Deepanshu (Migration)

[2022] AATA 3331

Deepanshu (Migration) [2022] AATA 3331 (17 August 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr  Deepanshu

CASE NUMBER:  2206205

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/2173701

MEMBER:Mary Sheargold

DATE:17 August 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) for the purposes of Public Interest Criterion 4001 and cl 485.216(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 17 August 2022 at 3:33pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – criminal history – Digital National Police Certificate provided upon review – decision under review remitted          

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 360
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 485.216, r 2.03; Schedule 4, Public Interest Criterion 4001

statement of decision and reasons

application for review

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 26 August 2020. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 20 April 2022.

2. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of criminal history was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

3. On 13 July 2022, the Tribunal received a copy of the applicant’s most recent Digital National Police Certificate Immigration/Citizenship – Australia along with character materials in support of his application.  In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

4. In reaching its decision the Tribunal did not consider a hearing to be necessary, as it was able to find in favour of the applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to s 360(2)(a) of the Act.

   decision

5. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

   ·Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) for the purposes of Public Interest Criterion 4001 and cl 485.216(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

   Mary Sheargold
   Member