person who makes the statements that comprise the matter, or
(f) a provider of services consisting of—
(i) the processing, copying, distributing or selling of any electronic medium in or on which the matter is recorded, or
(ii) the operation of, or the provision of any equipment, system or service, by means of which the matter is retrieved, copied, distributed or made available in electronic form, or
(g) an operator of, or a provider of access to, a communications system by means of which the matter is transmitted, or made available, by another person over whom the operator or provider has no effective control, or
(h) a person who, on the instructions or at the direction of another person, prints or produces, reprints or reproduces or distributes the matter for or on behalf of that other person.
(Repealed)
In determining the amount of damages to be awarded in any defamation proceedings, the court is to ensure that there is an appropriate and rational relationship between the harm sustained by the plaintiff and the amount of damages awarded.
The maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss that may be awarded in defamation proceedings is $250,000 or any other amount adjusted in accordance with this section from time to time (the
The maximum damages amount is to be awarded only in a most serious case.
Subsection (1) does not limit the court’s power to award aggravated damages if an award of aggravated damages is warranted in the circumstances.
An award of aggravated damages is to be made separately to any award of damages for non-economic loss to which subsection (1) applies.
The Minister is, on or before 1 July 2006 and on or before 1 July in each succeeding year, to declare, by order published in the Gazette, the amount that is to apply, as from the date specified in the order, for the purposes of subsection (1).
For orders under this subsection, see Gazettes No 84 of 30.6.2006, p 5043 (amount declared: $259,500); No 80 of 15.6.2007, p 3793 (amount declared: $267,500); No 72 of 20.6.2008, p 5482 (amount declared $280,500); No 90 of 19.6.2009, p 3137 (amount declared: $294,500); No 79 of 18.6.2010, p 2452 (amount declared: $311,000); No 62 of 24.6.2011, p 4588 (amount declared: $324,000); No 60 of 8.6.2012, p 2369 (amount declared: $339,000); No 65 of 31.5.2013, p 2307 ($355,500); No 52 of 26.6.2015, p 1928 (amount declared: $376,500); No 50 of 17.6.2016, p 1406 (amount declared: $381,000); No 56 of 26.5.2017, p 1782 (amount declared: $389,500); No 66 of 29.6.2018, p 3970 (amount declared: $398,500); No 55 of 31.5.2019, p 1665 (amount declared: $407,500) and No 132 of 26.6.2020, p 3045 (amount declared: $421,000). From April 2021, PCO is no longer updating notes in provisions of in force titles about related gazette notices. To search for related gazette notices, please use the Gazette Search functionality.
The amount declared is to be the amount applicable under subsection (1) (or that amount as last adjusted under this section) adjusted by the percentage change in the amount estimated by the Australian Statistician of the average weekly total earnings of full-time adults in Australia over the 4 quarters preceding the date of the declaration for which those estimates are, at that date, available.
An amount declared for the time being under this section applies to the exclusion of the amount of $250,000 or an amount previously adjusted under this section.
If the Australian Statistician fails or ceases to estimate the amount referred to in subsection (4), the amount declared is to be determined in accordance with the regulations.
In adjusting an amount to be declared for the purposes of subsection (1), the amount determined in accordance with subsection (4) is to be rounded to the nearest $500.
A declaration made or published in the Gazette after 1 July in a year and specifying a date that is before the date it is made or published as the date from which the amount declared by the order is to apply has effect as from that specified date.
In awarding damages for defamation, the court is to disregard the malice or other state of mind of the defendant at the time of the publication of the defamatory matter to which the proceedings relate or at any other time except to the extent that the malice or other state of mind affects the harm sustained by the plaintiff.
A plaintiff cannot be awarded exemplary or punitive damages for defamation.
Evidence is admissible on behalf of the defendant, in mitigation of damages for the publication of defamatory matter, that—
(a) the defendant has made an apology to the plaintiff about the publication of the defamatory matter, or
(b) the defendant has published a correction of the defamatory matter, or
(c) the plaintiff has already recovered damages for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter, or
(d) the plaintiff has brought proceedings for damages for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter, or
(e) the plaintiff has received or agreed to receive compensation for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter.
Nothing in subsection (1) operates to limit the matters that can be taken into account by a court in mitigation of damages.
If the court in defamation proceedings finds for the plaintiff as to more than one cause of action, the judicial officer may assess damages in a single sum.
This section applies in relation to defamation proceedings for the publication of digital matter if—
(a) the plaintiff has obtained judgment for defamation against the defendant in the proceedings, or
(b) a court has granted a temporary injunction or makes another temporary order preventing the defendant from continuing to publish, or from republishing, the matter pending the determination of the proceedings, or
(c) a court has granted a final injunction or makes another final order preventing the defendant from continuing to publish, or from republishing, the matter.
In defamation proceedings to which this section applies, the court may order a digital intermediary who is not a party to the proceedings (a
(a) to prevent or limit the continued publication or republication of the matter, or
(b) to comply with, or otherwise give effect to, the judgment, injunction or other order mentioned in subsection (1).
Without limiting subsection (2), an order under this section may—
(a) require 1 or more steps to be taken, or
(b) require a step to be taken in relation to all, or only some, of the users of an online service.
The court may not make an order under this section against a non-party digital intermediary unless the intermediary has been given an opportunity to be heard about whether it is appropriate for the order to be made.
Despite subsection (4), the court may make a temporary order without giving the non-party digital intermediary an opportunity to be heard about whether it is appropriate to make the order if the court considers it necessary in the circumstances for the order to be made expeditiously pending a subsequent hearing concerning whether a further temporary order or a final order should be made.
An order may be made under this section even if the non-party digital intermediary is not, or may not be, liable for defamation, including because of a defence, for the publication of the digital matter to which the defamation proceedings relate.
This section does not limit other powers the court may have apart from this section to grant injunctions or make other orders requiring a non-party digital intermediary to take access prevention steps or other steps.
In awarding costs in defamation proceedings, the court may have regard to—
(a) the way in which the parties to the proceedings conducted their cases (including any misuse of a party’s superior financial position to hinder the early resolution of the proceedings), and
(b) any other matters that the court considers relevant.
Without limiting subsection (1), a court must (unless the interests of justice require otherwise)—
(a) if defamation proceedings are successfully brought by a plaintiff and costs in the proceedings are to be awarded to the plaintiff—order costs of and incidental to the proceedings to be assessed on an indemnity basis if the court is satisfied that the defendant unreasonably failed to make a settlement offer or agree to a settlement offer proposed by the plaintiff, or
(b) if defamation proceedings are unsuccessfully brought by a plaintiff and costs in the proceedings are to be awarded to the defendant—order costs of and incidental to the proceedings to be assessed on an indemnity basis if the court is satisfied that the plaintiff unreasonably failed to accept a settlement offer made by the defendant.
In this section—
If a document appears to be printed or otherwise produced by means adapted for the production of numerous copies and there is in the document a statement to the effect that the document is printed, produced, published or distributed by or for a particular person, the statement is evidence in defamation proceedings that the document was so printed, produced, published or distributed.
Evidence that a number or part of a document appearing to be a periodical is printed, produced, published or distributed by or for a particular person is evidence in defamation proceedings that a document appearing to be another number or part of the periodical was so printed, produced, published or distributed.
In this section—
If the question whether or not a person committed an offence is in question in defamation proceedings—
(a) proof that the person was convicted of the offence by an Australian court is conclusive evidence that the person committed the offence, and
(b) proof that the person was convicted of the offence by a court of any country (other than an Australian court) or a court martial of any country is evidence that the person committed the offence.
For the purposes of this section, the contents of a document that is evidence of conviction of an offence, and the contents of an information, complaint, indictment, charge sheet or similar document on which a person is convicted of an offence, are admissible in evidence to identify the facts on which the conviction is based.
Subsection (2) does not affect the admissibility of other evidence to identify the facts on which the conviction is based.
In this section,
(a) a conviction that has been set aside or quashed, or
(b) a conviction for an offence for which a person has received a pardon.
A person who is required to answer a question, or to discover or produce a document or thing, in defamation proceedings is not excused from answering the question or discovering or producing the document or thing on the ground that the answer to the question or the discovery or production of the document or thing might tend to incriminate the person of an offence of criminal defamation.
However, any answer given to a question, or document or thing discovered or produced, by a natural person in compliance with the requirement is not admissible in evidence against the person in proceedings for criminal defamation.
For the purposes of this Act, a notice or other document may be given to a person (or a notice or other document may be served on a person)—
(a) in the case of a natural person—
(i) by delivering it to the person personally, or
(ii) by sending it by post to the address specified by the person for the giving or service of documents or, if no such address is specified, the residential or business address of the person last known to the person giving or serving the document, or
(iii) by sending it by facsimile transmission to the facsimile number of the person, or
(iv) by sending it by email, messaging or other electronic communication to an electronic address or location indicated by the person for giving documents to, or serving documents on, the person, or
(cf Act No 18 1974, s 17Q)
Without limiting section 27 (2) (a)–(c), matter that is published—
(a) to or by the Auditor-General in his or her capacity as Auditor-General of a disclosure made in relation to a complaint under Division 7 of Part 3 of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983, or
(b) to or by a member of staff of the Audit Office in his or her capacity as such a member of a disclosure made in relation to a complaint under Division 7 of Part 3 of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983.
Without limiting section 27(2)(a)–(c)—
(a) matter that is published of or concerning a public interest disclosure—if the publication is by the maker of the disclosure and while making the disclosure, or
(b) matter that is published of or concerning a public interest disclosure or a disclosure mentioned in the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022, section 49(1)(b)—if the publication is by an agency or public official and while exercising a function under that Act in relation to the disclosure.
The Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022, section 40(2) applies to subclause (1) in the same way it applies to that Act, section 40(1).
However, subclause (2) does not limit other provisions of this Schedule.
Words used in this clause have the same meanings as in the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022.
(cf Act No 18 1974, s 17R)
Without limiting section 27 (2) (a)–(c), matter that is published—
(a) to or by the Health Care Complaints Commission of or concerning a complaint by a complainant under the Health Care Complaints Act 1993, or
(b) to or by a conciliator for the purpose of the conciliation of a complaint under the Health Care Complaints Act 1993, or
(c) by any such conciliator in a report, or while furnishing information, under section 53 or 54 of the Health Care Complaints Act 1993, or
(d) in a report made under section 30 of the Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (or that section as applied by section 61 of that Act), or
(e) in a report made under section 62 (1) of the Health Care Complaints Act 1993 by the Health Care Complaints Commission constituted under that Act.
Without limiting section 27 (2) (a)–(c), matter that is published—
(a) to or by the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission, or
(b) to or by the Chief Commissioner of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission in his or her capacity as Chief Commissioner, or
(c) to or by the Inspector of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission in his or her capacity as Inspector, or
(d) to any officer or member of staff of the Commission or officer of the Inspector (within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016) in his or her capacity as such an officer or member.
This clause applies in relation to any examination before an examining Commissioner of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission or inquiry before the Inspector of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission or any other matter relating to the powers, authorities, duties or functions of the Commission or Inspector.
(Repealed)
(cf Act No 18 1974, s 17JA)
Without limiting section 27 (2) (a)–(c), matter that is published—
(a) to or by any of the following—
(i) the Board of Surveying and Spatial Information,
(ii) a member of that Board as such a member,
(iii) a committee or subcommittee of that Board, or any member of a committee or subcommittee of that Board,
for the purpose of the making or referral of a complaint of professional incompetence or professional misconduct, or the investigation of such a complaint, made in relation to a registered surveyor under the Surveying and Spatial Information Act 2002, or
(b) by a body or person referred to in paragraph (a) of a report of the decision or determination of the body or person in respect of a complaint, or of the reasons for such a decision or determination, made in relation to a registered surveyor under the Surveying and Spatial Information Act 2002.
Without limiting section 27 (2) (a)–(c), matter that is published to or by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (including matter that is published by that Tribunal in an official report of a decision of that Tribunal or of the reasons of that Tribunal for a decision).
Without limiting section 27(2)(a)–(c), matter published by the Independent Planning Commission or the former Planning Assessment Commission in a report or other document, including an audio/video record, an audio record or a transcription record, under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
In this clause—
Without limiting section 27(2)(a)–(c), matter that is published—
(a) to or by the Anti-slavery Commissioner or an acting Anti-slavery Commissioner in their capacity as the Anti-slavery Commissioner or an acting Anti-slavery Commissioner, or
(b) to a member of staff of the Anti-slavery Commissioner in their capacity as a member, or
(c) in a strategic plan under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, section 11, or
(d) in a report under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, section 13, 19 or 20, or
(e) in a register under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, or
(f) in annual reporting information under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, section 31.
Without limiting section 27(2)(a)–(c), matter published to the following for the purpose of making a complaint under the Judicial Officers Act 1986, section 15—
(a) the Judicial Commission,
(b) a member of staff of the Judicial Commission acting in that capacity,
(c) the Conduct Division established under the Judicial Officers Act 1986, section 13.
(Section 28 (4) (g))
Without limiting section 28 (4) (a)–(f), a document that consists of a report made by—
(a) the Medical Board of Australia, or
(b) the Medical Council of New South Wales, or
(c) a Professional Standards Committee, or
(d) the Civil and Administrative Tribunal,
of its decision or determination in respect of a complaint against a medical practitioner or an inquiry or appeal in respect of a medical practitioner, and of the reasons for that decision or determination, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 3 (5) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 28 (4) (a)–(f), a document that consists of a report made by—
(a) the Bar Council, or
(b) the Law Society Council, or
(c) the Legal Services Commissioner,
of the decision or determination of that body or person in respect of a complaint, and of the reasons for that decision or determination, under Chapter 5 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).
Without limiting section 28(4)(a)–(f), a document that consists of—
(a) a report made by a member of the Personal Injury Commission of a decision or determination of the member in respect of proceedings under enabling legislation, or
(b) a report made by a merit reviewer, medical assessor or registrar of a decision or determination of the reviewer, assessor or registrar in respect of any proceedings under enabling legislation.
Words and expressions used in this clause that are defined in the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 have the same meanings as in that Act.
(Repealed)
Without limiting section 28 (4) (a)–(f), a document that consists of a report made to the Governor by a Commissioner under section 10 of the Special Commissions of Inquiry Act 1983.
Without limiting section 28 (4) (a)–(f), any of the following documents (or parts of documents)—
(a) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Committee on Children and Young People constituted under the Advocate for Children and Young People Act 2014 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with clause 7 of Schedule 2 to that Act,
(b) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Committee on the Health Care Complaints Commission appointed as referred to in section 64 of the Health Care Complaints Act 1993 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with section 72 of that Act,
(c) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Committee on the Independent Commission Against Corruption constituted under the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with section 70 of that Act,
(d) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Legislation Review Committee constituted under the Legislation Review Act 1987 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with section 12 of that Act,
(e) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Committee on the Ombudsman, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and the Crime Commission constituted under the Ombudsman Act 1974 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with section 31H of that Act,
(f) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Public Accounts Committee constituted under Part 4 of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with section 58 of that Act,
(g) a document (or part of a document) produced to the Committee on the Office of the Valuer-General constituted under Part 8 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 in proceedings conducted in private, but only if the document (or part of the document) has been disclosed or published in accordance with section 92 of that Act,
(h) a document, or part of a document, if the document or part—
(i) is produced to the Modern Slavery Committee constituted under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, Part 2, Division 4 in proceedings conducted in private, and
(ii) has been disclosed or published in accordance with that Act, Schedule 1, clause 7.
Without limiting section 28 (4) (a)–(f), any document that consists of a decision (including reasons for a decision) made by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
Without limiting section 28 (4) (a)–(f), any document that consists of a decision (including reasons for a decision) made by an abolished tribunal (but only if such a document was included in this Schedule before the tribunal’s abolition).
(Section 29 (4) (p))
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (8) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings on an appeal to the Appeal Panel under the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (11) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings of the Privacy Commissioner, but only to the extent that those proceedings are included in a report previously made public under section 65 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (12) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings at an investigation, inquiry or examination conducted by or on behalf of the Anti-Discrimination Board constituted under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977.
(Repealed)
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (13A) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings at an inquiry conducted by Racing New South Wales under the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (14) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings on an appeal to the Racing Appeals Tribunal under the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983.
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law in respect of a medical practitioner of any of the following—
(a) the Medical Board of Australia,
(b) the Medical Council of New South Wales,
(c) a Professional Standards Committee,
(d) the Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (16) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings under Chapter 5 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) of any of the following—
(a) the Bar Council,
(b) the Law Society Council,
(c) the Legal Services Commissioner.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (17) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings of a conciliation officer, conciliator or member of the Commission under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 or the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (19) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings at a hearing held in public by the New South Wales Crime Commission.
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (19A) and (19B) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings at an inquiry conducted by a Board of Inquiry under the Work Health and Safety (Mines and Petroleum Sites) Act 2013.
(Repealed)
(cf Act No 18 1974, cl 2 (20) of Sch 2)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings of the HomeFund Commissioner, but only to the extent those proceedings are included in a report previously made public under section 34 (3) of the HomeFund Commissioner Act 1993.
(Repealed)
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), any of the following proceedings—
(a) proceedings of the Committee on Children and Young People constituted under the Advocate for Children and Young People Act 2014 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with clause 7 of Schedule 2 to that Act,
(b) proceedings of the Committee on the Health Care Complaints Commission appointed as referred to in section 64 of the Health Care Complaints Act 1993 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with section 72 of that Act,
(c) proceedings of the Committee on the Independent Commission Against Corruption constituted under the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with section 70 of that Act,
(d) proceedings of the Legislation Review Committee constituted under the Legislation Review Act 1987 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with section 12 of that Act,
(e) proceedings of the Committee on the Ombudsman, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and the Crime Commission constituted under the Ombudsman Act 1974 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with section 31H of that Act,
(f) proceedings of the Public Accounts Committee constituted under Part 4 of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with section 58 of that Act,
(g) proceedings of the Committee on the Office of the Valuer-General constituted under Part 8 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 conducted in private, but only to the extent that those proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with section 92 of that Act,
(h) proceedings of the Modern Slavery Committee constituted under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, Part 2, Division 4 conducted in private, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to the taking of evidence that is disclosed or published in accordance with that Act, Schedule 1, clause 7.
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings held in public of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
Without limiting section 29 (4) (a)–(o), proceedings of an abolished tribunal (but only if such proceedings were included in this Schedule before the tribunal’s abolition).
(Section 47)
The regulations may contain provisions of a savings or transitional nature consequent on the enactment of the following Acts—
• this Act
• any Act that amends this Act
Any such provision may, if the regulations so provide, take effect from the date of assent to the Act concerned or a later date.
To the extent to which any such provision takes effect from a date that is earlier than the date of its publication in the Gazette, the provision does not operate so as—
(a) to affect, in a manner prejudicial to any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), the rights of that person existing before the date of its publication, or
(b) to impose liabilities on any person (other than the State or an authority of the State) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of its publication.
This Act applies to the publication of defamatory matter after the commencement of this Act, unless subclause (2) provides otherwise.
The provisions of this Act (other than this clause) do not apply to a cause of action for the publication of defamatory matter that accrues after the commencement of this Act (the
(a) the post-commencement action is one of 2 or more causes of action in proceedings commenced by a plaintiff, and
(b) each cause of action in the proceedings accrues because of the publication of the same, or substantially the same, matter on separate occasions (whether by the same defendant or another defendant), and
(c) one or more of the other causes of action in the proceedings accrued before the commencement of this Act (a
pre-commencement action ), and(d) the post-commencement action accrued no later than 12 months after the date on which the earliest pre-commencement action in the proceedings accrued.
The existing law of defamation continues to apply to the following causes of action in the same way as it would have applied to those causes of action had this Act not been enacted—
(a) any cause of action that accrued before the commencement of this Act,
(b) any post-commencement action to which the other provisions of this Act do not apply because of subclause (2).
In this clause, the
In this clause—
(a) if the Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982 is repealed by the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act 2002 on or before 1 January 2006—1 January 2006, or
(b) if the Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982 is repealed by the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act 2002 after 1 January 2006—the day on which that Act is repealed.
Clause 16 of Schedule 1 and clause 11 of Schedule 3 are amended on the relevant day by omitting “Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982” wherever occurring and by inserting instead “Coal Mine Health and Safety Act 2002”.
In this clause—
(a) if the Mines Inspection Act 1901 is repealed by the Mine Health and Safety Act 2004 on or before 1 January 2006—1 January 2006, or
(b) if the Mines Inspection Act 1901 is repealed by the Mine Health and Safety Act 2004 after 1 January 2006—the day on which that Act is repealed.
Clause 17 of Schedule 1 and clause 12 of Schedule 3 are amended on the relevant day by omitting “Mines Inspection Act 1901” wherever occurring and by inserting instead “Mine Health and Safety Act 2004”.
In this clause—
(a) if Schedule 1 [1] to the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Amendment (Parole) Act 2004 commences on or before 1 January 2006—1 January 2006, or
(b) if Schedule 1 [1] to the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Amendment (Parole) Act 2004 commences after 1 January 2006—the day on which Schedule 1 [1] to that Act commences.
Clause 7 of Schedule 1 is amended on the relevant day—
(a) by omitting “Parole Board” wherever occurring and by inserting instead “State Parole Authority”, and
(b) by omitting “that Board” and by inserting instead “that Authority”.
In any other Act or instrument—
(a) subject to paragraph (b), a reference to the Defamation Act 1974 is taken to be a reference to this Act, and
(b) a reference to a provision of the Defamation Act 1974 is taken to be a reference to the corresponding provision or provisions (if any) of this Act or section 529 of the Crimes Act 1900.
Subclause (1) does not apply to any provision of another Act, or an instrument made under another Act, prescribed by the regulations.
An amendment made to this Act by the Defamation Amendment Act 2020 applies only in relation to the publication of defamatory matter after the commencement of the amendment.
In this part—
This clause applies to the 2023 amendments about (the
(a) exempting digital intermediaries from liability for defamation, or
(b) providing a defence for publications of defamatory digital matter involving digital intermediaries.
Except as provided by subclause (3)(b), the digital intermediary amendments apply to a post-commencement action.
The existing law continues to apply despite the digital intermediary amendments—
(a) to a pre-commencement action, and
(b) to a post-commencement action, but only if—
(i) the post-commencement action is 1 of 2 or more causes of action in proceedings commenced by a plaintiff, and
(ii) each cause of action in the proceedings accrues because of the publication of the same, or substantially the same, matter on separate occasions, whether by the same defendant or another defendant, and
(iii) 1 or more of the other causes of action in the proceedings are pre-commencement actions, and
(iv) the post-commencement action accrued no later than 12 months after the date on which the earliest pre-commencement action in the proceedings accrued.
This clause applies to the 2023 amendments about offers to make amends (the
The offer amendments apply to offers to make amends made after the commencement of the amendments regardless of whether the offers relate to publications occurring before or after the commencement.
The existing law continues to apply despite the offer amendments to offers to make amends made before the commencement of the amendments.
This clause applies to the 2023 amendments about courts making orders (the
(a) for, or in the nature of, preliminary discovery, or
(b) to take steps—
(i) to prevent or limit the continued publication or republication of defamatory matter, or
(ii) to comply with, or otherwise give effect to, judgments, injunctions or other court orders.
Except as provided by subclause (3)(b), the preliminary discovery or non-party digital intermediary order amendments apply to the making of an order after the commencement of the amendments regardless of whether the proceedings in which they are made—
(a) involve a pre-commencement action or post-commencement action, or
(b) were commenced before or after the commencement of the amendments.
The existing law continues to apply despite the preliminary discovery or non-party digital intermediary order amendments—
(a) to an order made before the commencement of the amendments, or
(b) to the variation or revocation of an order made before the commencement of the amendments.
This clause applies to the 2023 amendments about the defence of absolute privilege in its application to publications to officials of police forces or services of Australian jurisdictions (the
The absolute privilege amendments apply to a post-commencement action.
The existing law continues to apply despite the absolute privilege amendments to a pre-commencement action.
This clause applies to the 2023 amendments about the ways in which notices or other documents for the purposes of this Act must or may be given to, or served on, individuals or bodies corporate (the
The document giving or service amendments apply to the giving or service of notices or other documents after the commencement of the amendments regardless of whether the notices or other documents relate—
(a) to pre-commencement actions or post-commencement actions, or
(b) to proceedings commenced before or after the commencement of the amendments.
The existing law continues to apply despite the document giving or service amendments to the giving or service of notices or other documents before the commencement of the amendments.
The following provisions as inserted by the Justice Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Act 2025 extend to proceedings commenced and actions taken before the commencement of the provisions—
(a) Schedule 2, clause 8(h),
(b) Schedule 3, clause 17(h).
(Repealed)
Defamation Act 2005 No 77. Second reading speech made: Legislative Assembly, 13.9.2005; Legislative Council, 18.10.2005. Assented to 26.10.2005. Date of commencement, 1.1.2006, sec 2. This Act has been amended by cll 3–5 of Sch 4 to this Act and as follows—
No 98 | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No 2) 2005. Assented to 24.11.2005. Date of commencement of Sch 2.14, assent, sec 2 (2). | |
No 58 | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2006. Assented to 20.6.2006. Date of commencement of Sch 4, assent, sec 2 (1). | |
No 111 | Aboriginal Land Rights Amendment Act 2006. Assented to 4.12.2006. Date of commencement of Sch 2.2, 1.7.2007, sec 2 and GG No 83 of 29.6.2007, p 3965. | |
No 21 | Racing Legislation Amendment Act 2009. Assented to 15.5.2009. Date of commencement, 1.7.2009, sec 2 and 2009 (293) LW 26.6.2009. | |
No 49 | NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009. Assented to 26.6.2009. Date of commencement, 1.7.2009, sec 2 and 2009 (305) LW 1.7.2009. | |
No 53 | Government Information (Information Commissioner) Act 2009. Assented to 26.6.2009. Date of commencement, 17.7.2009, sec 2 and 2009 (329) LW 17.7.2009. | |
No 56 | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2009. Assented to 1.7.2009. Date of commencement of Sch 2.12, 17.7.2009, sec 2 (2). | |
No 119 | Surveying Amendment Act 2009. Assented to 14.12.2009. Date of commencement, assent, sec 2. | |
No 34 | Health Practitioner Regulation Amendment Act 2010. Assented to 15.6.2010. Date of commencement of Sch 2, 1.7.2010, sec 2 (2). | |
No 84 | Protected Disclosures Amendment (Public Interest Disclosures) Act 2010. Assented to 1.11.2010. Date of commencement of Sch 2, 3.3.2011, sec 2 and 2011 (121) LW 3.3.2011. | |
No 48 | Public Sector Employment and Management Amendment (Ethics and Public Service Commissioner) Act 2011. Assented to 20.10.2011. Date of commencement, 1.11.2011, sec 2 and 2011 (558) LW 28.10.2011. | |
No 55 | Inspector of Custodial Services Act 2012. Assented to 21.8.2012. Date of commencement, 30.8.2013, sec 2 and 2013 (472) LW 30.8.2013. | |
No 66 | Crime Commission Act 2012. Assented to 24.9.2012. Date of commencement of Sch 5.4, 5.10.2012, sec 2 and 2012 (499) LW 5.10.2012. | |
No 54 | Work Health and Safety (Mines) Act 2013. Assented to 1.7.2013. Date of commencement of Sch 3, 1.2.2015, sec 2 and 2014 (786) LW 12.12.2014. | |
No 95 | Civil and Administrative Legislation (Repeal and Amendment) Act 2013. Assented to 20.11.2013. Date of commencement, 1.1.2014, sec 2. | |
No 29 | Advocate for Children and Young People Act 2014. Assented to 24.6.2014. Date of commencement, 9.1.2015, sec 2 and 2014 (713) LW 14.11.2014. | |
No 33 | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2014. Assented to 24.6.2014. Date of commencement of Sch 2.13, 4.7.2014, sec 2 (1). | |
No 7 | Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Legislation Amendment Act 2015. Assented to 9.6.2015. Date of commencement of Sch 2, 1.7.2015, sec 2 (2) and 2015 (299) LW 19.6.2015. | |
No 12 | Fair Trading Legislation (Repeal and Amendment) Act 2015. Assented to 29.6.2015. Date of commencement of Sch 3.1, assent, sec 2 (1). | |
No 19 | State Insurance and Care Governance Act 2015. Assented to 21.8.2015. Date of commencement of Sch 15.2, 1.9.2015, sec 2 and 2015 (524) LW 28.8.2015. | |
No 43 | Work Health and Safety (Mines and Petroleum) Legislation Amendment (Harmonisation) Act 2015. Assented to 2.11.2015. Date of commencement, 1.2.2016, sec 2 and 2016 (46) LW 29.1.2016. | |
No 36 | Greyhound Racing Prohibition Act 2016. Assented to 26.8.2016. The amendments were not commenced and the Act was repealed by the Greyhound Racing Act 2017 No 13. | |
No 61 | Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016. Assented to 14.11.2016. Date of commencement of Sch 6.15, 1.7.2017, sec 2 (1) and 2017 (256) LW 16.6.2017. | |
No 65 | Independent Commission Against Corruption Amendment Act 2016. Assented to 23.11.2016. Date of commencement, 7.8.2017, sec 2 and 2017 (387) LW 4.8.2017. | |
No 13 | Greyhound Racing Act 2017. Assented to 11.4.2017. Date of commencement of Sch 7.5, 1.7.2018, sec 2 (1) and 2018 (304) LW 29.6.2018. | |
No 22 | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2017. Assented to 1.6.2017. Date of commencement of Sch 4, 7 days after assent, sec 2 (1). | |
No 50 | Health Practitioner Regulation Amendment Act 2017. Assented to 24.10.2017. Date of commencement of Sch 5.7, 8.1.2018, sec 2 and 2017 (666) LW 1.12.2017. | |
No 65 | Local Government Amendment (Regional Joint Organisations) Act 2017. Assented to 30.11.2017. Date of commencement, 15.12.2017, sec 2 and 2017 (730) LW 15.12.2017. | |
No 30 | Modern Slavery Act 2018. Assented to 27.6.2018. Date of commencement, 1.1.2022, sec 2. | |
No 70 | Government Sector Finance Legislation (Repeal and Amendment) Act 2018. Assented to 22.11.2018. Date of commencement of Sch 4.24, 1.7.2021, sec 2(1) and 2021 (305) LW 25.6.2021. | |
No 10 | Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2019. Assented to 26.9.2019. Date of commencement of Sch 1.11, assent, sec 2 (1). | |
No 16 | Defamation Amendment Act 2020. Assented to 11.8.2020. Date of commencement, 1.7.2021, sec 2 and 2021 (303) LW 25.6.2021. | |
No 18 | Personal Injury Commission Act 2020. Assented to 11.8.2020. Date of commencement of Sch 6.1, 1.3.2021, sec 2(3) and 2020 (729) LW 18.2.2020. | |
No 8 | Greater Cities Commission Act 2022. Assented to 13.4.2022. Date of commencement, assent, sec 2. | |
No 14 | Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022. Assented to 13.4.2022. Date of commencement, 1.10.2023, sec 2 and 2023 (11) LW 20.1.2023. | |
No 36 | Defamation Amendment Act 2023. Assented to 30.10.2023. Date of commencement, 1.7.2024, sec 2 and 2024 (178) LW 31.5.2024. | |
No 52 | Greater Cities Commission Repeal Act 2023. Assented to 12.12.2023. Date of commencement, 1.1.2024, sec 2. | |
No 15 | Justice Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Act 2025. Assented to 2.3.2025. Date of commencement, assent, sec 2. |
Sec 4 | Am 2017 No 50, Sch 5.7; 2020 No 16, Sch 1[1]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1[1]. |
Sec 4A | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[2]. |
Sec 9 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[2]–[4]. |
Sec 10 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[5]. |
Sec 10A | Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1[6]. |
Part 2, Div 2A | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[3]. |
Sec 10B | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[3]. |
Sec 10C | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[3]. |
Sec 10D | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[3]. |
Sec 10E | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[3]. |
Part 3, Div 1, heading | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[7]. |
Sec 12A | Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1[8]. |
Sec 12B | Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1[9]. |
Sec 14 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[10] [11]. |
Sec 15 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[12]–[17]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1[4] [5]. |
Sec 18 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[18]–[20]. |
Sec 21 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[21] [22]. |
Sec 22 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[23] [24]. |
Sec 23 | Subst 2020 No 16, Sch 1[25]. |
Sec 23A | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[6]. |
Sec 24 | Am 2005 No 98, Sch 2.14 [1]. |
Sec 26 | Subst 2020 No 16, Sch 1[26]; 2022 No 14, Sch 8.5. |
Sec 27 | Am 2023 No 36, Sch 1[7] [8]. |
Sec 29A | Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1[27]. |
Sec 30 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[28] [29]. |
Sec 30A | Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1[30]. |
Sec 31 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[31]. |
Sec 31A | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[9]. |
Sec 32 | Am 2005 No 98, Sch 2.14 [2]. |
Sec 33 | Rep 2020 No 16, Sch 1[32]. |
Sec 35 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[33] [34]. |
Sec 39A | Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1[10]. |
Sec 44 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[35]–[37]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1[11]–[14]. |
Sec 48 | Rep 2006 No 58, Sch 4. |
Sch 1 | Am 2005 No 77, Sch 4, cll 3 (2), 4 (2), 5 (2); 2006 No 111, Sch 2.2 [1]; 2009 No 21, Sch 3.2 [1] [2]; 2009 No 94, Sch 2.19; 2009 No 53, Sch 1.1; 2009 No 56, Sch 2.12; 2009 No 119, Sch 2.7; 2010 No 34, Sch 2.12 [1]; 2010 No 84, Sch 2.1 [1] [2]; 2011 No 48, Sch 2.2; 2012 No 55, Sch 3.5; 2012 No 66, Sch 5.4; 2013 No 54, Sch 3.4 [1]; 2013 No 95, Schs 1.3 [1], 2.46 [1] [2], 6.1 [1], 7.1 [1], 10.5 [1]; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.12 [1] [2]; 2015 No 12, Sch 3.1; 2015 No 19, Sch 15.2 [1] [2]; 2015 No 43, Sch 4.4; 2016 No 61, Sch 6.15 [1]–[5]; 2016 No 65, Sch 3.3; 2017 No 13, Sch 7.5 [1]–[3]; 2017 No 22, Sch 4.7; 2017 No 65, Sch 2.7; 2018 No 30, Sch 5.4A; 2018 No 70, Sch 4.24[1]; 2019 No 10, Sch 1.11 [1] [2]; 2022 No 8, Sch 5.2; 2023 No 52, Sch 2.1; 2025 No 15, Sch 3[1]. |
Sch 2 | Am 2006 No 111, Sch 2.2 [2]; 2010 No 34, Sch 2.12 [2]; 2013 No 95, Schs 1.3 [2], 2.46 [3], 6.1 [2], 7.1 [2], 10.5 [2]; 2014 No 29, Sch 4.3 [1] [2]; 2014 No 33, Sch 2.13 [1]; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.12 [3]; 2016 No 61, Sch 6.15 [6]; 2018 No 70, Sch 4.24[2]; 2020 No 18, Sch 6.1; 2025 No 15, Sch 3[2]. |
Sch 3 | Am 2005 No 77, Sch 4, cll 3 (2), 4 (2); 2006 No 111, Sch 2.2 [3]; 2009 No 21, Sch 3.2 [3]; 2010 No 34, Sch 2.12 [3]; 2013 No 54, Sch 3.4 [2]; 2013 No 95, Schs 1.3 [3], 2.46 [4], 6.1 [3], 7.1 [3], 10.5 [3]; 2014 No 29, Sch 4.3 [3] [4]; 2014 No 33, Sch 2.13 [2]; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.12 [4]; 2015 No 43, Sch 4.4; 2016 No 61, Sch 6.15 [7]; 2018 No 70, Sch 4.24[3]; 2025 No 15, Sch 3[3]. |
Sch 4 | Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1[38] [39]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1[15]; 2025 No 15, Sch 3[4]. |
Schs 5, 6 | Rep 2006 No 58, Sch 4. |
0
0
0