| [2023] FWC 2242 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365—General protections
Declan Briggs
v
Workcon (Qld) Pty Ltd
(C2023/2630)
| COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 4 SEPTEMBER 2023 |
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal – jurisdictional objection – application made out of time – no exceptional circumstances – application dismissed.
On 9 May 2023, Mr Declan Briggs made an application pursuant to s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) alleging that he was dismissed by Workcon in contravention of the general protection provisions of the Act. Despite Mr Briggs’ objections, I considered it necessary to make a name change order to correct the name of the respondent to Workcon (Qld) Pty Ltd (the Respondent) as I am satisfied that is the true name of the employer.
Mr Briggs claimed that he was dismissed by the Respondent on 31 October 2022. The Respondent denies that Mr Briggs was dismissed on this date or at all. The Respondent’s position is that Mr Briggs did not respond to any more requests to attend for work after this time.
Accordingly, there are two jurisdictional issues for consideration before the Fair Work Commission (the Commission); firstly, should an extension of time be granted to Mr Briggs, and if the answer is yes, secondly, has Mr Briggs been dismissed?
Section 366 of the Act states:
“366 Time for application
(1) An application under section 365 must be made:
(a) within 21 days after the dismissal took effect; or
(b) within such further period as the FWC allows under subsection (2).
(2) The FWC may allow a further period if the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, taking into account:
(a) the reason for the delay; and
(b) any action taken by the person to dispute the dismissal; and
(c) prejudice to the employer (including prejudice caused by the delay); and
(d) the merits of the application; and
(e) fairness as between the person and other persons in a like position.”
For Mr Briggs to have made his application within the statutory time limit of 21 days after he asserts the dismissal took effect, the application needed to have been filed by 21 November 2022. The application has been made 196 days out of time.
Mr Briggs seeks an extension of time within which to make his application.
Earlier unfair dismissal application
Mr Briggs made an unfair dismissal application to the Commission in matter U2022/11083. Commissioner Simpson was allocated that matter and on 2 March 2023, convened a Directions Hearing by telephone on account of his preliminary view that Mr Briggs had not completed a period of six months of employment with the Respondent and would not satisfy the minimum employment period to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
Mr Briggs appeared at that Directions Hearing and was supported by his mother, Ms Vanessa Walker. Mr Briggs is 19 years old. Towards the end of the Directions Hearing, the Commissioner determined that he was satisfied that the minimum employment period had not been…
Continue reading Declan Briggs v Workcon (Qld) Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Declan Briggs v Workcon (Qld) Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 2242
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2242
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.