Legal Research
Cases
Decorrado v Knowles (No.2)

Decorrado v Knowles (No.2)

Case [2009] VCC 511

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Decorrado v Knowles (No.2) [2010] VCC 511
Case: [2009] VCC 511
Decision Date: 30 March 2010 and 23 April 2010 (Costs)

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Decorrado v Knowles (No.2) [2010] VCC 511

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd [1988] FCA 364
Citation 1

…n Ltd v De Jager [1984] VR 483; PCRZ Investments Pty Ltd v National Golf Holdings Ltd [2002] VSCA 24; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 and Degman Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Wright (No 2 ) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 and to Williams Civil Procedure , para 63.02.200. 262 The Court can take into account, in…
Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407
Citation 2

…lso FAI Traders Insurance Co Ltd v Savoy Plaza Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 343, at 347- 251 and Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407, at [10-13], [308], [330-332].…
Zachariadis v Allforks Australia Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 258
Citation 3

…ied the “genuine pre-estimate of damages” and “out of all proportion” tests to the determination of whether a provision was a penalty. [57] [2009] VSCA 258. 115 I am satisfied that the defendant has established that the rate fixed by the third loan agreement upon default of repayment of 5.5 per cent per month was…
Piscopo v Not Lawyers [2008] FCA 1907
Citation 4

…ty Ltd v National Golf Holdings Ltd [2002] VSCA 24; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 and Degman Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Wright (No 2 ) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 and to Williams Civil Procedure , para 63.02.200. 262 The Court can take into account, in determining…
Yarra Capital Group Pty Ltd v Sklash Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 109
Citation 5

…ip between the contracting parties, a factor relevant to the unconscionability of the plaintiff’s conduct in seeking to enforce the term.” [54] [2006] VSCA 109. [55] (1986) 162 CLR 170, at 193.…
Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298
Citation 6

…fendant was not unreasonable: see Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Work Cover Authority (No.2) .[175] [175] (2005) 13 VR 435. 268 I therefore propose to award costs to the plaintiff against the defendant on a party- party basis. 269 A further issue argued was in respect of the question of a stay. The de…
Hardie v Shadbolt [2004] WASCA 175
Citation 7

…contractual interest on the termination date was a breach of contract, for which the respondent’s remedy was damages.”[163] [161] [2004] WASCA 175. [162] (1874) LR7HL 27. [163] [2004] WASCA 175, at [46].…
PCRZ Investments Pty Ltd v National Golf Holdings Ltd [2002] VSCA 24
Citation 8

…ities including: Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd v De Jager [1984] VR 483; PCRZ Investments Pty Ltd v National Golf Holdings Ltd [2002] VSCA 24; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 and Degman Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Wright (No 2 ) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354…
Hungerfords v Walker [1989] HCA 8
Citation 9

…Mr Cilmi and Mr Lagana, the plaintiff would have only received one-third of any interest paid by the defendant. [159] Hungerfords v Walker (1989) 171 CLR 125. [160] T 71, L 105-106, 119-120. 240 I was not referred to authority on whether a claim for damages for detention of debt was a Hungerford’s claim. In Hardie v…
AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin [1986] HCA 63
Citation 10

…ting parties, a factor relevant to the unconscionability of the plaintiff’s conduct in seeking to enforce the term.” [54] [2006] VSCA 109. [55] (1986) 162 CLR 170, at 193.…
O'Dea v Allstates Leasing System (WA) Pty Ltd [1983] HCA 3
Citation 11

…unt in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach.”[53] [51] [1915] AC 79, 86-87. [52] (1983) 152 CLR 359. [53] at 399-400.…
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings [1977] UKPCHCA 1
Citation 12

…astings Shire Council .[21] Nor did the payments establish a custom and usage, which might provide a basis for an implication of a term. [21] (1977) 180 CLR 266. 50 It is noteworthy that the Extension of Agreement specifically continued interest payments for three months, but no longer. 51 In my opinion, Cook v Fowle…
Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd [1956] HCA 51
Citation 13

…whether the defendant had repaid the loans. The defendant bears the onus of proving repayment of the loans.[59] [59] Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd (1956) 99 CLR 560. 118 A few days after 7 April 2004, the plaintiff sold the business she conducted on the Werribee property and repaid $30,000 of the loan by a cheque…
Decorrado v Manoukian [2009] VSC 451
Citation 14

…at the defendant’s conduct in making four monthly payments of interest after the due date alters that position. [22] (1874) LR 7HL 27. [23] [2009] VSC 451. 52 I do not consider that the fact that the defendant paid four monthly interest payments is basis for establishing an implied term, present in the contract a…
Harrison Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited [2008] VSC 235
Citation 15

…ngrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd and the judgment of Habersberger J . in Harrison Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd .[56] [56] [2008] VSC 235. 113 The Yarra Capital Group Case bears some analogies with the present in that it concerned the question of whether an interest rate payable upon defa…
Ugly Tribe Co Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189
Citation 16 (Para 7)

…ade allegations that the opposite party was guilty of fraud, knowing them to be false. [172] [172] See Ugly Tribe Co Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189 at [7]. 263 The defendant countered by pointing to aspects of the plaintiff’s case including the large sum that the plaintiff had originally claimed against the defe…

AI Chat coming soon