Defamation Act 1901 (ACT)
Defamation Act 1901 No 22
(repealed)
Republication No 3
Republication date: 2 July 2002
Amendments incorporated to 2 July 2002
As repealed by Act 2001 No 88
Unauthorised version prepared by ACT Parliamentary Counsel's Office
About this republication
The republished law
This is a republication of the Defamation Act 1901 (repealed). It includes any commencement, amendment, repeal or expiry affecting the republished law to 2 July 2002 and any amendment made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 (Editorial changes).
The legislation history and amendment history of the republished law are set out in endnotes 3 and 4.
Kinds of republications
The Parliamentary Counsel’s Office prepares 2 kinds of republications of ACT laws (see the ACT legislation register at type="disc">
authorised republications to which the Legislation Act 2001 applies
unauthorised republications.
The status of this republication appears on the bottom of each page.
Editorial changes
The Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 authorises the Parliamentary Counsel to make editorial amendments and other changes of a formal nature when preparing a law for republication. Editorial changes do not change the effect of the law, but have effect as if they had been made by an Act commencing on the republication date (see Legislation Act 2001, s 115 and s 117). The changes are made if the Parliamentary Counsel considers they are desirable to bring the law into line, or more closely into line, with current legislative drafting practice.
When preparing the authorised version of this republication amendments were not made under part 11.3 (see endnote 1).
Uncommenced provisions and amendments
If a provision of the republished law has not commenced or is affected by an uncommenced amendment, the symbol U appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the uncommenced provision or amendment appears only in the last endnote.
Modifications
If a provision of the republished law is affected by a current modification, the symbol M appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the modifying provision appears in the endnotes. For the legal status of modifications, see Legislation Act 2001, section 95.
Penalties
The value of a penalty unit for an offence against this republished law at the republication date is—
(a)if the person charged is an individual—$100; or
(b)if the person charged is a corporation—$500.
Amendments incorporated to
2 July 2002
Defamation Act 1901 (repealed)
Contents
Page
Part 1Preliminary
Name of Act 2
Part 2Civil proceedings
Right of action for oral slander 3
Proviso where plaintiff’s character not likely to be injured 3
Evidence of apology admissible in mitigation 3
Truth no defence unless public benefit 4
Payment into court 4
Defence of apology and payment into court 4
Costs on verdict for less than $4 5
Part 3Criminal proceedings
Libel with intent to extort money 6
Malicious publication of false defamatory libel 6
Malicious publication of defamatory libel 7
Plea of truth and public benefit 7
Court may consider whether guilt aggravated by plea 7
Truth not a defence except under plea of justification 8
Plea of not guilty available 8
Defence of absence of authority, knowledge etc 8
Costs on private prosecution for libel 8
Part 5Remedies of judgment creditors
Execution against presses etc 9
Part 6Miscellaneous
Certain defences not available if this Act not complied with 10
Endnotes
About the endnotes 11
Abbreviation key 11
Legislation history 12
Amendment history 13
Earlier republications 14
Amendments incorporated to
2 July 2002
Defamation Act 1901 (repealed)
An Act to consolidate the statutes relating to defamation
Part 1Preliminary
Name of Act
This Act is the Defamation Act 1901.
Part 2Civil proceedings
Right of action for oral slander
The right of action for oral slander shall extend to all defamatory words for which an action might have been maintained in NSW before 24 August 1847 if such words had been reduced into writing.
Subject to the provisions of this Act, all the rules in force relating to actions for written slander, so far as they are applicable, shall be deemed to apply to actions for such defamatory words.
Proviso where plaintiff’s character not likely to be injured
On the trial of any action for defamatory words not imputing an indictable offence, the court or jury may, if the defendant has pleaded that the words set forth in the statement of claim were spoken on an occasion when the plaintiff’s character was likely not to be injured thereby, consider whether the words were spoken on such an occasion.
If the court or jury are of opinion that the said words were spoken on an occasion when the plaintiff’s character was not likely to be injured thereby, they may find a verdict for the defendant.
Evidence of apology admissible in mitigation
In any action for defamation, the defendant may (after notice in writing of his intention so to do duly given to the plaintiff at the time of filing or delivering the defence in such action) give in evidence in mitigation of damages that he made or offered an apology to the plaintiff for such defamation before the commencement of the action, or as soon afterwards as he had an opportunity of doing so in case the action has been commenced before there was an opportunity of making or offering such apology.
Truth no defence unless public benefit
In any action for defamation, whether oral or otherwise, the truth of the matters charged shall not amount to a defence to such action unless it was for the public benefit that the said matters should be published.
Where the truth of the said matters is relied upon as a defence to such action, it shall be necessary for the defendant in his defence to allege that it was for the public benefit that the said matters should be published, and the particular fact or facts by reason whereof it was for the public benefit that they should be published.
Unless the said allegation is made out to the satisfaction of the court or jury as well as the truth of the said matters, the plaintiff shall be entitled to recover a verdict with such damages as the court or jury thinks proper.
Payment into court
In any action for defamation, the defendant or one or more of several defendants, may pay into court a sum of money by way of compensation, satisfaction, and amends.
Defence of apology and payment into court
In an action for a libel contained in any public newspaper or other periodical publication, the defendant may plead that such libel was inserted in such newspaper or publication without actual malice and without gross negligence, and that before the commencement of the action, or at the earliest opportunity afterwards, he inserted in such newspaper or publication a full apology for the said libel, or (if such newspaper or publication is ordinarily published at intervals exceeding one week) had offered to publish the said apology in any newspaper or periodical publication to be selected by the plaintiff.
The defendant, upon filing a defence under subsection (1), may pay into court a sum of money by way of amends for the injury sustained by the publication of such libel.
Costs on verdict for less than $4
If, in any action for defamation, a verdict is returned in favour of the plaintiff for damages in any sum less than $4, the plaintiff shall have judgment to recover such sum only, and shall not have judgment to recover any costs, unless the judge in any case of libel certifies that the words charged as defamatory were published without reasonable grounds or excuse.
Part 3Criminal proceedings
Libel with intent to extort money
Whosoever—
(a)publishes or threatens to publish any libel upon any other person; or
(b)directly or indirectly threatens to print or publish, or directly or indirectly proposes to abstain from printing or publishing, or directly or indirectly offers to prevent the printing or publishing of any matter or thing touching any other person;
with intent—
(c)to extort any money or security for money, or any valuable thing from such or any other person; or
(d)to induce any person to confer upon or procure for any person any appointment or office of profit or trust,
commits an offence.
Maximum penalty: 300 penalty units, imprisonment for 3 years or both.
Nothing herein contained shall in any manner alter or affect any law now in force in respect to the sending or delivery of threatening letters or writings.
Malicious publication of false defamatory libel
Whosoever maliciously publishes any defamatory libel, knowing the same to be false, commits an offence.
Maximum penalty: 300 penalty units, imprisonment for 3 years or both.
Malicious publication of defamatory libel
Whosoever maliciously publishes any defamatory libel commits an offence.
Maximum penalty: 300 penalty units, imprisonment for 3 years or both.
Plea of truth and public benefit
On the trial of any indictment or information for a defamatory libel, the defendant having pleaded such plea as is hereinafter mentioned, the truth of the matters charged may be inquired into, but shall not amount to a defence unless it was for the public benefit that the said matters should be published.
To entitle the defendant to give evidence of the truth of the said matters as a defence to such indictment or information, it shall be necessary for the defendant in pleading to the said indictment or information to allege—
(a)the truth of the said matters in the manner now required in pleading the truth of matters under section 6 in an action for defamation; and
(b)that it was for the public benefit that the said matters should be published; and
(c)the particular fact or facts by reason whereof it was for the public benefit that the said matter should be published.
To such plea, the prosecutor may reply generally denying the whole thereof.
Court may consider whether guilt aggravated by plea
If after such plea, the defendant is convicted on such indictment or information, the court in pronouncing sentence may consider whether the guilt of the defendant is aggravated or mitigated by the said plea and by the evidence given to prove or to disprove the same.
Truth not a defence except under plea of justification
The truth of the matters charged in the alleged libel shall in no case be inquired into unless the defendant has pleaded to the indictment or information as provided in section 13.
Plea of not guilty available
In addition to such plea, the defendant may plead a plea of not guilty.
Defence of absence of authority, knowledge etc
Where, upon the trial of any indictment or information for the publication of a libel, evidence has been given under the plea of not guilty which establishes a presumptive case of publication against the defendant by the act of any other person by his authority, it shall be competent to such defendant to prove that such publication was made without his authority, consent, or knowledge, and did not arise from want of due care or caution on his part.
Costs on private prosecution for libel
In case of any indictment or information by a private prosecutor for the publication of any defamatory libel—
(a)if judgment is given for the defendant—the defendant shall be entitled to recover from the prosecutor the costs sustained by the defendant by reason of such indictment or information; or
(b)if, upon a special plea to such indictment or information of the truth of the matters charged, the issue be found for the prosecutor—the prosecutor shall be entitled to recover from the defendant the costs sustained by the prosecutor by reason of such plea,
such costs to be taxed by the proper officer of the court before which the said indictment or information is tried.
Part 5Remedies of judgment creditors
Execution against presses etc
When any person is convicted either in a civil or a criminal proceeding of printing or publishing a defamatory article, the plaintiff or prosecutor in whose favour judgment is given may, under his writ of execution, levy the costs, damages, penalty, and expenses named therein, out of the whole of the types, presses or printing materials whatsoever belonging to the person whose types, presses or printing materials, or any part thereof, have been used in printing such defamatory article, as well as out of the property of the defendant on the record.
Part 6Miscellaneous
Certain defences not available if this Act not complied with
No defendant in any proceeding, civil or criminal, shall be able to avail himself of any of the benefits or advantages of this Act unless at the time of the publication of the article complained of if it be a printed article, all of the provisions made by law for regulating the printing and publication of newspapers and papers of a like nature or of the trade of printing generally, applicable to such a work as that in which such article is printed have been complied with.
Any specified non-compliance with any such provision shall be a good answer to any pleading under this Act.
Such defendant shall nevertheless be bound by the other part of this Act.
Endnotes
About the endnotes
Amending and modifying laws are annotated in the legislation history and the amendment history. Current modifications are not included in the republished law but are set out in the endnotes.
Not all editorial amendments made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 are annotated in the amendment history. Full details of any amendments can be obtained from the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office.
Uncommenced amending laws and expiries are listed in the legislation history and the amendment history. These details are underlined. Uncommenced provisions and amendments are not included in the republished law but are set out in the last endnote.
If all the provisions of the law have been renumbered, a table of renumbered provisions gives details of previous and current numbering.
The endnotes also include a table of earlier republications.
If the republished law includes penalties, current information about penalty unit values appears on the republication inside front cover.
Abbreviation key
am = amended ord = ordinance amdt = amendment orig = original ch = chapter p = page cl = clause par = paragraph def = definition pres = present dict = dictionary prev = previous disallowed = disallowed by the Legislative (prev...) = previously Assembly prov = provision div = division pt = part exp = expires/expired r = rule/subrule Gaz = Gazette reg = regulation/subregulation hdg = heading renum = renumbered IA = Interpretation Act 1967 reloc = relocated ins = inserted/added R[X] = Republication No LA = Legislation Act 2001 s = section/subsection LR = legislation register sch = schedule LRA = Legislation (Republication) Act 1996 sdiv = subdivision mod = modified / modification sub = substituted No = number SL = Subordinate Law num = numbered underlining = whole or part not commenced o = order or to be expired om = omitted/repealed
Legislation history
This Act was originally a NSW Act—the Defamation Act 1901 No 22 (NSW).
The Act was in force in NSW immediately before 1 January 1911 (the date of establishment of the ACT) and was continued in force by the Seat of Government Acceptance Act 1909 (Cwlth), s 6.
Under the Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 4 the Act had effect in the ACT as if it were an ACT law (subject to ordinances made under the Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910).
The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 (Cwlth), s 34 (4) converted most former NSW laws in force in the ACT into ACT enactments. This allowed the ACT Legislative Assembly to amend and repeal the laws. This Act was converted into an ACT enactment on 11 May 1989 (self-government day).
Under the Interpretation Act 1967, s 65 (now expired) all former NSW Acts in force in the ACT immediately before 10 November 1999 (including this Act) became, for all purposes, laws made by the ACT Legislative Assembly. This completed the process of making former NSW Acts fully into ACT laws.
NSW legislation
Defamation Act 1901 No 22
assented to 26 October 1901
commenced 26 October 1901as amended by
Commonwealth legislation
New South Wales Acts Application Act 1984 No 41 sch 2 pt 11
notified 10 August 1984
commenced 10 August 1984Legislation after becoming Territory enactment
Statute Law Revision (Penalties) Act 1998 No 54 sch
notified 27 November 1998 (Gaz 1998 No S207)
s 1, s 2 commenced 27 November 1998 (s 2 (1))
sch commenced 9 December 1998 (s 2 (2) and Gaz 1998 No 49)Statute Law Amendment Act 2001 (No 2) 2001 No 56 pt 3.14
notified 5 September 2001 (Gaz 2001 No S65)
commenced 5 September 2001 (s 2 (1))as repealed by
Defamation Act 2001 No 88 s 43 (1)
notified LR 24 September 2001
s 1, s 2 commenced 24 September 2001 (LA s 75)
s 43 (1) commenced 1 July 2002 (s 2)Amendment history
The New South Wales Acts Application Act 1984 (previously the New South Wales Acts Application Ordinance 1984), sch 2, pt 11 sets out the text of this Act in an amended form and provided for the amended form to apply as the text of the Act in force in the ACT. This endnote, therefore, only details amendments made after that date.
Name of Act
s 1sub 2001 No 56 amdt 3.243
Right of action for oral slander
s 3am 2001 No 56 amdt 3.244
Libel with intent to extort money
s 10am 1998 No 54 sch; 2001 No 56 amdt 3.245
Malicious publication of false defamatory libel
s 11am 1998 No 54 sch; 2001 No 56 amdt 3.246
Malicious publication of defamatory libel
s 12am 1998 No 54 sch; 2001 No 56 amdt 3.247
Earlier republications
Some earlier republications were not numbered. The number in column 1 refers to the publication order.
Since 12 September 2001 every authorised republication has been published in electronic pdf format on the ACT legislation register. A selection of authorised republications have also been published in printed format. These republications are marked with an asterisk (*) in column 1. Except for the footer, electronic and printed versions of an authorised republication are identical.
Republication No
Amendments to
Republication date
1 Act 1984 No 41 31 July 1992 2 Act 2001 No 56 2 May 2002
Unauthorised version prepared by ACT Parliamentary Counsel's Office
© Australian Capital Territory 2002
0
0
0