Administrative Decisions Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council v Hunter [2012] NSWADTAP 15 Hearing dates: 3 February 2012 Decision date: 07 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel - Internal Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Deputy President
R Perrignon, Judicial Member
J Newman, Non-Judicial MemberDecision: 1. The Tribunal's first order, that:
The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the ground of disability is substantiated.
is affirmed.
2. The Tribunal's second order that:
The Tribunal directs the respondent to pay the amount of $21,810.00 to Mr Hunter within 28 days of this decision.
is set aside.
3. The appeal is extended to the merits of the Tribunal's decision but only on the question of the calculation of economic loss during the period from 5 March 2005 to 19 October 2005.
4. In substitution for the Tribunal's second order, the following order is made:
The Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council pay to Mr Hunter the amount of $23,951.00 within 28 days.
Catchwords: APPEAL - disability discrimination in work - whether Tribunal breached procedural fairness in selecting a single comparator when several were put forward - identification of the circumstances in which a comparison should be made for the purposes of the differential treatment element of direct discrimination - onus of proof and the drawing of inferences in discrimination complaints - calculation of economic loss Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: Re Refugee Tribunal; ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57; (2000) 75 ALJR 52
Director General, Department of Education & Training v FP and FQ on behalf of FR (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 51
Building Professionals Board v Ball [2008] NSWADTAP 70
Commissioner for the Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576
Fenwick v Beveridge Building Products Pty Ltd (1985) 62 ALR 275
Purvis v State of New South Wales (2003) 217 CLRTexts Cited: Williams CR, "Burdens and Standards in Civil Litigation" (2003) Sydney Law Review 9 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council (Appellant)
Mr D Hunter (Respondent)Representation: Counsel
K Eastman (Appellant)
M Tibbey (Respondent)
Chalk & Fitzgerald (Appellant)
Legal Aid NSW (Respondent)
File Number(s): 119044 Decision under appeal
- Citation:
- Hunter v Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council [2011] NSWADT 202
- Date of Decision:
- 2011-08-24 00:00:00
- Before:
- Equal Opportunity Division
- File Number(s):
- 081053
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
In late 2004 Mr Hunter's name was put on a casual register to perform monitoring and excavation work for the Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council. He was offered work from time to time which involved walking behind earthmoving equipment and looking for Aboriginal cultural artefacts. Mr Hunter had an epileptic fit at one of the work sites on 4 March 2005. After that, until 19 October 2005, the Land Council offered him significantly less work than they had previously offered him. Mr Hunter had two seizures on the night of 19 October 2005, following which he was hospitalised. He was not offered any work after that date and lodged a complaint of disability…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council v Hunter and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] NSWADTAP 15
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Tribunal did not breach procedural fairness in selecting a single comparator. The court reasoned that while multiple comparators were proposed, the Tribunal was entitled to select one comparator and the applicant had not demonstrated that the selection of a single comparator led to an unjust outcome. Regarding the identification of the circumstances for making a comparison, the court held that the Tribunal's approach was consistent with the requirements of the legislation. The court also determined that the Tribunal did not err in its calculation of economic loss, finding that the Tribunal had properly applied the relevant principles.
As a result of the appeal, the Tribunal's first order, that the complaint of unlawful discrimination on the ground of disability was substantiated, was affirmed. However, the Tribunal's second order, directing the respondent to pay a specific amount to Mr Hunter, was set aside. The court extended the appeal to the merits of the Tribunal's decision but only on the question of the calculation of economic loss during the relevant period. In substitution for the Tribunal's second order, the court ordered that the Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council pay Mr Hunter a different amount within 28 days.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Tribunal's first order, that:
The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the ground of disability is substantiated.
is affirmed.
2. The Tribunal's second order that:
The Tribunal directs the respondent to pay the amount of $21,810.00 to Mr Hunter within 28 days of this decision.
is set aside.
3. The appeal is extended to the merits of the Tribunal's decision but only on the question of the calculation of economic loss during the period from 5 March 2005 to 19 October 2005.
4. In substitution for the Tribunal's second order, the following order is made:
The Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council pay to Mr Hunter the amount of $23,951.00 within 28 days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.